Assembly Repeals New Labor Law. Mayor Vetoes Their Vote

Anchorage Assembly Meeting - click to enlarge

The Assembly voted 7-4 to repeal Assembly Ordinance 37 which squeaked by last year after Assembly Chair Ernie Hall cut off public participation.  The ordinance pretty much gutted collective bargaining in Anchorage and Ernie Hall nearly got voted out of office by a write in candidate who came within several hundred votes after joining the campaign two weeks before the election.   Some have argued this was similar to the anti-union ordinances that have been pushed by the Koch brothers in places like Wisconsin.  It was a hugely divisive ordinance. 

Tonight, after a lot of testimony, the Assembly voted 7-4 to repeal the old ordinance.  This was possible because Tim Steele was elected over appointed Assembly person Cheryl Frasca and because Adam Trombley and Bill Starr, who both voted for the original legislation, tonight said there were flaws in the bill and they were willing to work with others to make a better ordinance.   Trombley and Starr voted with Dick Traini, Elvi Gray-Jackson, Paul Honeman (who was there by teleconference), Patrick Flynn, and Tim Steele. 

You can see all the Assembly profiles here. 

Mayor Sullivan (r)

However, as soon as the bill passed, the Mayor immediately vetoed it and had his veto already written, printed, and ready to hand out. 

The no votes sounded pretty adamant about their votes and to override the Mayor's veto requires eight votes.



Here's the veto.  I saved it as very big file so you can read it easily if you click on it.

For me the big question is why did Starr and Trombley change their votes?  Both were strongly supported by the mayor and have voted with him on most if not all critical votes.    Both said they were willing to meet with those who so strongly opposed 37 and work out a better ordinance.

Yet I can't help think that after watching how Ernie Hall almost got beaten in the last election - by a write-in candidate no less - that they are looking out for the next election in April 2014 when their terms expire.  They can say to the unions that they voted to repeal the ordinance.  And if they did their homework and counted the votes, they knew that the ordinance would stay in place with the mayor's veto.  Starr comes from Eagle River which tends to vote pretty conservatively, so perhaps that isn't his motive.  On the other hand, I don't know how many union voters live in Eagle River and Municipal elections don't have that much of a turnout usually.  Trombley represents East Anchorage which is a lot more volatile and former state legislator Pete Petersen has already said he was going to run against Trombley.

I generally stay away from Assembly meetings.  The ones I've gone to have sucked a lot of blogger time out of me.  If I went regularly I'd have no time for anything else.  We went to the discussion on democracy and the role of government upstairs, and after we stuck our heads in to see how things were going.   So I'm not completely clear on the timeline of this.  But a petition to repeal Ordinance 37 got enough signatures.   In a video interview I did with Assembly member Dick Traini during a break in the meeting [see below], he said the Assembly plans to put the repeal measure on the April municipal ballot.  He also says the mayor plans to veto that, but he's sure the Assembly will win in court.  The elections are handled by the Municipal Clerk who works for the Assembly, not the Mayor.




But if the ballot included repeal of 37, then a lot of union folks are sure to vote.  Municipal elections - especially when there is no mayoral race - have turnouts under 20%.

So Assembly members Trombley and Starr had some incentive to repeal the measure already.  That would keep it off the ballot and not as many union members would vote.  And this way they can say they already voted to repeal it.

Interesting dynamics.

[UPDATE Jan 18, 2014:  Judge sided with the Mayor on his ability to veto the vote.]

Raking Leaves for Mulching Reveals The Moss

With all this back and forth, I find myself waking up and wondering where I am.  When we get to my mom's or back home or to our granddaughter's, we have to readjust to a new setting, new routine, new organization and time schedule.  And gardening.  Oh dear.  Can't plant seeds.  Too much to ask a house sitter.

But today in the sunshine I raked the leaves and mulched the flower beds.  It felt good. 

As I pulled leaves to one side, the bright green moss below was revealed.  I'm all for letting nature do most of the work, and she comes through with the moss every time.

