"Now the virus has spread to almost every country, infecting at least 446,000 people whom we know about, and many more whom we do not. It has crashed economies and broken health-care systems, filled hospitals and emptied public spaces."
Now reimagine this as a video game with thousands of players online together. Their goal is to avoid getting infected, keep their grandparents alive, keep hospitals from having to turn people away.
How many rounds would it take for them to figure out they have to self-isolate and wash their hands?
Wouldn't it be better if they could figure this out in a video game instead of real life?
Let's imagine another version of the game, aimed at policy makers. How many rounds would they have to play to figure out how to keep the virus from spreading. And how NOT slowing it down will affect the economy and the health care system?
Was there money in the stimulus package for gaming companies?
I'd note also that the use of war metaphors for every crisis tells us more about who we are than it helps solve problems. This is a natural disaster. Like with a hurricane we have to avoid the fury of the storm. We have to avoid hosting the virus. Going to war with nature is the source of the biggest human problems in the world today - climate change, ocean acidification, species loss, industrial waste caused illnesses, economic disparities, etc. Finding a sustainable balance within nature is NOT war.
This Corona Virus game is about whether people can cooperate to save themselves and each other from harm and death.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be reviewed, not for content (except ads), but for style. Comments with personal insults, rambling tirades, and significant repetition will be deleted. Ads disguised as comments, unless closely related to the post and of value to readers (my call) will be deleted. Click here to learn to put links in your comment.