This first one captures my impression of the debate.
I thought that Yang made a number of good points. He's an outsider in a number of ways - as a Chinese/American, as a business man, his lack of political/governmental experience. And he's smart. That lets him raise issues we wouldn't normally get. But he also seems a little isolated from things as well as this Tweet from a Filipina/American who calls out his use of the smart-Asian stereotype and his implied lack of acknowledgment of non-East Asian Asians, who make up most of the Asian/American population. But it's good to see his face and ideas up there in the Democratic debates.
Bernie seemed to have a cold, but he's been around a long time, has been fighting the status quo forever, and his ideas are now mainstream. He's one I'd have full confidence in going one-on-one with Trump. He knows the facts and he's got the passion.
I've been really impressed with Harris in her Senate role questioning witnesses. But as someone pointed out tonight, she's a lot better at asking questions than answering them. While I think this Tweeter exaggerates, she does seem to be caught off-guard with people questioning her credentials and record.
Yes, I was struck by the kind of issues that were raised and how united most of the candidates were on the basic issues. And the fact that Beto broke the tip toeing around gun issues wide open with his impassioned stance.
I've come to the conclusion that O'Rourke would make a much better Senator than a President. He's got a way of saying things clearly and with passion. I'm less confident of his overall common sense and ability to administer. A role in the Senate is perfect for his talents.
And Butteig also made history for a presidential debate.
I'm afraid Biden is the great white hope in this group. He's the link to the Democrats of old. He's the 'safe' candidate. Like Hilary. (Who did actually win the popular vote and would probably have won the electoral college without Russian interference in the election - which includes what we know about things like FB ads and what we don't know about about the wins in Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.) But Trump would run circles around him in a one-on-one debate. Trump's lies and insinuations would leave him tongue-tied. The only possible way he could win would be because people felt sorry for him. And that's not a good look for a president.
And talking about playing the record player to help kids learn is exactly the kind of thing that raises questions about his time having passed. But there were folks who defended his reference to record players.
I think Booker is another candidate who could go head-to-head with Trump. He too knows his facts and talks well. And he's been a mayor and a US Senator.
Another is Elizabeth Warren:
I'd like to see her when she wasn't turned up to full indignation mode. She has a right to be indignant, but I'd like to hear her sometime talking in a normal voice.
I noticed a lot of obvious GOP Tweeters out to trash every candidate - except Tulsi Gabbard, who wasn't in the debate.
And here's an
article about a despicable attack ad on ABC during the debate by paid for by donors to the GOP New Faces PAC,
"opened with a photograph of the young Latinx congresswoman’s face being set on fire to reveal images of the 1970s genocide in Cambodia underneath."
This is the kind of open hate the grew worse and worse in 1930s Germany. No, this is not a frivolous comparison.
I've read Victor Klemperer's I Will Bear Eyewitness in which he, among other things, documents the language used by the Nazis from the 30's through the end of WWII. This sort of ad targeting AOC is not only blatantly untrue propaganda, but it's also a call to crazies to physically attack people like AOC.
And this reaction to O'Rourke's call to buyback assault weapons:
F
rom the Texas Tribune:
Republican state Rep. Briscoe Cain drew fierce ire Thursday night for a gun-related tweet that many considered to be a death threat against Democratic presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke.
Twitter took the comment down within hours because it violated a rule forbidding threats of violence and O'Rourke's campaign planned to report the tweet to the FBI, according to CNN. It's against federal law to threaten "major candidates" for president.