Phillip King Natural Harpist

I ran into Phillip King and his harp at the Virginia Park Farmers' Market in Santa Monica today.   He's playing tomorrow (Sunday January 13, 2013) at Core Church (Washington and Overland) 8:30am, 10:30am, and 12:30pm services.  So I'm getting this up quickly.

This is not your every day harp music.  The International Harp Museum site says:

"The harp is one of the oldest musical instruments in the world. The earliest harps were developed from the hunting bow. The wall paintings of ancient Egyptian tombs dating from as early as 3000 B.C. show an instrument that closely resembles the hunter's bow, without the pillar that we find in modern harps.
The angled harp came to Egypt from Asia in about 1500 B.C. It was built from a hollow sound-box joined to a straight string-arm at an angle. The strings, possibly made of hair or plant fibre, were attached to the sound-box at one end and tied to the string-arm at the other. The strings were tuned by rotating the knots that held them.

 Celtic harp

During the Middle Ages the pillar was added to support the tension of extra strings. Stiffer string materials like copper and brass were used and these changes enabled the instrument to produce greater volume and a longer-sustaining tone. Paintings of these harps appear in many early manuscripts and their shapes hardly differ from those of the Celtic harps that are still played today."

Phillip said his harp is a Celtic harp.  You can hear him playing on this video I took.








He's got a CD too which you can get at his website universalharp.com.

Year Zero - Zombie Invasion

Watching Year Zero at Out North AIFF 2011

I'm not into zombies.  I understand that they are metaphorical in the best zombie stories.  But they generally are not my thing.  So I was surprised by how an animated zombie film at the 2011 Anchorage International Film Festival captured me.

I got to chat with the film maker, Richard Cunningham, who taught himself video making by asking google all his questions and, as he said, learning from 15 year olds who had made Youtube videos answering all questions.

I think what caught my fancy was Richard's unique visuals and music and story.  He spent over a year essentially locked up in his New York City apartment making this.  I suspect that experience helped him write the story and to use his own imagination rather than copying what others have already done.  

So I'm pleased the whole film is now available on line.  Enjoy.



Looking at the link to the Cunningham video, I see it also includes Travis Betz whose vampire musical won the best feature that year. I liked that too. Maybe I've been infected.

Alaska Redistricting 2010 - 2013 Overview

I’ve been going over the Redistricting Board’s petition (see the petition in full below) and sorting out what Michael White, the Board’s attorney, is saying.

During breaks, I’ve been trying to explain it to my wife.  That’s the real test of whether I’m making sense to a normal person who hasn’t kept track of this.  Ultimately, it seems that before jumping into the petition, I need to put up this overview of what's happened so far.  Particularly look at the discussion of the Hickel Process because that is a big part of the back-and-forth between the Court and the Board.

[NOTE OF CAUTION:  Most of this happened a while ago and while I have gone back to old posts to check my memory on some things, there may be some minor errors of fact, but I do think the basic narrative should get people ready to tackle the discussions to come on the Board's petition.  Also, the full petition is at the end of the post.]


WHAT WAS THE BOARD'S TASK?

1.  Divide the state into 40 House districts with each as close as possible to 17,755 people, based on the 2010 Census data.  As soon as the Census data was released in March 2011, they began drawing.


WHAT RULES DID THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW TO DO THIS?

1.  The US Constitution requires one person, one vote.  Thus as mentioned above, each district had to have as close as possible 17, 755 people (the 2010 Census population for Alaska divided by forty districts).  The deviation between the biggest and smallest district could not be over ten percent.  (That means any range from -2% to +8% or -5% to +5%, etc. between the smallest and largest districts.)  Generally though, the expectation is that the deviations should be smaller than 10%, particularly in the cities where it should be no more than 2% or so, because it’s easier to do this where the population density is greater. 

2.  The Federal Voting Rights Act was passed to insure that minority populations are not redistricted in a way that suppresses their representation.  While it was passed with the South in mind, it also applies to Alaska Natives.  Alaska is one of about 16 states which, because of past discriminatory redistricting, are required to get approval of their redistricting plans from the Department of Justice to be sure that minority voting power is not diminished by redistricting.  Thus, the Board was required maintain the same number of districts in which Alaska Natives had the voting clout to elect the candidate of their choice.  How you measure this is complicated and the labels and standards of the 2000 Census morphed somewhat during the process in 2011.  But essentially, the Board was required to maintain the same number of “Native” districts or demonstrate that because of population changes this was not possible. 

