There are a lot of vendors at the Business of Clean Energy in Alaska Conference. Here's one, Philip Kithil of Atmocean, Inc., discussing the wave technology his company is developing and which he thinks has great potential for small communities on the ocean. He's planning to test it in Yakutat.
Pages
- About this Blog
- AIFF 2024
- AK Redistricting 2020-2023
- Respiratory Virus Cases October 2023 - ?
- Why Making Sense Of Israel-Gaza Is So Hard
- Alaska Daily COVID-19 Count 3 - May 2021 - October 2023
- Alaska Daily COVID-19 Count - 2 (Oct. 2020-April 2021)
- Alaska Daily COVID-19 Count 1 (6/1-9/20)
- AIFF 2020
- AIFF 2019
- Graham v Municipality of Anchorage
- Favorite Posts
- Henry v MOA
- Anchorage Assembly Election April 2017
- Alaska Redistricting Board 2010-2013
- UA President Bonus Posts
- University of Alaska President Search 2015
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Jerry Yudelson - "Evangelist for the Obvious" - Energy Conference
This is the lunch talk. Let me disclose that my media pass for this conference includes lunch. Margie Bauman of Alaska Newspapers, Inc. won't accept a free lunch. But as 'just a blogger' my standards aren't that high. But I'll let you know that I'm getting fed so you can decide for yourself if it's corrupting me. And since I'm posting this as it's happening, please forgive the typos and lack of better organization.
Technical stuff is relatively easy. My energy now is focused on showing people why this is good business.
Here are the Takeaways:
1. Global Warming is happening - Green building is important for controlling CO2 production
2. Green design/development is here to stay
3. Benefits are signicatnt for all building types
4. Cost premium is down - now 2% or lower for large green buildings - for all the benefits, is not a bad deal
What is a green building?
energy efficient
land use and materials
Works better for people
Tested and certified by independent 3rd party
Performance verification - next trend in green building
We have lots of green buildings that don't perform as they should.
Business Case
CBRE/U San Diego
55% said gained in productivity - just the gain of productivity offsets energy costs
45% said fewer sick days - pays back
US is growing - Europe isn't
We're going to rebuild most of our building stock - just by building we make a huge impact
Life cycle postive solutions
Only things where you reduce carbon is building efficiency investments
US Green Building Association is the fastest growing non-profit in the US.
28,000 LEED registered projects
7,000 LEED certified projects
155,000 LEED accredited professionals - way over the number of architects in US. It means we've got the trained people. Now need to sell it to business.
This green building is growing during worst building crisis in 30 years.
We need to attack existing buildings, because we only add about 1% of building stock a year. Economy based on cars. Not cars and drugs, not manufacturing (that's gone to China), but buildings. Not just the low hanging fruit, it's the fruit on the floor.
Merchandising Mart - largest US building - and now Empire State Building is going through LEED refitting. Replacing all the windows - 100 a night. You don't have to accept a bad building. You can remanufacture and reinstall all the windows. Empire State Building has a five year payback. $4.4 million a year savings.
First Green Building in Massachusetts - tech company - turnover dropped 5% and that alone paid for the energy upgrade. People like to be in good buildings.
Co-Star study: Compared their LEED buildings to non-LEED - $11.33 sf premium and 4% occupancy premium. And LEED buildings, even in the recession, had a rent and occupancy premium. Alaska is different, but happening over the US and Europe. It will happen here too.
Productivity - studies showing 3% increase of productivity in LEED buildings. 1% already pays for the investment.
Here's a bit of video:
Q&A: Energy storage is big future issue. California desert now used as military bombing site could be solar farm to energize the US. And Europeans are looking at Northern Africa for solar. Once off the coast "there's nothing there." [Well, they say the same about the arctic. NOT TRUE. They may well be able to use it reasonably, but there is stuff there that needs to be taken into consideration.]
I feel like an evangelist for the obvious. [Yes, that's how I feel about all this - it's obvious.]
Yudelson eating before talk |
Technical stuff is relatively easy. My energy now is focused on showing people why this is good business.
Here are the Takeaways:
1. Global Warming is happening - Green building is important for controlling CO2 production
2. Green design/development is here to stay
3. Benefits are signicatnt for all building types
4. Cost premium is down - now 2% or lower for large green buildings - for all the benefits, is not a bad deal
What is a green building?
energy efficient
land use and materials
Works better for people
Tested and certified by independent 3rd party
Performance verification - next trend in green building
We have lots of green buildings that don't perform as they should.
Business Case
CBRE/U San Diego
55% said gained in productivity - just the gain of productivity offsets energy costs
45% said fewer sick days - pays back
US is growing - Europe isn't
We're going to rebuild most of our building stock - just by building we make a huge impact
Life cycle postive solutions
Only things where you reduce carbon is building efficiency investments
US Green Building Association is the fastest growing non-profit in the US.
28,000 LEED registered projects
7,000 LEED certified projects
155,000 LEED accredited professionals - way over the number of architects in US. It means we've got the trained people. Now need to sell it to business.
This green building is growing during worst building crisis in 30 years.
We need to attack existing buildings, because we only add about 1% of building stock a year. Economy based on cars. Not cars and drugs, not manufacturing (that's gone to China), but buildings. Not just the low hanging fruit, it's the fruit on the floor.
