There's guns, abortion, Ginni Thomas, Jan 6, COVID, Louis DeJoy still running the post office, the high rejection rates in Alaska's recent all mail in election, climate change related fires and storms yet no serious action to curb carbon emissions, Ukraine, attacks on LGBTQ, . . .
There are just too many fronts for anyone to meaningfully comment about much.
So I'm limiting this to a couple of very narrowly focused thoughts.
1. How Will History Report All This? People have been talking about how history will judge things that are coming to light at the Jan 6 hearings. But I've been concerned that if gerrymandering and misinformation and voter suppression work, those in control will be the people who will write history in T's favor.
But then I realized that historians around the world will also be writing this history and if we're lucky, they'll preserve the real story. And if we're even luckier, the hearings - like the Watergate hearings did eventually - will shock enough people into realizing how close we were to a coup. And we'll have a repeat of the post-Watergate cleaning up.
2. The Supreme Court And Presidential Elections. As I watched Twitter today there was a lot of attention on Ginni Thomas, Tom Eastman, Clarence Thomas, and Alito. Now people may think this is all just wild speculation, but I've been fairly careful with who I follow on Twitter, and I've found Twitter gives me a one to three day heads up on what gets covered in the mainstream media. But as I was listening to the chatter that suggests Eastman thought that if the ratification of the election got delayed a week or so, then Thomas and Alito would support the T position. Far fetched?
Then I thought about how the Court intervened to interrupt the Florida recounts to declare Bush president. They've done this before. John Roberts was on the Bush side of that verdict. And I began to think about how that too was probably planned out in advance. Scary stuff. Maybe some researchers will get some of those involved to offer more on how that was pulled off.
3. Nancy Pelosi, an American Hero. Several people gave Pelosi a lot of credit today. First, for calling Congress back after the insurrection so they could finish ratifying the election. Not giving the Court any time to intervene. Second for going ahead with the Jan 6 hearings. That she'd even pulled a fast one of McConnell who refused to participate in a joint Senate and House hearing that would have give T Republicans much more power. (As someone said, they would have subpoenaed Hunter Biden and interrogated him for three months to block everything else.) But McConnell said no, and now the Democrats can do what they want and they're doing it well. With the considerable assistance of Liz Cheney.
4. Lessons in Making Judgments About People - Exhibit 1: Liz Cheney. I totally disagree with most of her policy beliefs. Never expected to be saying positive things about her. But I do share her belief in the rule of law. And the various T insiders who have been testifying remind us that despite the many morally questionable decisions they had to make to serve Trump, they did have some red lines they wouldn't cross.
Great, timely article, Steve. Pelosi is a hero for all time, except if magats retake congress there will be months of HRC Benghazi like kangaroo courts to destroy her reputation without any actual proof.
ReplyDeleteI also share your thoughts on Ms Cheney, the carpetbagger cum congresswoman pariah for magats in Wyoming.