The Payoff of Hate: Where We Stand Today

[Sort of a Synopsis:  This post covers a lot of issues that are entangled and usually handled separately, if at all.  But it does make it seem like I'm throwing in lots of different issues and can't get focused.  Let me try

Hate is the basic tactic and underlying disease of the Trump administration.  It's a symptom of how in "the greatest country the world has ever seen' something terribly wrong is happening in families and how kids are being raised.  Without the love and basic decency a happy society needs.  

Enough voters have been raised in dysfunctional families to elect a Trump.  (Assuming Trump's comments about Elon having fixed the election are just bluster.)  The leader of the kids raised without the love and approval all kids deserve is a terrible president.Iran is  like Trump University - it was a threat to something else Trump valued more:  an upcoming election.   

But Iran - and the reflecting pool - another conspicuous and highly visible failure - are only diversions from the Epstein files.  The Epstein files themselves are a diversion from the far right conservative organizations that have filled the Supreme Court with their puppets and had the blueprint for dismantling the US bureaucracy.  

And finally, coming back to hate.  We need to recognize the source of MAGA anger and give them legitimate options to heal.  Many of them probably are too far gone, but fighting hate with hate is to lose to hate.  And to miss the power behind the throne.  

I hope that's a fairly reasonable overview.  The rest is basically the same idea with more detail.]

Post begins here:

Hate.  Slurs.  Constantly demeaning people who don't adore you.  You've heard enough of Trump's invective to know what I'm talking about, so I needn't repeat it.

We're basically shaped by our genes and our environment.  I would argue that it was the hate and nastiness experienced by tens of millions of US voters that drew them to vote for Trump.  People who grew up hating people whose skin color was darker than theirs.  People who watched their fathers verbally and physically abuse their mothers.  People who grew up in households where fights - verbal and physical - were the way to solve problems.  People whose religious leaders lashed out at people who were sexually attracted by people the church thought sinful.  People who suffered at the hands of their fathers, but nevertheless, copied his child-rearing practices.  

Such folks get both genes and environment pushing them toward a life of difficult relationships, lack of skills for peacefully resolving problems.  And that leads to hard lives, to feelings that one is on one's own, that no one will help you.  Some of these folks will lead an economically perilous life. Some will have skills and (maybe an inheritance) that allows them financial security, even serious wealth.  But they are all hurting.   Until a hand reaches out to help them - an addiction recovery group, an evangelical church, or a cult movement led by a bully.  

Despite the odds, not all those folks are fated to repeat what they learned at home.  Some may just figure it out.  That there's a better way.  That they don't want to inflict on their kids what they received.  They may have a teacher who shows them better interpersonal skills.  A pastor or other mentor who cares without expecting something in return.  Or in other ways, discover options they didn't learn at home.  

If I'm right on this, there are millions of women who were not treated well by their fathers, but through some twisted human flaw, seeing those traits in Trump draws them to him.  He may be problematic but he reminds them of their father, who despite his issues, was still their father.

And so today, we have a president who never gives up, never loses.  Heather Cox Richardson has pointed out that even though it appears that his name was taken down from the Kennedy Center, he's covered the space with a tarp so that his missing name is not visible.  Nor is Kennedy's.   He always tries to find a way pretend he didn't lose.  

But there are a couple of examples that would seem to belie this:  The Trump University $25 million settlement and the Iran War.  In both cases I think the same thing happened.  

Pursuing the issue further conflicted with something else he wanted more.  

The Trump University court case was threatening his presidential election bid.  By paying the settlement, he made it go away.  

The Iran War was crumbling Trump's ratings and promising to hurt him badly in the 2026  midterm election.  The blocking of the Strait of Hormuz was causing oil prices to rise and people could see it at the gas station.  He kept announcing victory and peace deals that weren't happening.  That too was getting humiliating (the worst thing that can happen to Trump).  So, like with Trump University, he instructed Vance (I think) to do whatever was necessary to make it go away.  

But even Republican politicians - usually Trump's most obedient sycophants - are pointing out that Trump's peace deal left Iran in a better position than before the war.  A more hardline leadership is now in place, Iran realized that control of the Strait of Hormuz was a great weapon, their nuclear capability was resurrectable, AND Trump was handing them $300 billion in taxpayer dollars to repair the damage the US did with the bombing.  [That's probably, in humanitarian terms, a reasonable thing to do.  After all the US did the damage.  Was it $300 billion worth?  That I don't know.  But it's a good international precedent for Russia when Putin's war on Ukraine is settled.]