Merchandising Mart - largest US building - and now Empire State Building is going through LEED refitting. Replacing all the windows - 100 a night. You don't have to accept a bad building. You can remanufacture and reinstall all the windows. Empire State Building has a five year payback. $4.4 million a year savings.
First Green Building in Massachusetts - tech company - turnover dropped 5% and that alone paid for the energy upgrade. People like to be in good buildings.
Co-Star study: Compared their LEED buildings to non-LEED - $11.33 sf premium and 4% occupancy premium. And LEED buildings, even in the recession, had a rent and occupancy premium. Alaska is different, but happening over the US and Europe. It will happen here too.
Productivity - studies showing 3% increase of productivity in LEED buildings. 1% already pays for the investment.
Here's a bit of video:
Q&A: Energy storage is big future issue. California desert now used as military bombing site could be solar farm to energize the US. And Europeans are looking at Northern Africa for solar. Once off the coast "there's nothing there." [Well, they say the same about the arctic. NOT TRUE. They may well be able to use it reasonably, but there is stuff there that needs to be taken into consideration.]
I feel like an evangelist for the obvious. [Yes, that's how I feel about all this - it's obvious.]
"We were spending $4 in energy for every soda sold from our vending machines"
The quote above from Coast Guard Commander Steve Raney. See below.
[Notes are pretty rough, but that's the tradeoff for doing this in almost real time.]
Jes. B. Chrisensen,
Managing Director,
Danish Board of District Heating,
Copenhagen, Denmark
"Shaping a Low-Carbon World: Lessons from Denmark"
1979 - Denmark told all
Waste to energy
Denmark is the only country in the EU that is energy independent. Very conscious of energy efficiency, lowest energy consumption per capita. Expensive? It's an investment, but not expensive in the long run. We've grown economically since 1980 grown about 70% and kept our energy consumption fixed. And reduced 02 emissions.
In order to go this way to decentralized solutions, it had to be cost effective. Business has grown with net reduction in energy consumption. Doesn't have to be ugly or expensive.
Use less
Recycle what's out there
Replace it with renewables
Smart Grid - not just electricity, including thermal load. Smart Energy Infrastructure.
This guy is way beyond the previous speakers in terms of the kinds of savings he's talking about. District energy systems
In Copenhagen, 30% of the heat demand is from Municipal waste. Paris it's about 50%. In Iceland they use geothermal. The best part is that you make money doing this. Greening the economy will create huge export opportunity. Less hit by recessions. And we're still green and competitive. And we're happy. (Slide showing Denmark is the happiest nation.)
Juergen Korn
Research & Development Project Manager
Yukon Housing Corporation
Whitehorse, Yukon Territory
"The Road to More Efficient Housing in Yukon"
A rough road so far, but we're making headway. I work in the intersection of Policy, Planning, Good Intentions, and Reality. I'm passionate about housing. Not all positive, but a reality check. We only have 30,000 people in Yukon. Lots of space and have to rely on each other.
Yukon Housing Corp.
Housing biggest problem in the north. Mold and moisture big issues. Mandatory new home certification problem has been a problem. R2000 issues from past we are still fighting. We launched our own program - Green Home - provided low interest financing, energy auditing - for existing and new housing. Federal grants.
Graph of rising energy costs. Oil going up and people coming to us - what do I do? I can't afford to heat AND feed kids. We were worried people would walk away from homes because of heating costs. Would cause our own housing crisis. We looked at heating costs of different kinds of homes. Graph of heating costs of different types of construction. People in 2x4 and 2x6 home paying $4 - 6,000 a year to heat. Most effective approach is add good insulation. Looking at cost of constructing energy efficient housing, increased mortgage cost - $20,000 more - but energy cost way down.
Turns out that better off from day one to put in huge amounts of insulation - energy costs are so much less. Now homeowners are demanding that we only do super energy efficient houses. City of Whitehorse is now commited to Energy Bylaw - requirements for insulation, windows, ventilation, etc. City has lack of inspection resources. Work with them to develop checklists and train inspectors so that no moisture problems in highly insulated houses.
Lessons Learned
1. Tremendous economic opportunities for energy efficient homes
2. Time is running out. Feel great urgency.
Steve Raney
Commanding Officer
US Coast Guard Civil Engineering Unit
Juneau
"Powering Forward: Coast Guard Strategies for Energy Security"
[What I got out of this once more - we waste a ton of energy and there are lots of easy ways to make buildings and cities way more efficient and save lots of energy.]
Federal Mandates Coast Guard must meet.
Advanced metering. First just electricity, but other sources now.
Obama - EO 13514 - Got attention of Senior Officers
Apoint Sr. Sustainability Officer,
Strategic SustainabilityPlans,
Operational Sustainability Plans
Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Reduction Goals
2007 - moved to Honolulu - reduced consumption by 14%, but because of increasing fuel prices, costs still increased 28%. Water costs up 250%
Demand Response: We'd disconnect four ship when grid was in trouble. Incentivized us 25% and only one event, so great deal for us. Since then more incidents.
Relamping of ships and delamping. Efficiency. Replace lighting in boat house, cut power needs in half and got better lighting. Reduced power requirements by 80%. I'm sure those numbers are right. Used saved money for training - vending and water conservation. Put data on vending machines. We were spending $4 in energy for every soda we sold. Got rid of underutilized machines, delamped them. Saved $10K a year just on vending machines in one base in Honolulu.