3.  The Alaska Constitution requires that each House district be

• compact
• contiguous, and
• socio-economically integrated
• no political gerrymandering

Senate districts are made up of two House districts and need to be contiguous. 

4.  Precedence -  If the Board is unable to meet all three sets of requirements in their final plan, the  US Constitution trumps everything else.  Then comes the federal Voting Rights Act.  Last comes the state’s Constitutional requirements.   So, if worst comes to worst, they might have to violate, to some degree, the Constitutional requirements to meet the other ones. 

There are a few more factors, but these are the ones necessary to understand what is happening in Court right now.


WHAT DID THE BOARD DO? 

The Board reviewed these requirements.  They decided that since they had to get clearance from the Department of Justice (DoJ) before they could finalize their Plan, they decided to focus on getting the Native Districts set first and then to work the rest of the districts around those districts. 

That’s what they did.  There were some problems with contiguity (they separated the Aleutians into two different districts) and compactness (as in the existing districts one huge district, bigger than most US states was spread across the state, and socio-economic integration (a suburb of Fairbanks was paired with off-road Native coastal villages).  There were charges of political gerrymandering in Fairbanks and Anchorage.  When they finished getting all the districts in place they announced their completed Proclamation Plan. 


BOARD ADOPTS PROCLAMATION PLAN.  LAWSUITS FOLLOW.

All during the process there were a number of other groups watching over the process.  Democrats, Republicans, various towns and cities, Native organizations were checking to see how their interests were being affected.  And they were all making their own plans in attempts to show that the various criteria could all be met without violating the state constitution. 

Soon after the Plan was adopted by the Board, there were several law suits filed against the case.  These narrowed down to one from the Fairbanks suburbs of Ester and Goldstream and from the City of Petersburg, which later dropped out, but kept its eye on things.


WHAT DID THE COURT SAY?

The Hickel Process

The Court said a number of things, but of most importance to us now, is that they brought out the Hickel process from a 1994 challenge to a previous redistricting plan.
Then, the Court ruled that the Board needed to first create a plan that divided the state into 40 districts that complied with the state Constitution.  Then, and only then, could the  Board take into consideration the Voting Rights Act.  The current Court’s justification requiring the Board to follow the Hickel process now was:

1. Unless the board creates a map that meets the consitutional requirements first, the Supreme Court, reviewing a plan that deviates from the costitution to meet the Voting Rights Act, won’t be able to see if the deviations were the least possible deviations.
2. The Hickel process makes it harder to hide gerrymandering. 

Problematic Districts

The Court also four districts as unconstitutional - the split Aleutians and two Fairbanks districts.

The Court sent the plan back to the Board and told the Board to redo the plan using the Hickel process.  That is, first create a plan that meets the state constitution.  Then, if necessary, make the least possible deviations from that plan to meet Voting Rights Act requirements.


BOARD REDRAWS THE MAPS - THE HICKEL TEMPLATE HICKEL PLANS

For the Board, the application of the Hickel process seemed to have come out of the blue.  The attorney had gone into great detail at the start about what they were required to do, but never mentioned this section from a 1992 Supreme Court Decision.  I would note that two 2010 Redistricting Board members - Peggyann McConnochie and Marie Greene -  are listed as respondents in that case, Hickel v. Southeast Conference.  

Time was getting tight.  It was the end of March and candidates, who had to file for the August primary by June, needed to know what districts they were in.  The Board had to come up with a new plan, get it cleared by the Department of Justice and then approved by the Alaska Supreme Court. 

Hickel Template from March 26, 2012 Post

The Hickel Template 
The Board decided:
a.  since only a few districts had been identified by the Supreme Court as not being Constitutionally valid
b. they would leave the rest as they were and change the ones that were challenged.

They then came up with what they called the Hickel Template.  It had most of the districts from the rejected plan and then a blank space for the ones that had been challenged.  Most of the state - the North Slope district 40, Anchorage, Southeast, Kenai, and Matsu - were left intact.  The blank space included the Fairbanks area and radiated east and west and north mostly. 

One of the issues was where to get population to make some of the Native districts big enough.  They decided that since Fairbanks had excess population, that would be the best place, which is what they did in the original plan.  So to prove that this made the most sense, they came up with four plans working from the Hickel Template. Each plan tried to get the excess population from a different population center.

