Tomorrow, Spoutible will be available for the 150,000-200,000 people who have preregistered.
Right now [well I was from 9am PST to 11ish] I'm listening to Christopher Bouzy on a Twitter Space talking to several thousand people about tomorrow's launch. I've heard him several times before talking about how they plan to make a platform that's easy for Twitter users to navigate, yet corrects many of the problems of Twitters.
[I'd also note that Boozy was the creator of Bot Sentinel, a site where you can check on people who post on Twitter. Using Twitter's standards, Bot Sentinel rates users so you can see if the account is normal or harasses people. They'll use that technology to track Spoutible users and I heard earlier you will be able to see the Bot Sentinal rating of people who reply to you. At right is an example of a Bot Sentinel report.]
First I'll list some key points I heard, then I'll just leave a very rough transcript of what was said (starting about an hour into the discussion)
Overview of Key Points as I heard them
- User safety and security - the platform was designed to give users a safe space for discussion. To that end a number of features have been put in place.
- General security of the site aimed at making it harder to be hacked, and if hacked, harder to steal personal info of users because all is encrypted
- Users can delete replies and block hateful users, this also blocks replies to the blocked users
- Spoutible has tighter security for users joining (they have to give their phone number which also prevents someone from making more than two accounts with one number) and more vigilant system to detect users abusing the rules
- Key feature ways to keep mis- and disinformation to a minimum
- Money and size less important to Spoutible than safety and security
- Acknowledgement, repeatedly that
- no system is completely safe from hackers
- that there will be mistakes, but they'll jump to fix them as fast as possible
- determining the right balance on issues (ie what is misinformation) will always be difficult
- we're just starting, give us time to discover and fix bugs, work with us
- Want to promote media and news outlets important
- Only three months old, but have experience of Twitter, and will be adding features and tweaking system as it develops
- Intentionally made it easy for Twitter folks to move over to Spoutible - it will feel comfortable and familiar.
- Expects that Twitter users with lots of followers will stay on Twitter until followers move over - but working on ways to post on both platforms at once
My notes - (not sure what time I moved to the laptop to take notes) (These are pretty rough, but I hope I've gotten the gist of the questions and the answers)
Anne - how quick a turnaround response to a hate attack? (She said she'd been a victim with death threats etc. on Twitter, had to call FBI and that Twitter was slow in responding.)
Christopher - we have tools to address swarming, trying to get folks to harass you, they'll get time out. On the other side, sometimes people say dumb things, and they we won't take action if they aren't crossing the line.
Crossing the line - is used a lot. But Christopher recognized that figuring out where that line is.
We have tools - you can delete replies and block people. Would like to have folks hold off on those things until the platform has been up a while. But you have tools to block things yourself if necessary.
Michael Morgan (was a test account for the last couple of weeks - says was not paid and is not connected to Spoutible)
Safe, Fresh, has your interests at heart. Some platforms push the issues that rile you. On Spoutible that isn't going to happen.
Smoke detector - tells you about accounts. [ I wasn't sure what Smoke Detector means. sounds like some sort of warning system, or notification system.]
Spoutible eels like wearing comfortable slippers as you move from Twitter.
Q: Will edition up tomorrow have push notifications? What will Spoutible do to address feature parity with other platforms.
Christopher: We are trying to get Spoutible out as soon as possible, so focused on what people wanted first. So yes, there will be push notifications so you know when people respond. We can add features in suitable time frame. Twitter, sometimes take months. Some stuff we'll do in days, other in months. The push stuff we'll have up soon.
Freature parity, laugh, we're trying not to fall into the trap, but don't have an answer for that.
Melinda: Thanks, sounds very good. Planning on platform or stand-alone app, like Tweet deck, but they cancelled it. Like it because dynamic. Going to do something like that?
Christopher: Tweet deck does still exist. Don't worry about being nervous - I'm nervous. It's in the pipeline to allow customize platform. Most don't want that because they want to maximize platform.