Water savings in shower heads.
Persistence in savings. Retro Commissioning. 14 contracts, $100 million invested. Kodiak, $26million invested. Heating plant system - optimization of boiler. Residential housing boiler replaced. Water treatment plant. Finished before sedimentation issue and could survive that contamination problem. Performance contracts underway.
QA: From Alaskan Housing person: We have infrastructure of Yukon and would like the cogeneration of Denmark. How do we do cogen.
Christensen: We went from very centralized to decentralized. We calculate you can go down to 200 single family homes. You don't need the dense, highly populated system. That's our experience, can't say it will work here. Went from 30% market share to 60% market share, because government mandated efficiency levels. We did make mistakes. Installed in places where they shouldn't have been installed. Very important to include building codes.
[Notes are pretty rough, but that's the tradeoff for doing this in almost real time.]
Jes. B. Chrisensen,
Managing Director,
Danish Board of District Heating,
Copenhagen, Denmark
"Shaping a Low-Carbon World: Lessons from Denmark"
1979 - Denmark told all
Waste to energy
Denmark is the only country in the EU that is energy independent. Very conscious of energy efficiency, lowest energy consumption per capita. Expensive? It's an investment, but not expensive in the long run. We've grown economically since 1980 grown about 70% and kept our energy consumption fixed. And reduced 02 emissions.
In order to go this way to decentralized solutions, it had to be cost effective. Business has grown with net reduction in energy consumption. Doesn't have to be ugly or expensive.
Use less
Recycle what's out there
Replace it with renewables
Smart Grid - not just electricity, including thermal load. Smart Energy Infrastructure.
This guy is way beyond the previous speakers in terms of the kinds of savings he's talking about. District energy systems
In Copenhagen, 30% of the heat demand is from Municipal waste. Paris it's about 50%. In Iceland they use geothermal. The best part is that you make money doing this. Greening the economy will create huge export opportunity. Less hit by recessions. And we're still green and competitive. And we're happy. (Slide showing Denmark is the happiest nation.)
Juergen Korn
Research & Development Project Manager
Yukon Housing Corporation
Whitehorse, Yukon Territory
"The Road to More Efficient Housing in Yukon"
A rough road so far, but we're making headway. I work in the intersection of Policy, Planning, Good Intentions, and Reality. I'm passionate about housing. Not all positive, but a reality check. We only have 30,000 people in Yukon. Lots of space and have to rely on each other.
Yukon Housing Corp.
Housing biggest problem in the north. Mold and moisture big issues. Mandatory new home certification problem has been a problem. R2000 issues from past we are still fighting. We launched our own program - Green Home - provided low interest financing, energy auditing - for existing and new housing. Federal grants.
Graph of rising energy costs. Oil going up and people coming to us - what do I do? I can't afford to heat AND feed kids. We were worried people would walk away from homes because of heating costs. Would cause our own housing crisis. We looked at heating costs of different kinds of homes. Graph of heating costs of different types of construction. People in 2x4 and 2x6 home paying $4 - 6,000 a year to heat. Most effective approach is add good insulation. Looking at cost of constructing energy efficient housing, increased mortgage cost - $20,000 more - but energy cost way down.
Turns out that better off from day one to put in huge amounts of insulation - energy costs are so much less. Now homeowners are demanding that we only do super energy efficient houses. City of Whitehorse is now commited to Energy Bylaw - requirements for insulation, windows, ventilation, etc. City has lack of inspection resources. Work with them to develop checklists and train inspectors so that no moisture problems in highly insulated houses.
Lessons Learned
1. Tremendous economic opportunities for energy efficient homes
2. Time is running out. Feel great urgency.
Steve Raney
Commanding Officer
US Coast Guard Civil Engineering Unit
Juneau
"Powering Forward: Coast Guard Strategies for Energy Security"
[What I got out of this once more - we waste a ton of energy and there are lots of easy ways to make buildings and cities way more efficient and save lots of energy.]
Federal Mandates Coast Guard must meet.
Advanced metering. First just electricity, but other sources now.
Obama - EO 13514 - Got attention of Senior Officers
Apoint Sr. Sustainability Officer,
Strategic SustainabilityPlans,
Operational Sustainability Plans
Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Reduction Goals
2007 - moved to Honolulu - reduced consumption by 14%, but because of increasing fuel prices, costs still increased 28%. Water costs up 250%
Demand Response: We'd disconnect four ship when grid was in trouble. Incentivized us 25% and only one event, so great deal for us. Since then more incidents.
Relamping of ships and delamping. Efficiency. Replace lighting in boat house, cut power needs in half and got better lighting. Reduced power requirements by 80%. I'm sure those numbers are right. Used saved money for training - vending and water conservation. Put data on vending machines. We were spending $4 in energy for every soda we sold. Got rid of underutilized machines, delamped them. Saved $10K a year just on vending machines in one base in Honolulu.
Water savings in shower heads.
Persistence in savings. Retro Commissioning. 14 contracts, $100 million invested. Kodiak, $26million invested. Heating plant system - optimization of boiler. Residential housing boiler replaced. Water treatment plant. Finished before sedimentation issue and could survive that contamination problem. Performance contracts underway.