•  Fairbanks
•  Kenai
• Anchorage
• Matsu

If I recall correctly, the Anchorage one had part of Anchorage and Bethel in the same House district.

They quickly rejected as not meeting Constitutional requirements all but the Fairbanks plan.  They also rejected plans submitted by some of the outside groups that had been watching the process. 

[As I sat there at those meetings it really seemed to me that the Board never really accepted the Hickel process as a legitimate standard for them to meet, but that they had to go through the process. A video of attorney White after one of the meetings seems to capture that.   It felt staged.  “OK, for the record,  why we are rejecting this plan?” 
Then someone would list the Constitutional problems with the plan for the record.

In a March 26 post I wrote:

Board Chair Torgerson at one point actually said: 

"Just asking the same question ten times to get it on the record."

They seemed to reject out of hand any slight deviation with the non-favored plans, but they accepted without flinching equal or greater deviations on their own favored plan.]

COURT ADOPTS AMENDED PLAN AS INTERIM PLAN

They then sent their revised plan to the Supreme Court for approval.  They also sent off an expedited request to the Department of Justice which approved the plan.  The Court accepted the Amended Proclamation Plan as an interim plan because it was most likely to be approved by the DoJ and the elections were coming soon.  But said the Board would have to use the Hickel process to come up with a final plan.

This Amended Proclamation Plan was the basis for the districts in the 2012 election.


BOARD PETITIONS TO USE AMENDED PLAN AS FINAL, COURT SAYS NO

Sometime later the Board petitioned the Court to use the Amended Proclamation Plan as the Final Plan. 

In late December 2012 the Court rejected the Amended Proclamation Plan on the grounds that the Board did not go through the Hickel Process and ordered the Board to start over for the 2014 election.  There were two dissenters.

The Board has just (January 7, 2013)  petitioned the Court to reconsider that decision.  


COMING SOON TO A BLOG NEAR YOU

I will write about the Board’s petition in the next few days.  This post is intended to give readers enough background to understand the discussion of the petition.


THE COMPLETE BOARD PETITION

 

2013-1-7 ARB Petition for Rehearing by Steve

"When I was 16, I took a hundred foot free-fall off a cliff"

We met Doug LaMarche on the Venice Boardwalk where he was painting his old paint brushes.  It was like a bouquet (you can see another one in the video) with his own concoction of old paint that was thick and waxy looking.

I liked the concept, but these weren't pieces I'd want in my house and so I asked questions about what he thinks makes art 'good' or not.  Soon I asked if I video what he was saying.

He's thought about these issues a lot.  Art is about self-expression.  It's about healing.  And as I looked around, it was clear that the paintbrushes were not, perhaps, the true indication of his art.

This one shows the artist - I didn't write what he said, but something like - doing battle with traditional art standards as he attacks Gainsborough's Blue Boy which was the most expensive painting ever sold, when Californian railroad magnate Henry Edwards Huntington purchased it in 1922. Or so says Wikipedia.   An interesting tidbit I found there related to the great American artist Robert Rauschenberg:

Born on Oct. 22, 1925 in Port Arthur, a small refinery town in Texas near the Louisiana border, Milton Ernest Rauschenberg lived an American dream.  His parents were poor fundamentalists who didn’t dance, drink, or play cards. At the University of Texas in Austin, the teenager was studying pharmacology when World War II began.  Drafted during spring 1944, he ended up, as a pacifist, working in the Navy Hospital Corps in San Diego.
           
On a visit to the Huntington Art Gallery, outside Los Angeles, Rauschenberg found a new direction, and American art history gained one of its most indomitable practitioners. Here the young neuropsychiatric technician saw his first oil paintings. One of them, Gainsborough’s Blue Boy, was familiar. Back home, it had been reproduced on a calendar. Painting pictures, he realized, was something a person could do.

Doug seemed to have a dim view of marriage too.  There were two pieces that questioned the institution.

I think this one was called reflections on weddings or marriage.  

 He pointed out these were all recycled materials.




The next one represents the important role of alcohol to marriage - it either destroys a marriage or keeps it together.













So, at some point I asked if I could turn on the video camera which led to this video below.  There's a lot of truth in what he says.