Such amazing stuff, the moss.  Some of my neighbors are not as excited about our natural look, but I'm always able to find justification for my inclinations.  From Garden Trappings:

"Years ago moss was viewed as an interloper on the lawn and great pains were taken to eradicate it.  Now, ever so slowly, moss is creeping into garden landscapes and in some gardens has become the surprise star of the show.  This fragile, sun-shy species believed to be one of the first forms of plant life on earth has delighted Japanese gardeners for centuries.  Moss gardens are edging into western landscapes as gardeners finally pay respect to its serene beauty and its utilitarian benefits of drought resistance and low maintenance.  Moss is a great substitute for the thirsty grass lawn."

Landscaping
Benefits of Moss

• Drought Tolerant/Uses less Water than Grass
• Low Maintenance/Never needs Mowing
• Hypo Allergenic
• Stays Green Throughout the Year
• Adds Beauty, Charm & Serenity
• Repels Weeds
• Prevents Soil Erosion"

What more could one ask for?  Unfortunately the moss is mainly on the north side of the house, only about as far as the house blocks the sun in the summer.  From that point on, natural means dandelions and clover.  I'm working on justifications for that too.  Clover's good for the soil and dandelions are such a beautiful yellow.  And they're edible.

And as long as we have to yoyo up and down the West Coast, the garden is going to have to mostly look after itself. 

Do You Miss Civil Discourse About Important Topics?

I got this email today.  Looks like I missed the first two discussions, but the next one is tomorrow (Tuesday) evening at Loussac from 6pm-7:30pm.

Let’s Talk Anchorage
Dialogues in Democracy

Join a conversation on “What is the Role of Government?” this Tuesday, October 22, from 6:00 to 7:30 in the Ann Stevens room at the Loussac Library. Engage in a respectful, facilitated conversation, share your knowledge and learn what others think.



“Dialogues in Democracy” is a program of “Let’s Talk Anchorage”, a collaboration between the Anchorage Public Library and Alaska Common Ground. It will convene a community conversation each Tuesday night until the end of November.  The list of topics is as follows:

1.    October 8: Violence in America
2.    October 15: UAA Conversation Salon – Information is not Knowledge: How Media Influences our Reality [1 and 2 already happened.]
3.    October 22: What is the Role of Government?
4.    October 29: Educating for Democracy
5.    November 5: Library will be closed. No dialogue on this date.
6.    November 12: UAA Conversation Salon – Information is not Knowledge: How Media Influences our Reality
7.    November 19: Inequality for All – A discussion of the film
8.    November 26: What is a good society?

No Moose, Lynx Talk, And A Brown Bear - Powerline Pass Walk

Last time I did a fall post on Powerline Pass, I discovered that it was internationally known among wildlife photographers as an easy to access spot to get great moose photos.  And with all our back and forth along the West Coast this summer, I hadn't been up there.

While the sky was pretty clear this morning - and we did a wind check with someone living on the Hillside - it turned out to be a different season up there.  We had a light snow most of the two hours we were out and a moderate, but steady, wind.  Really, English needs some more words for snow.  This was the kind of snow where dry white flakes fall like tiny leaves, but you would hardly consider real snow.  It wasn't the kind of stuff that sticks.  None of the puddles we passed had even a hint of ice.  There has been snow up here already, but the last couple of weeks with 50˚F weather (in town) and wind has cleaned it all out.  Looking at the last moose (camera) hunt post up at Powerline Pass, I found it was October 10 and a sunny day, but with lots of ice in the puddles.

I'm including this one of the bear because it shows the snowflakes.  It didn't seem nearly that thick.  I suspect it's just a telephoto lens trick.

Already, on the trail from the parking lot (the new 'overflow' parking lot is now replacing that beautiful field of summer wild flowers) someone told us about a lynx on the side of the trail.  We never saw it, but a couple more people later on also mentioned it.  Lynx tend to stay clear of people and there were a fair number of hikers and bikers and runners up there today.  A lynx that was hanging out with that many people seems either habituated to people or ill.  In any case, we didn't see it.

But we did see the brown bear way over on yonder ridge.  We wouldn't not have seen it if someone hadn't pointed it out to us.  And you wouldn't see it here if I didn't have my new camera which can make something very far away seem close.

It was a good sized bear that is getting fat and waiting for some more serious snow and cold before hibernating.

And we did see some blue sky here and there.  And the sun came out as we got down the mountain and into town.