QA: From Alaskan Housing person: We have infrastructure of Yukon and would like the cogeneration of Denmark. How do we do cogen.
Christensen: We went from very centralized to decentralized. We calculate you can go down to 200 single family homes. You don't need the dense, highly populated system. That's our experience, can't say it will work here. Went from 30% market share to 60% market share, because government mandated efficiency levels. We did make mistakes. Installed in places where they shouldn't have been installed. Very important to include building codes.
Clean Energy Conference 2011 - Designing for Energy Efficiency and the Bottom Line
[Double click any picture to enlarge it]
David Johnson, West Coast Director, William McDonough + Partners, San Francisco
I had trouble tracking all this. The room is too bright to see the slides well. He basically talked about a couple of his projects - a NASA building in Mt. View California and a Bosch building in Holland and in general terms the need to use energy and material sustainably. Much of this is, it seems, chronicled in a book called Cradle to Cradle.
As affliuence grows, your energy footprint increases. What energy footprint, what if the world consumed as the people in Alaska.
Book Cradle to Cradle
Biological nutrient vs. Technical nutrients = is it composable, where does it go? As architect, planner, look at what happens to materials in buildings. If we start with LEAD checkbooks. If all were in LEAD platinum, we'd be in trouble. How can you plan for a platform of continuous quality improvement.
Over time, decreasing use of fossil fuels and increasing renewable resources.
Want to define beneficial outcome, not just reducing the bad.
Efficient building - NASA - keep all the trees. Locate building to get most efficient environment - optimized for wind and sun, retain existing landscape. All office is passive ventilation.
[My notes here on Kim Matsoukas, Sustainability Manager at Bentley Prince Street, Industry, California got wiped out. Sorry. Her talk was on Energy Efficiency as a Corporate Mission outlined how her company had invested in and saved from energy efficiency in California where energy is also costly. They aren't worried about greenhouse gas regulations because they have already reduced their footprint.]
[UPDATE 11:30pm: I found some of my notes from this presentation.
Kim Matsoukas, Sustainability Manager, Bentley Prince Street, Industry, California. She's talking about Ray, the founder of Prince Street, as background for her talk.
Our mission is Mission Zero. Goal since 1994. Thought we could do it by 2000, Wasn't possible, now by 2020. We have seven principles:
Eliminate Waste
Benign Emissions
Renewable energy
Closed Loop
Integrated sustainability
Redesigned Commerce
Our approach:
1 Measure energy use and GHGs both facility-wide and by total product footprint (including suppliers)
2. Look for conservation opportunities
3. Look for energy efficiency opportunities - change lightbulbs, upgrade equipment to be more efficient
4. Use renewable energy
5. Offset unavoidable emissions
6. Educate our associates, customers, and suppliers - life-cycle principles means it happens before it gets to our doors.
There was a lot more. . . ]
Rob Pratt, Chair and CEO of Greener U, Waltham, MA.
Keys to Using Energy Efficiency as an Economic Stimulus.
What I wanted to do with Greener U was show that Colleges and Universities could reduce energy consumption - you have students pushing, presidents' commitments, etc. Help colleges implement large scale efficiency programs. Mechanical equipment side together with people. It's all about people. Student engagement. Colleges are doing phenomenal things. Reducing carbon footprint by 25% - goals much higher. Could do the same here.
60-70% cheaper
Creates Homegrown jobs
It's everywhere - all organizations and buildings
National Security - reduce energy use, not sending $ overseas
Building Blocks
Big Energy Savers
Cogeneration - can really get efficiency up - I suspect big opportunity in Alaska. Also can use multiple fuel sources. Natural gas, Methane, wood chips, etc.
Paying for Energy Efficiency - can pay with savings example: put 1.2 over five years (big university) based on that got $2million in utility incentives. Instead of using savings, reinvest them. Then, over 5 years, $3million in Green donations, then take some out of endowment. You get a $24 million project with no debt except $3million endowments. Lots of ways to be creative. In Alaska lots of possibilities.
It just calls for us to do it.
Economic Engine for Alaska, just waiting to be turned on. Create jobs, catelyze economic development. Big picture, as Murkowski alluded to, Alaska is rated as 37th in US, up from 41. Alaska doesn't spend much, 5th from the bottom, on energy savings. But Housing efficiency program is good. Creates a lot of jobs and companies. Lots of opportunities in homes. A lot can be done in homes. Heating, insulation, windows, etc. Then in commercial, industrial, etc.
Plumbers and electricians do well working on energy efficiency. You've got housing energy rebate program. Lots of opportunities at University of Alaska. Energy program for villages. A lot can be done on efficient appliances. Lots going on you an take advantage of.
They are asking questions now. One was about how cutting consumption would hurt manufacturers. That's a basic contradiction in our national economic model - we need to save and we need to spend. There are those who are developing models for more sustainable capitalism.
David Johnson, West Coast Director, William McDonough + Partners, San Francisco
I had trouble tracking all this. The room is too bright to see the slides well. He basically talked about a couple of his projects - a NASA building in Mt. View California and a Bosch building in Holland and in general terms the need to use energy and material sustainably. Much of this is, it seems, chronicled in a book called Cradle to Cradle.
As affliuence grows, your energy footprint increases. What energy footprint, what if the world consumed as the people in Alaska.