Going to launch own app store to allow developers to extend the capability of Spoutible. Not having that made making Spoutible work was much harder.[Not sure how to fix that sentence.] Not sure when, but we'll do it. Part of the road map to allow developers to come in.
Rick: Working with media orgs? Birdwatch?
Christopher: That's the plan - like to work with other outlets to let you to text certain stuff. Don't want just anyone to come in. Not sure how, but will invite journalists to discuss. Important to platform, but also to democracy in general. Want to work with outlets to keep garbage off. Don't want mis- and disinformation rampant. Do we take off this misinformation? Tag it? Something deadly like treat COVID with bleach, will be removed. Want to be the platform for media, researchers - people who fight this stuff.
???: You're being really thoughtful in how you approach this stuff. Use tools available and protect yourselves.
Christopher: Thanks for saying this. I have a vision and had for a while. Tried to get Twitter folks to see this, but they went on as business as usual. Rare opportunity. Twitter isn't the same anymore. If we had launched five months ago, it would have failed. You wouldn't have moved. I think we have a chance now - people want to leave for a better alternative - content moderation at scale is difficult, but we've built Spoutible with that in mind. Someone being doxxed with phone number, user can remove themselves. Be patient with us. There'll be bugs. Twitter had a long time to do this. Give us time. We've only had three months. A year from now if you don't see us listening, then call us out. First few weeks allow us to get our bearings.
Q: Thanks, doing great job. 1. Will you be able to keep media and reporters
Christopher? Will we address folks in the media who target Spoutible? yes
2. Have global manpower to support? They have people in other countries, do you have that?
3. Do you communicate with followers across the platform. I have followers who are important for online fundraisers, will I be able to communicate with them.
Christopher: 1. going after journalists, I am pro journalists, news outlets, even ones negative to me. But there are people who do that actively. It would probably be addressed by the panel, do we ban the president, do we kick off journalists who are attacking? Difficult questions.
2. International? Not yet. Focusing on US first. But there will be people using the platform, but if someone is spouting in another language, there are translators doing it automatically and can see. But ultimately we will have people. I believe in work from home model - you can have people moderating in France or Brazil and not have everyone in central place. My team is spread around the world to develop safe platform.
3. Want to allow folks to cross post, - allow to Tweet and Spout simultaneously. But present owner may shut that down. One tech hurdle. Spout 300 characters but Twitter fewer. If you want to cross post you'll have to reduce # of characters. I'm going to be Tweeting a while trying to get people over here. People with 500k are going to stay on Twitter as well. Not giving up those followers. But eventually hope followers move. If he shuts it off, he shuts it off. Haven't figured out how to have seamless transition from one platform to another and keep all your followers.
Dr. Kate - a lot of people earn a living saying terrible things about people. Would you moderate for me or expect me to block them.
Christopher -Say Meghan Markle. How help this lady to breathe? VP Harris and others. Overwhelmingly women and women of color who go through this. You have those tools in place you can use to prevent them from posting in your feeds. I have been victim of people profiting off of hate. On Spoutible will be extremely hard to do that. [But of course people will take that as a challenge.] We also have to be proactive knowing who is own our platform. If account is focused on attacking Meghan Markle or VP Harris we'll take it off. Other platforms have this policy, but they don't enforce it. Youtube channels could have 50 videos on Markle, they don't take it down. On Spoutible, they will get removed. Not just user, but Spoutible will too. We know hostile nations will do this. Why we want phone numbers. We won't be perfect, but your experience on Spoutible will be vastly better than on Twitter
Gadi Ben-Yehuda - been on T since 2006. I'm a social media director, ability to manage those. Someone mentioned Tweet deck, if I'm overseeing multiple accounts can I use single platform? Encouraging businesses and more important government on. My school is delayed, National Park Service.