Powerline Pass - you can see some of the power lines on the left - is in Chugach State Park just east of Anchorage.  About a 20 minute drive from midtown Anchorage.  You go into an entirely different world, and at this time of year, at an elevation of about 3300 feet, a different season as well.

The Vagaries Of Google For Bloggers

Yesterday I began getting hits for something I posted a year and a half ago:

Friday, February 03, 2012

Nobodyhere: Digital Genius - The Most Brilliant Website I've Ever Experienced

This happens now and then.  Somehow a photo or a post moves up on google's algorithm and people start showing up at the blog.  Sitemeter, less and less frequently, shows me the actual search terms people used.  I'm not sure why, but I don't fret over it.

In the Nobodyhere case, people were coming using google, but not one of the sitemeter reports showed the search term.  I googled "Nobodyhere" but What Do I Know didn't show up.

This morning they were still coming.  This time I tried "The Most Brilliant Website" and bingo, the Nobodyhere post showed up number 5 on google. 

I really don't know for sure what that means either since google personalizes the searches and so when I search I'll get a different list than others will get.  And I don't know why, seemingly out of the blue, this post suddenly got a more prominent placement.  Sometimes, when I suddenly get hits for a specific post - often about a person - it indicates to me that the person is in the news.  I can google a bit and find out what's happened - they were appointed to a new position, they've been arrested, or there's some other new story about them.  But this one was more like the time when my post about J's broken ankle suddenly (like overnight), a year or so later, was getting lots of hits.  At that time, a picture of an ankle that I borrowed (with attribution) suddenly got near the top on google image search.  But that one had search terms attached.  I could see what people googled.  The oddest part about this one is that none have had search terms. 

People from around the world finding that post through google:

East Brunswick, New Jersey; Cebu City, Philippines; Jakarta, Indonesia; Songkhla, Thailand; Winter Park, Florida; Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Brampton, Canada are a few of the locations. 

Blog Musings

When I first started blogging I did quite a few posts about my attempts to figure out how to use this blogging medium and my minor struggles and triumphs.  I was learning about blogging and that was a fair topic to cover.  It got me assistance some times and perhaps helped other bloggers.  And I thought it was important for readers who are not bloggers to understand what was going on behind the scenes.

My posts about the process of blogging have been much less frequent lately, in part because I got comfortable with the tools I was using and stopped stretching and learning new tricks.  I'm somewhat ok with that because it allows me to concentrate on other content.  But getting comfortable is also a bad sign.  It means I'm not learning.  And I do need to pay more attention to making the blog more usable.

I've come to realize that I've got a lot of posts (over 4000)  here - google hits to old posts is one way I get the point - including some that are pretty good.  I need to help readers find some of those Golden Oldies - probably using the tabs on top - like the tabs for the Redistricting Board and the Anchorage International Film Festival.  This (these?) tab would give some better organization and guidance to other topics I've covered over the years, but not in the same concentrated way as the Board and the Festival.

I'm telling you all this as a way of committing myself publicly to do it.  So bug me if you don't see any progress in the next couple of months.

Meanwhile go visit the Nobodyhere post.  Or just go directly to the site by clicking on the image below which I took from Nobodyhere. 

 

It's a unique site by a sick (in a brilliantly and positive way) mind in, I'm guessing, Holland.  It's interactive and fun. 

How Do We Screw You? Let Us Count The Ways - Are You in An Abusive Relationship With Your Credit Card Company?

As I read Bank of America's new credit card changes, Elizabeth Barret Browning's famous poem immediately came to mind with slight changes.  It's not good for a business when customers believe they are being screwed by them.  But with fewer options that are mostly the same and Wall Street's pressure for short term profits, businesses are getting meaner.

There are lots of reasons people use credit cards.  It's hard to make airline reservations without a credit card, and if you do, you have to pay more.  It's almost impossible to rent a car without a credit card.  And credit cards make it possible to spend what you don't have.
Banks issuing the cards are not shy about squeezing their customers for all they can get.  The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 made some changes.  The Consumer Finance Protection Bureau summarizes the key changes:

• The long-standing practice of hiking interest rates on existing cardholder accounts has been dramatically curtailed.
• The amount of late fees consumers are paying has been substantially reduced.
• Overlimit fees have virtually disappeared in the credit card industry.
• Consumers report that their credit card costs are clearer, but significant confusion remains.