Book Cradle to Cradle
Biological nutrient vs. Technical nutrients = is it composable, where does it go? As architect, planner, look at what happens to materials in buildings. If we start with LEAD checkbooks. If all were in LEAD platinum, we'd be in trouble. How can you plan for a platform of continuous quality improvement.
Over time, decreasing use of fossil fuels and increasing renewable resources.
Want to define beneficial outcome, not just reducing the bad.
Efficient building - NASA - keep all the trees. Locate building to get most efficient environment - optimized for wind and sun, retain existing landscape. All office is passive ventilation.
[My notes here on Kim Matsoukas, Sustainability Manager at Bentley Prince Street, Industry, California got wiped out. Sorry. Her talk was on Energy Efficiency as a Corporate Mission outlined how her company had invested in and saved from energy efficiency in California where energy is also costly. They aren't worried about greenhouse gas regulations because they have already reduced their footprint.]
[UPDATE 11:30pm: I found some of my notes from this presentation.
Kim Matsoukas, Sustainability Manager, Bentley Prince Street, Industry, California. She's talking about Ray, the founder of Prince Street, as background for her talk.
Our mission is Mission Zero. Goal since 1994. Thought we could do it by 2000, Wasn't possible, now by 2020. We have seven principles:
Eliminate Waste
Benign Emissions
Renewable energy
Closed Loop
Integrated sustainability
Redesigned Commerce
Our approach:
1 Measure energy use and GHGs both facility-wide and by total product footprint (including suppliers)
2. Look for conservation opportunities
3. Look for energy efficiency opportunities - change lightbulbs, upgrade equipment to be more efficient
4. Use renewable energy
5. Offset unavoidable emissions
6. Educate our associates, customers, and suppliers - life-cycle principles means it happens before it gets to our doors.
There was a lot more. . . ]
Rob Pratt, Chair and CEO of Greener U, Waltham, MA.
Keys to Using Energy Efficiency as an Economic Stimulus.
What I wanted to do with Greener U was show that Colleges and Universities could reduce energy consumption - you have students pushing, presidents' commitments, etc. Help colleges implement large scale efficiency programs. Mechanical equipment side together with people. It's all about people. Student engagement. Colleges are doing phenomenal things. Reducing carbon footprint by 25% - goals much higher. Could do the same here.
60-70% cheaper
Creates Homegrown jobs
It's everywhere - all organizations and buildings
National Security - reduce energy use, not sending $ overseas
Building Blocks
Big Energy Savers
Cogeneration - can really get efficiency up - I suspect big opportunity in Alaska. Also can use multiple fuel sources. Natural gas, Methane, wood chips, etc.
Paying for Energy Efficiency - can pay with savings example: put 1.2 over five years (big university) based on that got $2million in utility incentives. Instead of using savings, reinvest them. Then, over 5 years, $3million in Green donations, then take some out of endowment. You get a $24 million project with no debt except $3million endowments. Lots of ways to be creative. In Alaska lots of possibilities.
It just calls for us to do it.
Economic Engine for Alaska, just waiting to be turned on. Create jobs, catelyze economic development. Big picture, as Murkowski alluded to, Alaska is rated as 37th in US, up from 41. Alaska doesn't spend much, 5th from the bottom, on energy savings. But Housing efficiency program is good. Creates a lot of jobs and companies. Lots of opportunities in homes. A lot can be done in homes. Heating, insulation, windows, etc. Then in commercial, industrial, etc.
Plumbers and electricians do well working on energy efficiency. You've got housing energy rebate program. Lots of opportunities at University of Alaska. Energy program for villages. A lot can be done on efficient appliances. Lots going on you an take advantage of.
They are asking questions now. One was about how cutting consumption would hurt manufacturers. That's a basic contradiction in our national economic model - we need to save and we need to spend. There are those who are developing models for more sustainable capitalism.
Business of Clean Energy in Alaska Conference 2011 - Murkowski
I'm at the Business of Clean Energy in Alaska conference at the Denaina Center.
Lisa Murkowski just spoke following welcome comments from Lt. Governor Mead Treadwell and Renewable Energy Alaska Project executive director.
She began by saying the key is to both more energy production and reduction of energy use. There are more than 27,000 homes that need weatherization upgrades and sorry that this wasn't funded again. Better in helping homeowners affording jumps in energy prices. Live heat did relatively well in the budget. The debate going ahead in Congress will be with critical eye to the budget, it will be tough for us here in the state. Whether weatherization, live heat or federal money to advance our clean energy technologies. We need to be independent to futher build out our renewable energy technologies. It's not a shortage of resources. Was in Chevak and Hooper Bay to see the wind turbines beginning to offset those energy prices - not there yet, but will be. We have best hydro electric potential in the nation. Already 28 projects in state which provide about 24% of our energy. Ocean potential. These could potentially produce 3 times more than we currently consume. We have 33,000 miles of coastline. We need to learn to tie into it. No shortage of resources, but turning them into energy. We've seen CIRI's frustration with getting energy companies to sign on on Fire Island. Red tape by NEPA for Naknek projects.
Three hydro bills - last one calls all environmentally acceptable?? projects as renewable energy.
We're onto the first panel now.
Lisa Murkowski just spoke following welcome comments from Lt. Governor Mead Treadwell and Renewable Energy Alaska Project executive director.