One thing I didn't do consciously was to film this so it's not obvious he's in a wheel chair.  Maybe it was subconsciously done, because I think it's important to take people as people and not jump to conclusions based on the category we pushed them into.  And I didn't even think about asking how he ended up in a wheel chair.  But another blogger did and it does add to our understanding of Doug's words and to their power.  And the power of art.


Robert Zuckerman writes on a blog post he did on Doug:

"What Happened to you?" I ask.

"When I was 16, I took a hundred foot free-fall off a cliff.  I couldn't do or face anything for seventeen years, then I discovered art.  Now I do and teach Art as Healing."

So, it's might seem sort of hypocritical to use the title I used for this post.  But I suspect a few more people will look at this title than would look at something like, "Art and Healing."  Those are the kinds of conflicting tensions a blogger deals with.  Having titles that are relevant to the post but not so boring as to drive away readers.  

Santa Monica - The Whole City - Is A Free Wifi Zone

We went to Wise and Healthy Aging, a Santa Monica non-profit that acts as a reference for older folks who want to stay in their own homes as independently as possible.  We wanted to see all the options available to my mom.  There are lots of options and we're still going through all the materials to see if we can make things work for her.

But afterward I asked if they had wi-fi - so we could see if there was a movie nearby we wanted to see - and she said, "Yes.  All of Santa Monica is free municipal wi-fi zone." 

I'd heard about that idea, but I've never experienced it before.  Anyone with a lap top or an i-pod touch or similar device that can connect to the internet with wifi is connected, without having to have a smart phone. 

As we walked over to the Santa Monica Promenade - 3rd Avenue is blocked off from cars for four or five blocks -  we passed this bike center which was part of a large parking garage.  They don't just have a few bike racks, they have a whole space for bikes.

The LA Times had a piece not too long ago about all that Santa Monica is doing to encourage people to get out of their cars and onto their bikes.  Given so much flat land and good weather, Santa Monica is a perfect place to bike.




We stopped in the REI and found these electric bikes.  (Is this the first step from car to bike?  Or is this to entice people with bikes to start moving toward a motor?)

The batteries are on the bike racks over the rear tires.  I'd like to think these are just batteries on the bikes that get charged by your biking and you can use for small appliances like your computer at home.  But I think that's probably just wishful thinking.

That morning I'd seen this guy who was using his bike as many Asians have in the past.  I remember people carrying everything - even beds - on their bikes in China.  

This is Venice, not as upscale as Santa Monica.  When I asked if I could take a picture he dug into the 'trunk' and got out his pet pigeon to be in the picture.  It's sitting on the red object.

Before we got to the movie, we passed the Apple store.  It used to be on the other side of the street.  Now it looks like an airplane hanger with dozens and dozens of small tables with iPads and iPad minis. 

I standing across the pedestrian only street so I could get the whole thing in the picture.  I like the idea of the street being car free, but on the downside, it's nothing more than an outdoor shopping mall.  Big name stores you could now find in any city around the world. 

We saw Zero Dark Thirty.  As a movie, it worked for me.  I know there's some controversy over the idea that it promotes the idea that torture gets people talking.  I know movies like this one can have a big impact on how people understand current events.  But I doubt this movie will change people's minds either way on this topic.  Even if one bought the premise that torture worked, it was clear that it is also inhumane.  It shows how it damages not only the person tortured but the person doing the torture.   I thought it was just a good movie. 

Old Harbor Native Corporation's Chief Executive Officer is Carl Marrs

I imagine that most people, when they heard there was a Native village called Old Harbor with a couple hundred people close to where the Kulluk grounded, didn't think much about it. Some sleepy little village where people fish. Not too sophisticated. A place Shell could easily take advantage of. Their website description begins with this paragraph:

Welcome To Old Harbor Old Harbor is an Alutiiq village on Kodiak Island, Alaska approximately 40 air miles from the City of Kodiak on the southeast side of the Island. Old Harbor is one of the Island’s six Alutiiq villages and is primarily inhabited by an Alutiiq population. Old Harbor residents enjoy sharing Kodiak Island's beautiful lands with visitors and their hospitality is legendary. Visitors find residents to be warm, generous, and sincere. Today, the community of Old Harbor has a modern airstrip, a harbor for its fishing fleet and the modern amenities of water, sewer, electricity, internet and satellite services.