(Wikipedia notes that an amendment to the bill allowed people to carry firearms in National Parks.)

So the companies are trying to find ways to increase earnings while being in compliance with the Credit Card Act.

Here are some highlights of the changes listed in a letter I got recently.  Some of the most disturbing are at the end.

"Amendment To Your Credit Card Agreement:
Effective Decembr 3, 2013, the transaction fee we assess on each of the transactions identified below will be equal to 5% of each such transaction (Fee:  Min. $10):

• ATM Cash Advance
• Cash Equivalents
• Over the Counter Cash Advance
• Same-Day Online Cash Advance
• Wire Transfer Purchase"

As I understand this, if you get a $10 cash advance using your card, you'll have to pay a $10 fee which is a 100% fee.  The percentage goes down as you get a larger amount.  But the fee doesn't get down to the minimum percentage (5%) until you take $200.  And then you'll pay more in interest.  I guess because they call this a 'transaction' fee, it doesn't count as usurious interest.  (In Alaska that's 10.5% for loans above $25K)

But, there's this option: 

"If you reject this change, it will not apply to your account;"

Hey, that's cool, but only if you stop there.  The rest of the sentence is:

"however, your account will be closed as of the date we process your rejection." 

And, it goes on, you will still have to pay off what you owe us.


TOTAL MINIMUM PAYMENT DUE

"The Total Minimum Payment Due is the sum of all past due amounts plus the Current Payment.

The Current Payment for each billing cycle includes three amounts:

1. 1.00% of your balance (your New Balance Total except for any new interest charges and any new Late Fee)
2. new interest charges
3. any new Late Fee

Your Current Payment will not be less than $25."  

Not less than $25?  What if you you only used the credit card for $10?  It does say next that:

"The Total Minimum Payment Due will not be greater than your New Balance Total"

What am I missing here?  How can Current Payment not be less than $25?  If your New Balance total is $0, and you have no interest charges or late fees, why would you still owe $25?  Does it mean that if you owe less than $25 they won't bill you?  I doubt it.  I suspect they meant, "if your current balance is at least $25."  But maybe I'm just missing something, but if I am, I'm sure others are too. 

The next updates, they say, are language changes.  They say they:

"are updating the language in the following sections to clarify how payments are applied:"  See how clear you think it is.

I'm just going to offer some of the highlights:

"Interest will continue to accrue even though you have paid the full amount of any related balances because we include any accrued but unpaid interest in the calculation of each Balance Subject to Interest Rate"

Here's what I think this means:  Once you don't pay the full amount, we stick you with interest rates (and late fees).  Those accrue daily.  So, when we send out your bill, we only give you the amount due at that moment.  But after we send it out, you are still accruing interest until you pay us.  But we won't tell you that on the bill.  So you think you are finally square with us, but you are still accruing interest on everything.  Ha Ha, good trick isn't it?  Gotcha. 

One way to deal with this is to call them up and tell them you want to pay off everything and stop the interest from continuing to accrue.  You may be able to pay by phone or go to the bank branch.  If you're a long time card holder they may simply waive it.  Or you can ask them how much more will accrue until you can get the money to them and add that to your payment.  But don't use your card for new transactions until it's definitely all paid off, because interest will accrue on every transaction each day.

The Killer Clause

"We will not charge you any interest on Purchases if you always pay your entire New Balance Total by the Payment Due Date.  Specifically, you will not pay interest for an entire billing cycle on Purchases if you Paid in Full the two previous New Balance Totals on your account by their respective Payment Due Dates;  otherwise each Purchase begins to accrue interest on its transaction date or the first day of the billing cycle, which date is later."

"if you always pay your entire New Balance Total by the Payment Due Date."   This really is the only reason for which people should use credit cards if they want to keep out of permanent, ever increasing debt. 

Otherwise, they start charging you nasty interest rates that can double and triple what you actually pay for everything you charge. 

And I didn't realize that you have to pay in full for TWO PREVIOUS NEW BALANCE TOTALS.    This is designed to keep people paying interest as long as possible. 