She began by saying the key is to both more energy production and reduction of energy use. There are more than 27,000 homes that need weatherization upgrades and sorry that this wasn't funded again. Better in helping homeowners affording jumps in energy prices. Live heat did relatively well in the budget. The debate going ahead in Congress will be with critical eye to the budget, it will be tough for us here in the state. Whether weatherization, live heat or federal money to advance our clean energy technologies. We need to be independent to futher build out our renewable energy technologies. It's not a shortage of resources. Was in Chevak and Hooper Bay to see the wind turbines beginning to offset those energy prices - not there yet, but will be. We have best hydro electric potential in the nation. Already 28 projects in state which provide about 24% of our energy. Ocean potential. These could potentially produce 3 times more than we currently consume. We have 33,000 miles of coastline. We need to learn to tie into it. No shortage of resources, but turning them into energy. We've seen CIRI's frustration with getting energy companies to sign on on Fire Island. Red tape by NEPA for Naknek projects.
Three hydro bills - last one calls all environmentally acceptable?? projects as renewable energy.
We're onto the first panel now.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Bridgman/Packer Ticket Contest
Myrna Packer |
I got to talk with Art Bridgman and Myrna Packer at a gathering tonight at SubZero. And with Scott Schofield, the Out North executive director.
So, Scott has given me a free ticket for one of you readers. Since you all know there is no such thing as a free ticket, here's the deal.
Art Bridgman |
First person to email me a copy of your receipt for nine tickets* to Bridgman/Packer gets a tenth ticket free. But you have to buy them after this post is published. Just get nine of your friends (enemies are ok too, but after this they may not be enemies) to pool together to buy tickets as a group, and I can add the tenth ticket if you are the first to email the receipt showing you bought nine tickets after the time of this post. Include a name, email address, and phone number.
Note for whiners and troublemakers (not that any read this blog): One receipt for nine tickets, not several receipts that add up to nine tickets. Let's not make this complicated, though I know that people can think up all sorts of contingencies I haven't thought of. If you do, I reserve the right to determine the fair winner.
(Note: if no one sends in a receipt for nine tickets, I'm guessing Scott might let me give that ticket to the first person to email me a receipt for the biggest block of tickets over five or six. For example, someone sending a receipt for seven tickets at 5pm on Wednesday will beat a person with a receipt for six tickets at 2pm Wednesday. The contest ends when I verify a purchase of nine tickets or about 4 hours before the performance of the largest block purchase below nine. So, if the biggest block is for 8 for Saturday, I'll announce about 3pm on Saturday.)
Think of this as a party with your friends.
And as I was preparing this I found some Bridgman/Packer video. I wasn't going to post video because the best way to go is with no expectations, but watching the video I was reminded why I am so excited about seeing them again and I thought it might spur some folks to get their friends together to see the Friday and/or Saturday performance. I'd recommend Friday, because when you see how amazing they are, you'll still have a chance to see them again on Saturday.
This video is from a piece they did last time they were here.
Bridgman/Packer Dance: "Under The Skin" (composite video) from Bridgman/Packer Dance on Vimeo.
Ticket information here.
What's in it for me? First and foremost, I think it would be a waste if the Discovery Theater weren't filled up both nights. The only reason someone shouldn't be trying to buy tickets is that they don't know these performers are in town. And I want Out North to make money off this so they will take similar financial risks in the future to bring great performers to Anchorage.
And there were light tricks coming home along the Chester Creek bike trail.
Bethel and Glennallen - Your Turn With the Redistricting Board Today
Wednesday, March 27, 2011
Bethel folks - Board Members PeggyAnn McConnochie and Marie Greene will be at the Yup'itPiciryarait Culural Center in Bethel from 10am to 12 noon. Bethel is in District 38 in both of the Board's options. This district goes all the way from Kwigillingok through Bethel to Lime Village and Tyonek and Sleetmute on up to McGrath and then to Anderson, Ferry, Healy and Cantwell.
Click the + at the bottom of the map frame to enlarge.
AK Redistricting BoardOp1Dist38
Glennallen folks - At the same time (10am - 12noon) Board member Jim Holm and board executive director Ron Miller will be at the Glennallen Legislative Information Office in Glennallen.
In the draft plan, you are in District 6, the largest district in the state (I believe in the USA).
It goes from Southwest Alaska (Holy Cross, Anvik) up north (Wiseman, Venetie) over and around Fairbanks (Nenana, Manley Hot Springs, Ester) and then down along the Canadian Border (Eagle) south to Chitina and McCarthy.)
AK Redistricting Board Op1Dist6
Even if you don't understand any of this, if you have time, I encourage you to go to the meeting, look at the maps, and ask questions. When they aren't taking testimony, you can talk to them one-on-one.
Bethel folks - Board Members PeggyAnn McConnochie and Marie Greene will be at the Yup'itPiciryarait Culural Center in Bethel from 10am to 12 noon. Bethel is in District 38 in both of the Board's options. This district goes all the way from Kwigillingok through Bethel to Lime Village and Tyonek and Sleetmute on up to McGrath and then to Anderson, Ferry, Healy and Cantwell.
Click the + at the bottom of the map frame to enlarge.
AK Redistricting BoardOp1Dist38
Glennallen folks - At the same time (10am - 12noon) Board member Jim Holm and board executive director Ron Miller will be at the Glennallen Legislative Information Office in Glennallen.