Christopher: Yes. Extremely important. But flip side to third parties to post on your behalf is completely different from a hostile foreign nation. Only certain verified will be able spout on behalf of a user. Outreach - we've had conversation, but focus for last few months was to get this up and running and then go for govt. agencies. There are a lot of officials who have preregistered and even are on and testing. Hope word of mouth. Also want local organizations and authorities, so amber alert will be available on spoutible. How can we make the platform better? Part of us communicating? Gotta be honest. Only three months.
Akunjee - They successfully brought in ways to onload people onto platform. Get to set ethos - these are the sort of people here. There townhall system allowing local conversations, to set up discussions on those issues. Going to look at these?
Christopher - Yes, no. Not opposed to. Open to suggestions. How we've developed this platform - allowing you to give your ideas. We took a lot and implemented them. I took flak. I had a vision. Wanted you to participate. So far worked well. Something like that is a feature we'd be interested in that. If you ask 10 people you get 10 different answers. But if ask 10K you start seeing patterns. I said earlier, no Nazis on the platform. Misinformation/Disinformation number 2. Took top stuff you wanted us to address. Yes. Clubhouse could work well on Spoutible. Totally against waitlists. You build something, you want a few folks to test. We did. But then need to open up. If you have a waitlist, it stifles the momentum. Even what we're doing, a week for the preregistered people, will slow us down, but I think it's for ???. Not studio 54, you can come in, you can't. Once the preregistered week is over, all can join
Julie - I was targeted by horrific racists - N word, videos, my 5 year old daughter. Had to call FBI. Eventually Twitter . He duplicated my account - bio, pics, etc. And he Tweeted terrible things in my name. Twitter wanted my drivers license. I didn't want to give them that info. If that happens on Spoutible. Would we have to give Drivers License to verify identity.
Christopher. Look at this from Twitter's perception, and sorry you had to go through this. Horrible on platform and feel like platform not helping. From Twitter's perspective. How do I know that picture belongs to you. Basic verification - customer service that handles bank security. We don't want that. But whatever company we partner with, what will they do with it? Sell it? No. Just for verification. If user targeted, get verified. If another account steals it, we can take it down. If this account is doing other stuff and doing crazy stuff - we'll take them down for other stuff. But if stealthy, we have the problem of verifying. People in this room opposed using phone numbers to verify. We had to find balance. Not looking to sell numbers or spam people. With Spoutible resend an email or two a week. No spam stuff. Also to keep people from creating a bunch of accounts with one phone number. It's encrypted. Not selling.
Hoping to launch about 12am, maybe 3am. Definitely tomorrow. Probably early.
If you preregistered, your email address is on the list. You have to use same email address, you have to use same email address. Still debating about phone number confirmation. Have 60-70 people try it out, have some bugs, but it's built to handle 1 million users, but we don't get those numbers. If we have tech difficulties, be patient. Prepared for more people. Don't think 200K will sign up, it will be staggered.
Is it fast? Fast now, but we'll see in a week if it holds up. Built with scale in mind. Using service called ??Detectify. Looking for vulnerabilities in our code. Tried our best to make it as secure as possible. But if a hacker finds something - there are people who spend all day hacking. If firm tells us there's a problem, we'll notify you immediately. Microsoft finds vulnerabilities all the time. We will be. If it happens, all they get will be encrypted data.
Thanks for taking this journey with us. I promised we'll get it up by mid-Jan or February. We did that. I promised certain features. We did that. Look at what we've done in 3 months and think about what we can do in a year. Give us time to work it out. It's not going to feel like a beta.
We don't have to accept this crap, this misinformation/disinformation. We can do something about it. If you see us turning into another Twitter, you need to hold our feet to the flames. Not about how many users or money, but success for us is protecting users.
-------------------
I did notice the remarkable situation of Spoutible holding this meeting on Twitter to encourage people to leave Twitter. Did Twitter not notice? Not care? One commenter during the meeting asked when Twitter was going to shut them off. Twitter never did.