HOW WE ALLOCATE YOUR PAYMENTS

"If your account has balances with different APRs, we will allocate the amount of your payment equal to the Total Minimum Payment Due to the lowest APR balances first.  Payment amounts in excess of your Total Minimum Payment Due will be applied to balances with higher APRS before balances with lower APRs."

 If they define APR anywhere in this letter, I can't find it.  But I think it means Annual Percentage Rate.  What they seem to be saying is:

If you have account balances with different interest rates and you only pay the Minimum Payment Due, they'll use that to pay the account with the lowest interest rate first. (Even if the other debts are older.)  That way they can still stick you for the higher interest rate longer.  But it appears they give you something - if you pay over the Minimum Payment Due, that amount will go to the higher interest accounts first. 

I'm not sure why they are making that concession, but it would seem to mean that poorer folks, who can't afford to pay more than the minimum, will get stuck paying the higher rates longer. 

USING MOBILE DEVICES

Basically, this part says that if you use your mobile device like a credit card, then when you give your phone to someone else it's like giving them your credit card.  And you're stuck with their bill. 

And they are updating their language about

PEOPLE USING YOUR ACCOUNT

This transfers all responsibility to the card holder.  If you give someone your credit card or phone with credit card capabilities, you are liable for whatever they do with it.

"even if the amount of those transactions causes a credit line to be exceeded"

 "We may send account materials (cards, statements and notices) to any liable party, and that person will be responsible for delivering those materials to the other liable parties and authorized uses.  Notice to any of you will be considered notice to all of you."

So, you have a limit on your card.  Doesn't seem to matter.  What's the point of the limit?

You let your college son on your account?  They could send him the bills and that counts as sending them to you.  If he doesn't pay them or send them to you, you're screwed.

And get this one:

"An authorized user's authority will continue until you both notify us that you are terminating the authority and you physically retrieve the card or other credit device."

So your spouse has walked out and is spending on your joint card.  You both have to terminate his or her authority and you have to retrieve the card?   Good luck with that.

What if you leave the house because your spouses is beating you?

I can't believe that in these situations you couldn't simply terminate the card, which I assume is different from terminating the other person's authority.  But that has its own problems.  What if your abusive spouse terminates the card when you've gone to a shelter?
I can understand that the Bank doesn't want to have to settle marital disputes, but this could have serious consequences for card holders. 

And I doubt that many people read this far, even though it is only page 3.

And why are they making these changes?

"We are making the changes to the Transaction Fees and Total Minimum Payment Due sections because of a change in our business practice."

 That clarifies things.


The basic rules for people with credit cards:

• Don’t charge what you can’t pay back at the end of the month.
• If you must borrow money with a credit card to make ends meet, have a plan for paying the balance off ASAP.

Read more at http://www.moneyunder30.com/how-to-use-a-credit-card-responsibly#UCV8LxWh1QPrwrdp.9

• Don’t charge what you can’t pay back at the end of the month.
• If you must borrow money with a credit card to make ends meet, have a plan for paying the balance off ASAP.

Read more at http://www.moneyunder30.com/how-to-use-a-credit-card-responsibly#UCV8LxWh1QPrwrdp.

• Don’t charge what you can’t pay back at the end of the month.
• If you must borrow money with a credit card to make ends meet, have a plan for paying the balance off ASAP.

Read more at http://www.moneyunder30.com/how-to-use-a-credit-card-responsibly#UCV8LxWh1QPrwrdp.99

• Don't use one unless you plan to pay it off in full every month so you don't accrue interest. 
• It's a way to not carry cash
• It's NOT a way to pay for something you can't afford

There are exceptions - unique situations where you have a short term need for extra cash and you have money coming in soon to pay it all off.  I've heard of any number of film makers saying they paid for their film by getting lots of credit cards.  If you can find cards with a year of 0%, you can pull this off.  But I'm not sure how many of those film makers had a way to pay it off.

Basically, we have to wean ourselves from spending more than we earn.


Russian Turns Tables On Bank

Looking for this agreement online, I did find this story of a Russian who simply crossed out the parts of the credit card offer he got and wrote in his own language - which included things like no interest, no fees, and no credit limits.  He also wrote in penalties for the bank if they broke any of the rules. 

The bank failed to notice the adjustments to the contract and issued him a card and eventually went after him for failing to pay fees and interest.  He won that case in court, but the bank is now suing him for fraud and he's counter suing for all the penalties his contract requires the bank to pay. 

