So I went to Friday's board meeting at UAA. I haven't been to a board meeting - well, it's been so long that I don't remember at all. So I wasn't quite sure what to expect. It was relatively easy. I knew a couple of key people there who could tell me what was happening. I got to talk to three of the regents during breaks, and have a video tape of one (below).
There is lots of information (and then again, in some cases, not so much) online at the board's webpages. For instance:
- A members page that links to bios of each of the regents. I've covered the previous board here and the four new members here.
- Minutes page. This offers links to the Summary of Actions at each meeting and to the Official Minutes. The Actions Taken is bare bones. For example, here's the complete summary of actions for their 2 day retreat in January, 2015:
That's it.Board of Regents Annual Retreat January 22-23, 2014 Anchorage, AlaskaSUMMARY OF ACTION
1. Approval of Bargaining Unit Agreement between the University of Alaska and United Academics AAUP-AFT/AFL-CIO (UNAC)
PASSED "The Board of Regents approves the collective bargaining agreement between the University of Alaska and United Academics AAUP-AFT/AFL-CIO (UNAC) for the term of January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016. This motion is effective January 23, 2014."
The Official Minutes tend to add a little more - like who made the motion and who seconded it and who voted yes and who voted no and the language of what was passed. It's focused mostly on technical details, and it's light on substance. There's no sense of the discussion before the vote and how the discussion went. You'd be hard pressed to understand the reasons for and against any issue. The minutes spends more words on how they went in and out of executive session, but doesn't explain the subject of the executive session, which seems to be counter to the Alaska Administrative Procedures Act requirements for Executive Session which says:
"The motion must state specifically what will be discussed and must be approved by a majority vote. The motion must contain enough detail that the public (and if necessary a court) will be informed of exactly why the executive session is appropriate, without defeating the purpose of going into executive session. Only the item(s) identified in the motion may be discussed in the executive session. " [emphasis added]
This clearly requires more than the minutes tell us.
- There are other items like Agendas (these tend to have links to all the documents used at the meetings - follow links to boarddocs), By-Laws, and Policy and Regulation (lots of detail here - all the rules of the university).
- Information on the search for the new president, including the committee members
There were two major items that caught my attention at Friday's morning meeting. The first was the tuition increase of 5 percent across the board. Two regents voted against it - Regent Fisher arguing (and these are from my quick notes as he spoke):
Since on the board, our headcount declined 8.4% and credit hours up 5%. But budget has increased. Two reports by national experts on operation of university. Both told us we needed cost containment for administrative costs. Even thought headcount and credit hour count went down, our administrative costs have gone up. I don't think the studentsBut otherwise, there wasn't much opposition and no students were there to protest. A couple even said it was fine. The president said the administrative cutbacks would come with the current round of budget cuts. Here's the table that was in the agenda for the budget increases:
of Alaska and their parents shouldn't bear the costs of our inability to contain costs.
The second item of interest to me was public testimony about the eviction of the Tanaina Child Development Center from their space in the sports complex basement. It's on hold, sort of, while a task force looks at options. This is a topic I've been thinking about and wanting to post about. I went to the task force later that afternoon and will do a separate post on that soon.
Here's the video of Regent John Davies I took. While my camera work could have been better, he gives a good description of his background and what he thinks he can contribute to the board.
It's good I went yesterday, because they don't meet too often. The next two meetings are:
- April 9-10, 2015 - Bethel
- June 3-5, 2015 - Fairbanks
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be reviewed, not for content (except ads), but for style. Comments with personal insults, rambling tirades, and significant repetition will be deleted. Ads disguised as comments, unless closely related to the post and of value to readers (my call) will be deleted. Click here to learn to put links in your comment.