Redistricting Board Awards $400,000 Attorney Fees To East Anchorage Plaintiffs

James Brooks reported in the Alaska Beacon and APRN that the Alaska Redistricting Board met Friday October 13 to approve a $400,000 payment to the East Anchorage plaintiffs who challenged the Eagle River Senate pairings and prevailed in the Supreme Court.  

I only learned about it when I read the Sunday Anchorage Daily News last week.  

So essentially I'll refer you to the link above for details since I didn't get to attend.  

The email alerts the Redistricting Board sent out to subscribers for a couple of years, were shut down after the final map was approved.  

There are still some possible settlements out there. The East Anchorage and Girdwood plaintiffs (who challenged the second Eagle River Senate pairings and also prevailed and received $115,000) are the two that had major victories and got settlements for their legal fees.

I'd note that the first and second Eagle River pairings were decided by a 3-2 vote, with the majority made up of Republicans and the minority making dramatic objections and predictions that the decision would be overturned by the Supreme Court.  

But Alaskans are the ones that bear the costs, not those who made the widely opposed decision.  

Legal expenses have been the largest part of the Board's budget.  Some of that is anticipated by the way the Constitution sets up the appeal process - basically Alaskans are given 30 days to challenge the Board's map.  They do this by filing objection with the Superior Court and any disputes (usually all of them) get decided in the Supreme Court.  

But as I said above, this was clearly a partisan gerrymandering attempt by the Republicans on the Board that went against all (non-partisan) common sense.  So much of the legal expenses paid to the Board's attorney* and the winning plaintiffs ($515,000) could have been avoided.  

I looked at the Board's budget a year ago and hope to look at the budget closer to it being final.

*It's harder to determine what part of the Board's attorney payments went to defend the Eagle River decisions.  Should we count the first map defense?  Some of it, but there were other plaintiffs as well who had other (non-Eagle River Senate pairing) objections.  Definitely we can count expenses after the Board majority passed the second Eagle River pairing, which I figure as at least $150,000.  See the Budget post.