But if you poke around on that website you get to their company page which begins:

"Old Harbor Native Corporation (OHNC) is one of 252 Native village corporations established by Congress in 1971 under the terms of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA). ANCSA, which was a purposeful alternative to the Lower 48 reservation system, was the first settlement of its kind between Native Americans and the federal government.  Alaska Natives were provided a corporate structure for holding land and capital, with the freedom to control their own economic and social future.
OHNC was incorporated in 1973 and originally enrolled 329 shareholders under the Act.  Today, there are approximately 335 shareholders residing primarily in Anchorage, Kodiak and Old Harbor, but some as far away as Iceland and Switzerland.
The Corporation’s Board of Directors is tasked with the dual responsibility to grow and manage the assets of the Corporation for the benefit of the shareholders, and preserve and protect the culture and traditions of the community.  A challenging task, indeed."

The Board/Staff page leads you to a link to Chief Executive Officer Carl Marrs:

Cal Marrs with fellow UA Regent Mary Hughes in Juneau

"Carl H. Marrs

Mr. Marrs joined Old Harbor Native Corporation as Chief Executive Officer August 2010.  Carl has been working with Old Harbor Native Corporation since 2005 as an advocate in Juneau and Washington DC on various projects.

Carl was born and raised in Seldovia, Alaska and is an Alutiiq from the South Central Region of Alaska.  He grew up as a commercial fisherman and attended school in Kodiak. He later spent two years in the Marine Corps before returning to commercial fishing. Carl had an extensive career at Cook Inlet Region Inc. (CIRI) working in various capacities from 1973 thru 2004.  In December 2004, Marrs stepped down as the company's president and CEO. He left behind an organization that in his tenure provided record dividend payouts to shareholders, and fulfilled its commitment to enhancing the social welfare of its people.  In addition, he previously worked successfully as owner and operator of Marrs & Company from 2005 thru 2010 which was an investment and consulting company.
Marrs was awarded an honorary degree of Public Service from Alaska Pacific University.  He volunteers his time to a number of community organizations, including Alaska Pacific University, the Boy Scouts of America, and the Boys and Girls Club. Marrs has also served on the boards of the Fiscal Policy Council of Alaska, the Alaska Railroad Corporation, Board of Directors for Key Bank of Alaska, President of the Association of ANCSA CEO’s, Board of Director of the Alaska State Council of Commerce as well as worked with the United Way of Anchorage, Alaska SeaLife Center and the Alaska Oil & Gas Association.  Marrs currently serves as a member on the Board of Regents for the University of Alaska and the Koahinic Broadcasting Corporation," 

Carl Marrs is a powerful figure in Alaskan political and business circles.  He rose through his Native Corporation ranks and has worked closely with all the most influential people in Alaska.

A 2003 Cook Inlet Region Inc. (CIRI) newsletter celebrating Marrs' 30 years service said,

Carl has a reputation as being tough, fair and direct. He has worked hard to earn this reputation, and he is recognized for his negotiating stands and his deal-making skills. A number of our business partners have said they would work with Carl again in a heartbeat because they appreciate his forthright attitude.

A major success for CIRI came from investment benefits Native Corporations  gained thanks to legislation supported by Marrs' friend Ted Stevens.

CIRI's president and chief executive Carl Marrs, who engineered an extraordinarily successful investment in wireless telecommunications, stands to reap $3.8 million, based on Friday's stock prices. Vice presidents Barbara Donatelli, Mark Kroloff, Kirk McGee and Craig Floerchinger will collect $3.3 million each.

The board of directors of the Anchorage-based Native corporation voted 14-1 in favor of the compensation plan at a November meeting, according to Marrs. The board met again Dec. 15 and approved a $314 million cash payout to shareholders based on CIRI's windfall investment in VoiceStream Wireless Corp. and its bullish growth as a company over the past decade. Most of CIRI's 7,000 shareholders received $50,000 checks last week.  (from the Peninsula Clarion)

But not everyone agreed with his approach.  The Peninsula Clarion wrote:

[Former CIRI Chief Exec] Huhndorf ran a highly public campaign in which he openly accused CIRI chief executive Carl Marrs of recklessness and lack of vision. Huhndorf promised to shine a spotlight on what he considers the Anchorage-based company's shaky financial outlook and extravagant spending by management.

The Alaska Supreme Court in a decision which found John Ellsworth guilty of fraud and wilful misconduct costing CIRI millions of dollars, wrote:

Evidence was introduced at trial to show that Carl Marrs was responsible for supervising Ellsworth's management of AIC, but the superior court determined, “Marrs never actively supervised or scrutinized ․ Ellsworth, but rather allowed him carte blanche to manage AIC.”