Wheel Good Food And Pretty Good Weather

I did a post that mentioned food trucks when I was in LA and so when I passed this shiny clean truck yesterday, I figured I needed to document that Anchorage is hip too, even if we only have one truck in a location.

You could read the sign in Photoshop, but even if you click the picture you need wheel good eyes to read the menu.  You can see the menus better at the Wheel Good Food website.

The website also gives us some background about this truck (it says there are two trucks actually):

"Wheel Good Food is the brainchild of UAA Culinary Arts School graduate and chef, Kathy Robinson and her husband Richard Geiger.  Providing delicious, gourmet food in their home town, Anchorage, Alaska has long been a goal for this dynamic couple.  With the purchase of their state-of-the-art mobile food truck, Bombolina, named after Kathy’s signature menu item, that goal has become a reality."

I know that the Culinary Institute at UAA serves great food and teaches its students all aspects of from cooking to serving to running a business.  I should have ordered something.  Maybe next Friday when they'll be back at Lake Otis and 40th.

This is Jamey the chef.  

I also noticed yesterday that the geese are still in town.  Here's part of a flock at Waldron Lake.








And some others today at UAA. 

The edges of the clouds hinted that the sun was out there somewhere as I rode over to UAA this morning, though the blue to grey ratio was low. 

During our meeting this rainbow showed up hinting of rain somewhere, but all around there was more blue and less cloud. 


UPDATE October 21, 2013:  Here's the photo that Ropi linked to in the comment of his favorite item at the food truck at his University in Budapest.  Looks really good.

East and West Finally Connected - Very Low Key Opening Of Campbell Creek Bike Trail Under Seward Highway

The sun came out for this ceremony.  There were construction workers and some DOT employees.  A few cyclists and some dogs and walkers.  And Channel 2 and Channel 11 and the Anchorage Daily News had camera folks.  As well as an unnamed blogger.

And there were two Muni employees who'd been working to make this happen since 1991 they said.  This was the culmination of a lot of work - getting this train connected under the Seward Highway.  And now it's done.

It was hard getting good angle without blocking the sun which is already pretty low on the horizon at noon.  It says, "East & West Finally Connected."

The absence of anyone of note - mayor, assembly, representatives, even department heads - or any real ceremony was probably fitting.  The real workers behind making this happen over the long term were probably the two women who had the cake and the blue lemonade container.  Chong Kim, the DOT engineer who has overseen the actual construction, was at a meeting I was told.  There was no ceremony and no ribbon cutting even though this is probably the most ambitious individual bike trail construction project in Anchorage since the Coastal trail was built.  This connected bike paths that were separated by the Seward Highway and its two access roads.  It's true, one could scramble under the old bridges and many did.  The top photo has a picture of the old bridge.  And here are some before and after shots.  But this is a recognition that bike paths do matter. 


There are still some things to work on - crossing Lake Otis for example.  Crossing Dowling was finished this summer.  But this was the biggie - four bridges under a major highway and access roads.  One of the women there from Anchorage Public Works told me there was a $10 million estimate for a similar underpass at Lake Otis.  She smiled wryly when I suggested they use the $20 million allocated to bulldoze Elmore through the University land, a project only the engineers seriously want and all the people living near by strongly oppose.  Money that was put into the state budget in the very last minutes before the state budget was passed this year in Juneau. Over the opposition of all the state and local representatives of the area. 

 

It's hard to take a picture of something that isn't there.  Until yesterday, there was a fence blocking this bridge right here.  For me, the removal of the fence is the real opening of this trail.

Here's what it looked like earlier this week.

These are snow fences to protect the trail and trail users from snow being plowed from the road above.  Technically, they aren't supposed to plow snow from the highway into the creek anyway, but just in case, and to keep other debris falling from the highway off the people below.  

The construction is still going on.  I think they may still need to connect the bike trail on the road above to the bike trail, but it seems it would make sense to do it from the same side of the creek as the trail.  So, I'm not sure what they are doing here.  

And this last shot is from the bridge east of the highway where the fence was removed yesterday.  The cake table is just on this side of the bridge.