In the draft plan, you are in District 6, the largest district in the state (I believe in the USA).
It goes from Southwest Alaska (Holy Cross, Anvik) up north (Wiseman, Venetie) over and around Fairbanks (Nenana, Manley Hot Springs, Ester) and then down along the Canadian Border (Eagle) south to Chitina and McCarthy.)
AK Redistricting Board Op1Dist6
Even if you don't understand any of this, if you have time, I encourage you to go to the meeting, look at the maps, and ask questions. When they aren't taking testimony, you can talk to them one-on-one.
Labels:
Alaska,
change,
politics,
redistricting
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Matsu Residents Sound Unhappy with Redistricting Board Plans
Andrew Wellner of the Frontiersman reports Matsu people pretty unhappy with the Board's plan, here's the beginning of his piece:
PALMER — Redistricting plans riling up public opinion in the state came to the Valley Monday and attendees almost all seemed to have one thing in common — they don’t like either of the redistricting board’s proposals.Read the whole piece here.
“We don’t feel either option one or option two serve our borough,” said Mat-Su Borough Mayor Larry DeVilbiss, expressing an opinion arrived at around the assembly table.
Both options call for drastic revisions to the lines carving up the borough, and both would add a fourth state House district. But most agreed that number should be five, and that the two districts representing pieces of the borough — an Anchorage seat also represents the Butte and the Valdez seat includes Chickaloon and Sutton — should be used somehow to make that district.
Steve Colligan, Wasilla resident and vice chairman of the Alaska Republican Party, said both plans don’t serve “any other consideration other than gerrymandering.” He asked that the board look at borough assembly district boundaries.
Board chair John Torgerson noted that the same U.S. Census that prompted the state to redraw its lines will prompt the borough to redraw assembly districts.
“To use those now wouldn’t be worth much,” he told Colligan.
Labels:
Alaska,
change,
politics,
redistricting
Here's part of a PR email I got this morning. It's for a new Alaska Science site and I'm sure there might be some readers who will be interested in this.
I believe scientists share blame for the decline in thinking abilities in the US. They have often been so preoccupied with getting and spending their research money, that, with a few exceptions, they haven't taken responsibility for making sure our schools teach our children to be competent to think like scientists think when appropriate, or even just to understand what scientists do. Things like:
So, it's good to see even little efforts such as this new website and hope that it makes a small contribution to recovering some of those lost to simplistic black and white, good and evil narratives of the world.
Fairbanks, Alaska (April 26, 2011) – A University of Alaska Fairbanks scientist has launched a National Science Foundation-supported website, Frontier Scientists, to connect Alaska field scientists with those curious about Arctic discoveries.Frontier Scientists shares first-person accounts and real time insights from leading archeologists, grizzly bear biologists, volcanologists, climate change specialists and other scientists.The site features fascinating footage of current scientific discoveries in some of the Arctic’s most remote and dramatic landscapes, chronicled in short vodcasts, Twitter feeds, blogs and web reports. The research is organized into six categories:
• Grizzlies
• Petroglyphs
• Paleo-Eskimo
• Cook Inlet Volcanoes
• Alutiiq Weavers
• Climate Change Watch
I believe scientists share blame for the decline in thinking abilities in the US. They have often been so preoccupied with getting and spending their research money, that, with a few exceptions, they haven't taken responsibility for making sure our schools teach our children to be competent to think like scientists think when appropriate, or even just to understand what scientists do. Things like:
- basic thinking skills that people of a democracy need to make good election choices,
- ability to understand what science and theories are and can and cannot do,
- understanding the complexity of the world and seeking 'truth'
- understanding the differences between scientific and emotional truths, and
- how to spot rhetorical fallacies.
So, it's good to see even little efforts such as this new website and hope that it makes a small contribution to recovering some of those lost to simplistic black and white, good and evil narratives of the world.
Delta Junction and Tok, Nome and Kotzebue, Unalaska and Cold Bay - Your Turn with Redistricting Board Today, Tuesday
The Board members are headed out in pairs Tuesday, April 26 and altogether they'll visit 6 locations. They've completed two options for the draft plan. Now they have until June 14 to submit a final plan. So now is your chance to tell them what's good and bad about what they've done with your districts.
The board will have statewide maps to hand out at the meetings and lots of maps on the wall, but if you want the detailed maps of your own districts go to their website where you can download pdf files and print them out. Click for the option 1 maps and the option 2 maps.
You can get maps of the current districts here.
According to staff, board chair, John Torgerson, former legislator from Fairbanks, and board member Bob Brody, a Kodiak Realtor, will be in Delta Junction and Tok.
Delta Junction folks - Your meeting is 10 - 12 noon at the Delta Junction City Council Chambers. In Option 1 you are in District 2 and in Option 2 you are in District 12.
The proposed districts go from almost Fairbanks along the mainly on the east of the Richardson Highway to Valdez and most of Prince William Sound except for Whittier.
BrdOp1Dist2
The only difference I can tell is that Option 2 includes a lot of land with few if any people - much of it around the Denali Highway almost to Cantwell. You can get a pdf of District 12 here.