In any case, Carl Marrs is a man to be reckoned with and if the Kulluk is in Old Harbor territory, it's probably safe to assume that the Old Harbor Native Corporation's interests are being well looked after.  

Bron and Elliott Coming To Brewskies SLC

I met these two guys - Bron Theron and Elliott Peele - making a short promo vid at Venice Beach during my run yesterday.  We talked a bit.  They make movies.  Haven't seen the movies so I don't know how good they are.  But they have some shorts that will show at Brewski's in Salt Lake City January 21.  (Brewski's looks like a Bear Tooth sorta theater with pub and food.)



And here's the link to their movie Primalrap site. Why this post? I think film is the most powerful medium of communication we have so far. Sure, you could argue that the internet is more powerful, but without video content, it would be less powerful. And I'm interested in the people who make movies whether the films are seen by millions or by no one. And I really like the background in the video.

The Kulluk Salvage Is Apparently Over

The latest Kulluk Unified Command Update says that the 

"resources contracted specifically for the salvage operation are in the process of demobilizing."

I'm learning a lot about things I knew nothing about before Shell began drilling for oil in the Arctic.  Does this mean that the salvage stage is over?  The update (#36) says they are now doing assessment. I guess that must be different from salvage.  Time to look up salvage.  From Wikipedia:

Marine salvage is the process of recovering a ship, its cargo, or other property after a shipwreck. Salvage encompasses towing, refloating a sunken or grounded vessel, or patching or repairing a ship. Today the protection of the environment from cargoes such as oil or other contaminants is often considered a high priority.
"Salvors" are seamen and engineers who carry out salvage to vessels that are not owned by themselves, and who are not members of the vessel's original crew. When salvaging large ships, they may use cranes, floating dry docks and divers to lift and repair ships for short journeys to safety towed by a tugboat. The aim of the salvage may be to repair the vessel at a harbour or dry dock, or to clear a channel for navigation. Another reason for salvage may be to prevent pollution or damage to the marine environment. Alternatively the vessel or valuable parts of the vessel or its cargo may be recovered for its resale value, or for scrap.

The International Salvage Union identifies different salvage situations from:

• Fire/Explosion
• Collision
• Grounding
• Breakdowns 

Grounding seems to be the kind of salvage operation the Kulluk had:

Grounding:   many salvage operations involve a response to vessel groundings. Some groundings occur in areas of great environmental sensitivity. The salvage team arriving at the scene must make a rapid assessment of the casualty’s condition and the potential for refloating without further hull damage and loss of cargo. In some instances, it is necessary to discharge part or all of the cargo, in order to free the ship. Much depends on the nature of the grounding site (sand, mud, rock, coral, etc), the extent to which the hull is aground, the degree of damage and a wide range of other operational factors, especially the weather. A forecast deterioration in the weather can have a major influence on the salvage strategy adopted.

Image from Unified Command Update #36

Now the Kulluk is 'safely' tucked away at Kiliuda Bay.  Blogger Phil Munger has been writing a lot about this at Progressive Alaska.  Phil knows a little more about these things than most bloggers because in a past life he's been the harbormaster at Cordova [Whittier.] Phil wondered why the Kulluk wasn't taken all the way to Kodiak.  Let me make some guesses.

• If there is a problem with leakage, they don't want to take it too far so they don't damage too  much area.  (The Update says, though, that there are no signs of leakage.)
• They can do what they are doing without being observed by very many people in Kiliuda Bay, while any reporter can fly easily to Kodiak.

That's the limit of my imagination on that question.  Here's the whole update:

DATE: January 8, 2013 1:45:00 PM AKST

For more information contact:

Unified Command
voice: (907) 433-3417

Update #36: Kulluk Remains Anchored, ROVs Arriving for Assessment

January 8, 2013
ANCHORAGE, Alaska – Unified Command confirmed the following information today:

• The Kulluk remains safely anchored in Kiliuda Bay at its assessment position. There continues to be no sign of leakage in the vicinity.
• Support vessels will remain with the Kulluk during its assessment, while other resources contracted specifically for the salvage operation are in the process of demobilizing.
• Remote-Operated Vehicles (ROVs) are arriving at the Kulluk later today to begin assessing the hull. Divers will be deployed if necessary.
• Unified Command, along with local representation from Old Harbor Native Corporation, are surveying the area to obtain GPS coordinates that will enable the recovery of lifeboats and other debris from the Kulluk. Time and weather permitting, the team today will begin collecting debris from the shoreline.