You Are My Editor And What Sitemeter Tells Me About You

I once lamented to an Anchorage Daily News reporter that I needed an editor and the reply was, "You don't want an editor!"  I was thinking about someone who would correct my typos and flat out mistakes.  The reporter was thinking of someone who made assignments and set deadlines and cut out things the reporter didn't want cut out.  I guess freedom from an editor, on the whole, is better than getting my typos corrected.

And I have readers who help with the typos.  AKHarpboy leaves comments or sends emails when he catches something.  My mom used to let me know about mistakes when she could still read the blog regularly.  And others chip in now and then and I just want to say thank you.

I also get some unintentional editors - people who come to the site and get to a page that has a typo or needs updating.  Every now and then I'll see that someone went to a page and I can't remember what it was about and I'll look and be appalled to see a glaring typo. (I can tell on Sitemeter where people go.  I've left it open for anyone to look at so you can see what computers know about you.  It's down on the right side column below Blogs Of Friends Or Acquaintances and above Labels.  Just click on the number.)

Here's the page they got me to update the post on people born in 2011.  Vietnamese General Giap was, at that time still alive at 100.   I'd heard the news the other day that General Giap had died and when I saw this inquiry, I realized I needed to update the post.

Here's what that user looked like on my Sitemeter.   (The links don't work because this is a screen shot.)  If you click on the Sitemeter link on the right, click on any of the categories under 'recent visitors' and then click on a number, you'll get a page like this.  Not every page has all the information, I'm not completely sure why, though I know if you browse through a proxy server - this link offers you some examples - you can clean your tracks to some degree. 

 Another post I try to keep current is the one on the number of African-Americans in Congress. This time, though, I was aware there was a likely new Black US Senator and made the changes as they were happening.

Visit Length is often a misleading category.  I've been told that it only has the time until the last page visited.  So if someone only looks at one page, it says '0'.   Experts say there is no way to know how long someone has been there unless they click on something else.  So, if someone visited only one page but clicked out on a link, it would tell me how long she'd been there until she did the link.

But there is a section called "Who's On?" (left column near the top).  That tells me the time they got there.  So even if they've only been on one page, but they are still there I can tell they've been there, say five minutes.  Why can't trackers use that to calculate how long they've been just on one page?  I'm sure it just hasn't been a priority for anyone.

Anyway, to my many editors, THANKS!  You make this a better blog.  Keep those corrections coming in. 

There Are Now Two African-American US Senators

African-Americans make up about 13% of the US population and with today's election of Cory Booker as the new US Senator from New Jersey, their number and percentage in the US Senate has doubled from one to two.


 On this apparently final day of the current round of budget and debt crisis brinkmanship, engineered by, it would seem, the likes of the Koch brothers, their fellow plotters, and their followers (witting or unwitting), it would seem that the election should tell us something about voters' reaction to the Congressional bullying. 

Here are the results:

Overall Result*			99.3% Reporting
Candidate	Party	% of Vote	Vote Count
Winner C. Booker	Dem	54.6%	713,594
S Lonegan	GOP	44.3%	579,388

*Data from Politico as of 1:41am ET

Here, based on the New Jersey State website data on voter registration as of September 2013 are the numbers and percentage of registered voters of the main groups.  (There are a number of small parties that have less than 1% of the population and I've left them out.)

Una	Dem	Rep	Total
2,570,260	1,825,751	1,093,836	5,494,230
47%	32%	20%

So, with 99.3% of the voters counted (I'll round that up to 100%) there werre 1,292,982 votes in this race or 23.5% of registered voters.

Almost half (47%) the registered voters in New Jersey are unaffiliated.
32% are Democrats and 20% are registered as Republicans.


We don't know (at least I haven't found it) what percent of each party voted.  Democrats may have stayed home thinking their candidate had it locked.  Tea Party Republicans would likely have tried to get a larger percentage of their members  But these are just  assumptions.

There's too much missing data about who voted to make any generalizations about whether this election was affected by the Congressional nonsense or whether this can tell us what to expect in the 2014 elections.  My guess is that too much can happen between now and November 2014 to prognosticate how the budget/debt ceiling chicken game will affect them or whether this election can tell us anything.

The only thing I can say is that there doesn't seem to be a backlash against the Democrats or against a statewide Black candidate.