Tok folks - Your meeting is from 3pm - 5pm at the Tok Legislative Information Office. Your district 6 is the super district. It goes from Southwest Alaska (Holy Cross, Anvik) up north (Wiseman, Venetie) over and around Fairbanks (Nenana, Manley Hot Springs, Ester) and then down along the Canadian Border (Eagle) south Chitina and McCarthy.)
AK Redistricting Board Op1Dist6
Board members Marie Greene, CEO of Nana Regional Corporation from Kotzebue, and PeggyAnn McConnochie, a realtor from Juneau, will be visiting Nome and Kotzebue.
Nome Folks - 10am - 12 noon at the Nome City Council Chambers. Nome is in District 39 in both options and in both looks to be pretty much the same. The district is the far West including Shishmaref, Wales, Diomede, Nome, down to Hooper Bay and Russian Mission.
AK Redistricting Board Option 1 - Dist39
Kotzebue folks - You're scheduled for 3pm to 5pm at the NW Arctic Borough Assembly Chambers. You're in District 40 which looks pretty much like your old district. It includes the far North from Buckland and Kotzebue, Point Hope, to Kaktovik.
AK Redistricting Brd Op1Dist40
The last team consists of Board Member Jim Holms, former legislator from Fairbanks and Board executive direction Ron Miller. They're scheduled for Unalaska and Cold Bay.
Unalaska folks - You're on from 1pm to 3pm at the Unalaska City Council Chambers. You are in District 37 which looks the same in both options. You're gaining a chunk of the old District 38 which includes Quinhagak, Goodnews Bay, and Platinum from the 2001 Districts and part of the old 36 on the west which includes: Port Alsworth, Nondalton, Newhalen, Iliamna, Igiugig, and Pedro Bay.
Cold Bay folks - Your meeting is 7pm - 9pm at the City of Cold Bay Community Center. You are in the same district as Unalaska - 37 - so the map above applies to you too.
So, what should you do at these meetings? The Board hasn't given out a lot of information, but you can check out the criteria they are using on their website and see if the maps meet the redistricting guidelines. These are things like: socio-economic cohesion, compactness, and equal sizes for all districts with minimum deviation.
The Alaska Redistricting Board tab above lists all the other posts I've done on the board with short descriptions.
The board will have statewide maps to hand out at the meetings and lots of maps on the wall, but if you want the detailed maps of your own districts go to their website where you can download pdf files and print them out. Click for the option 1 maps and the option 2 maps.
You can get maps of the current districts here.
According to staff, board chair, John Torgerson, former legislator from Fairbanks, and board member Bob Brody, a Kodiak Realtor, will be in Delta Junction and Tok.
Delta Junction folks - Your meeting is 10 - 12 noon at the Delta Junction City Council Chambers. In Option 1 you are in District 2 and in Option 2 you are in District 12.
The proposed districts go from almost Fairbanks along the mainly on the east of the Richardson Highway to Valdez and most of Prince William Sound except for Whittier.
BrdOp1Dist2
The only difference I can tell is that Option 2 includes a lot of land with few if any people - much of it around the Denali Highway almost to Cantwell. You can get a pdf of District 12 here.
Tok folks - Your meeting is from 3pm - 5pm at the Tok Legislative Information Office. Your district 6 is the super district. It goes from Southwest Alaska (Holy Cross, Anvik) up north (Wiseman, Venetie) over and around Fairbanks (Nenana, Manley Hot Springs, Ester) and then down along the Canadian Border (Eagle) south Chitina and McCarthy.)
AK Redistricting Board Op1Dist6
Board members Marie Greene, CEO of Nana Regional Corporation from Kotzebue, and PeggyAnn McConnochie, a realtor from Juneau, will be visiting Nome and Kotzebue.
Nome Folks - 10am - 12 noon at the Nome City Council Chambers. Nome is in District 39 in both options and in both looks to be pretty much the same. The district is the far West including Shishmaref, Wales, Diomede, Nome, down to Hooper Bay and Russian Mission.
AK Redistricting Board Option 1 - Dist39
Kotzebue folks - You're scheduled for 3pm to 5pm at the NW Arctic Borough Assembly Chambers. You're in District 40 which looks pretty much like your old district. It includes the far North from Buckland and Kotzebue, Point Hope, to Kaktovik.
AK Redistricting Brd Op1Dist40
The last team consists of Board Member Jim Holms, former legislator from Fairbanks and Board executive direction Ron Miller. They're scheduled for Unalaska and Cold Bay.
Unalaska folks - You're on from 1pm to 3pm at the Unalaska City Council Chambers. You are in District 37 which looks the same in both options. You're gaining a chunk of the old District 38 which includes Quinhagak, Goodnews Bay, and Platinum from the 2001 Districts and part of the old 36 on the west which includes: Port Alsworth, Nondalton, Newhalen, Iliamna, Igiugig, and Pedro Bay.
Cold Bay folks - Your meeting is 7pm - 9pm at the City of Cold Bay Community Center. You are in the same district as Unalaska - 37 - so the map above applies to you too.
So, what should you do at these meetings? The Board hasn't given out a lot of information, but you can check out the criteria they are using on their website and see if the maps meet the redistricting guidelines. These are things like: socio-economic cohesion, compactness, and equal sizes for all districts with minimum deviation.
The Alaska Redistricting Board tab above lists all the other posts I've done on the board with short descriptions.
Labels:
Alaska,
change,
politics,
redistricting
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)