Unified Command also released the map of the Kulluk’s final tow route (shown below), which shows the revised path avoiding the cod pots in the Gulf of Alaska.

Puffin Ice

When I got out of the Kulluk news briefing last Thursday, there was an ice carver working on two huge ice puffins.  I didn't take notes, but I think his name was Mike.

I think he said his name was Mike

Ice carving tools

Restorative Justice : "she described the experience as a 'complete relinquishment of anger, hatred and the desire for retribution and revenge.'”

I first heard the idea of restorative justice discussed in depth at a conference in India.   I wrote at the time:

Jirgas - The Pakistani equivalent of the Panchayat, though I think these are made up of village elders who may not be elected. While some cases have brought international condemnation of jirga decisions, conference attendees argued that millions of decisions are made regularly that generally satisfy both parties. Some conference presenters talked about restorative justice as an alternative to retributive justice. Instead of punishment being the object, making the victims whole is the object. However, when the discussion got to Jirgas, making the victims whole included things such as: A male member of the family has murdered someone. To make the victim's family whole, a sister of the murderer is given to the victim's family. One presenter, a very articulate Pakistani attorney, argued that this does not come from Islamic law, but from tribal law. Such verdicts have caused Jirgas to be outlawed, but they still exist and fill an important need.
But the idea of letting the victims and the perpetrators be part of resolving the crime seems to make sense. 

My daughter emailed me a NYTimes article on restorative justice. A long ten page article about a nineteen year old who killed his girlfriend after they had argued for 38 hours.  The girl's dying words to her father were to forgive her boyfriend.  Both families knew each other well.  The young man's father went to the hospital when he got the word, before he went to see his son.

The article describes the long process of finding a restorative justice expert who could help the Florida prosecutor set up a process that the State could accept.  It's a story we should all think about when we ponder all the people in prisons in the United States.  There are a lot of push-button emotional issues in this stories.  And the comments are also well worth reviewing.  

This is a unique case where all the right pieces were in place.

I think the key, counter-intuitive result of forgiveness in this case, is what it does to those who forgive, more than what it does to the person forgiven.

The Grosmaires said they didn’t forgive Conor for his sake but for their own. “Everything I feel, I can feel because we forgave Conor,” Kate said. “Because we could forgive, people can say her name. People can think about my daughter, and they don’t have to think, Oh, the murdered girl. I think that when people can’t forgive, they’re stuck. All they can feel is the emotion surrounding that moment. I can be sad, but I don’t have to stay stuck in that moment where this awful thing happened. Because if I do, I may never come out of it. Forgiveness for me was self-preservation.”

The story ends with:

“Forgiving Conor doesn’t change the fact that Ann is not with us. My daughter was shot, and she died. I walk by her empty bedroom at least twice a day.” 

But then if Conor had been executed, her daughter would still have been dead and she would still walk by her empty bedroom each day.  

Oh, the quote in the title is about "Sujatha Baliga, a former public defender who is now the director of the restorative-justice project at the National Council on Crime and Delinquency in Oakland."  She, herself, was the victim of abuse from her father.  She talked to the Dalai Lama about her anger for an hour.

He gave her two pieces of advice. The first was to meditate. She said she could do that. The second, she says, was “to align myself with my enemy; to consider opening my heart to them. I laughed out loud. I’m like: ‘I’m going to law school to lock those guys up! I’m not aligning myself with anybody.’ He pats me on the knee and says, ‘O.K., just meditate.’ ” 

 But later, in a ten day meditation class.

On the final day, she had a spontaneous experience, not unlike Andy Grosmaire’s at his daughter’s deathbed, of total forgiveness of her father. Sitting cross-legged on an easy chair in her home in Berkeley, Calif., last winter, she described the experience as a “complete relinquishment of anger, hatred and the desire for retribution and revenge.” 

Restorative Justice is not a cure-all.  It may work in some circumstances and not others.  Most often probably, in combination with our current system.  And some people will game the system, because some people game whatever system they are in.  But would that be worse than what we have?  

The whole article, "Can Forgiveness Play a Role In Criminal Justice?" by Paul Tullis,  is here.