But, of course we don't know that this war is actually settled.  Israel is not going to honor the clause that ends their war on Lebanon.  [Years ago when I mentioned how Israel's treatment of Palestinians was costing Israel world opinion, a strong supporter of Israel responded:  "We don't care.  The world will attack us no matter what we do."  And while there is probably some truth in that, it's not a long term winning strategy, but it does seem like it's part of Israeli leaders' thinking.]

Many of the actions of this administration are visible to a relatively few people who are directly affected and the media are doing a terrible job of rooting them out and making them better known.  And they are relatively abstract.  Hard to comprehend. There are so many of them every day that they are quickly forgotten as new outrages replace them in one’s awareness  

But the Iran War has dominated the news and its consequences are clear.  

Trump promised not to start any wars.

Trump criticized Obama for paying Iran $1.5 billion in frozen Iranian assets when they agreed to limit their nuclear program and allow international monitors.  

So now Trump is paying them $300 billion, not in frozen Iranian assets, and there is no real agreement on nuclear weapons.

And the Strait of Hormuz is under Iranian control.  And gas prices have spiked.

All pretty visible.  

Trump started a war at the behest of Netanyahu, and has lost badly.  

Getting out of the war and making it go away was better than letting it drag on through election season.  It's just that Mr. Art of the Deal came out with the short end of the stick.  

And while the Iran War diversion is crumbling, we get the most concrete (as in the opposite of abstract) example of Trump's incompetence, as the blue paint peels off the bottom of the reflecting pool and the pool itself fills with green algae.  This is a relatively cheap (in Trump terms) boondoggle.  

Except.  Except that Trump told us himself that he knows the pool guy and he does great work. [I've tried to change the coding so that it just covers a short portion of this long video.  If it didn't work, I'll try again.  If it does, I'll delete this note.] [It did work, but I'll leave the note anyway because the video on the embed from Bluesky doesn't seem to work here.  But you can click on the Bluesky icon in the lower right and see the video on Bluesky.  He shows us the algae in the pool and pulls out a piece of paint that peeled off the bottom.]

But now, about 49 years and 355 days sooner than Trump predicted (his low end estimate of 50 years) in the video, the pool is covered with algae and the paint is peeling off the bottom in large chunks..  

New blue paint appears to be peeling from the bottom of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. So far the algae seems to be winning.

[image or embed]

— Mickey Kuhns (@mickeykuhns.bsky.social) June 18, 2026 at 8:05 PM

I've added the reflecting pool example because this is so very tangible and no one can get lost in the complexity.  "I'm going to fix this pool that no one else has been able to fix and it will last for fifty to one hundred years" and then we see the algae and pieces of the 50 year paint floating in the pool days later.  (Though Trump supporters can claim the algae and paint video is fake, in their heart of hearts, they know it isn't.)

This post started with focus on hate.  Trump and the Republicans have been spewing hate and stirring fear among the MAGA.  And in contrast to Trump's ridiculously expensive, testosterone dripping  cage fight, yesterday's opening of the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago was an example of hope and caring and decency.  

I'm just hoping that even those attracted to Trump because of the hate, can see the utter failure of the Iran war and the reflecting pool paint job.

Afterward:  There is enough content already and this post should end already  so consider this post finished.  But everything is connected  - and that’s partly why it’s so hard to comprehend how terrible the Trump presidency is.  

But as satisfyingly understandable as the Iran war and reflecting pool debacles are, they’re just distraction from Epstein.  

And Epstein is just a distraction from the structure hiding behind Trump that is dismantling our democracy and installing themselves as the new rulers of the United States  Organizations like the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society, the billionaire oligarchs.  

Chris Hedges makes this point when he criticizes the late night satirists for heaping scorn on Trump and ignoring the power brokers behind him.   Not only does bullying the president move the focus from the people who will take over when Trump is gone, he asserts, it also makes his followers support him more. Clinton wasn't wrong when she called them deplorable, but by insulting them collectively, she united them even more behind Trump.  And that's why I think recognizing them as troubled rather than deplorable is a better approach.  Bernie Sanders and Pete  Buttigieg seem to better understand the pain of the working class and the need to include them in the Democratic messages.

After afterward:  For the folks who want to jump all over me for mentioning Sanders and Buttigieg, I'm just saying one thing about them.  Don't leave messages about them unless it's to provide evidence to disprove the point that they have recognized that Democrats haven't taken working men's grievances seriously.  Thank you.