Sunny Day in Juneau

DELTA Meeting in Juneau, Alaska

I'm here in Juneau for a steering committee meeting for DELTA, a Center for Disease Control (CDC) funded project to do an assessment of the needs and resources in Alaska for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) prevention and to develop a state plan. I've posted on two previous meetings here and here. We've met a couple of times as a steering committee already. We now have an initial draft of the needs and resources assessment. There really is relatively little good data for evaluating much more than the actual incidence of intimate partner violence - and what we have there is a low count, data on people who report incidents.

A key problem is confidentiality. In small Alaskan villages just a couple of pieces of demographic data can identify someone, so attempts to get enough data to develop correlations between violence and other factors is very difficult.

Another issue we discussed and have discussed before is the dividing line between prevention and intervention. CDC money now is focused on prevention, but it seems there is a loosening of the resolve to create absolute separations. Intervention is seen is work done after there is a problem, prevention is work to prevent incidents in the first place. But if you work with children in a family where there was violence is that prevention (keeping the kids from repeating their parents' behaviors) or intervention (working the kids through the traumas they have experienced as witnesses)?

But I'm encouraged (again) by the wide experience, knowledge, and general reasonableness and understanding of the various group members, who represent different levels of prevention work - from the immediate village/urban prevention activities to policy makers and researchers.

Jocelyn was here from Atlanta to see what we were doing and to offer insights from the CDC perspective of what we're doing. According to her, we're well along on our project and that our initiative is impressive. We have to talk to people from the other DELTA project states and see if she tells them the same thing

Baranof Suite 604

Since I'm in Juneau I'm missing the Kott trial. ADN's coverage said that yesterday the jury heard the opening statements.

Kott even says on one of the tapes, "I sold my soul to the devil," Marsh said.

I did stay at the Baranof last night and took this picture of the room number where the tapes were recorded.

Juneau Pictures 2 - Biking to Mendenhall Glacier

Jonathan on the bridge.

Mendenhall Glacier through the spokes.

The path got a little wet part of the way.

Biking through the moss.

Talking to tourists at the Glacier.

Juneau Pictures 1

Sky and his mom walking the rainy night streets when I got in.

We stopped by at the youth center where Michel works.

Then in the International Hostel that Michel manages.

Downtown Juneau, the cruise ships are the biggest buildings in town.

Walking Juneau - this is a house across the street from the Governor's house.

Michel showing me the land he's building his house on.

Fairchild 24G at Anchorage Airport

It was raining in Anchorage when Joan dropped me at the airport. Good prep for Juneau. As I had lots of time, I did some walking around and saw this plane I hadn't looked at carefully before. I've put a picture of the sign for those who are interested in such things. I left it a fairly large file in case you want to click on it and read it. Also, the airport is designed so that on a clear day, Denali (Mt. McKinley to non-Alaskans) is framed exactly in the window at the end of this terminal.

Asiemut - Biking from Mongolia to Calcutta

Last night we got a lot more than we expected. We thought we were going to see a movie about a bike ride from Mongolia to Calcutta, India. We didn't know that the film makers - and bike riders - would also be there.



A delightful young couple from Quebec, they introduced the movie, and then a couple of times in the middle they talked about their trip and used the movie to help illustrate their points. The name - AsieMut - is a combination azimuth (azimut, I think in French) and Asie (Asia in French). It was a fun evening and a reminder that we can do much more than we think we can.

Blog Office

It's September already. Soon this office will have to be closed until spring. But in the meantime, it's my favorite place to work.

Kott Trial Day 3 - Behind the Scenes

After the trial was recessed til Monday, I went up to the clerk's office to see if I could find the ruling about press being able to bring their cell phones past security and to use their computers in the courtroom. I couldn't.

They even leave the lobby with the computers open while the office is closed for lunch. I wasn't able to find the order I was looking for. But the docket is full of motions and orders. It looks like this:





I left this a pretty big file so you could click on it and enlarge it if you actually wanted to read it. There are 18 items on the docket just since September 1. Here are the last few.


And here are the official minutes for today.

I'm going to miss the first two days of the actual trial because I'm going to a meeting in Juneau of the statewide steering committee for the Delta project on preventing intimate partner violence in Alaska. So check out www.adn.com for the latest news of the trial. Lisa Demer is there almost all the time.

Kott Trial Day 3 - Jury seated, Trial Resumes Monday

U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska
Court Calendar for Friday, September 7, 2007

9:00 AM 3:07-CR-00056-01-JWS

Judge Sedwick Anchorage Courtroom 3
USA vs. PETER KOTT
TRIAL BY JURY - DAY 3

I didn't get to the courtroom til 11:15am today. By then there were twelve or thirteen people sitting in the jury seats - just two two men, one African-American, a few who might be Alaska Native or Hispanic or Asian, most white - and twenty five more sitting in the audience. They were selecting the alternates. The basic questions they were answering were about where they lived, jobs, hobbies, bumper stickers, have they written letters to the editor, kids, prior jury duty, education level.

When they were done, each side had two peremptory challenges left. They gave them to the clerk who then showed the opposing attorneys. My notes are confusing here. I think four names were read. Two people sitting in the jury box were excused and two who had just been interviewed as alternates. Of the later two, the older woman with the GED was excused and the truck driver with the Marine Corps stickers was excused. Then three or four more names were picked randomly to fill in the 12 jurors and 4 alternates. A lot of the jury pool had been eliminated before I got there. It appeared to me that woman who said yesterday that shea nd her husband were friends of Ben Stevens was gone.

Then the judge gave an overview to the jury. This is a criminal case brought by the government. The indictment is only a set of charges and does not indicate guily.

Government must prove its case byond a reasonable doubt. Not beyond all possible doubt. The jury must be convinced by the evidence or lack of evidence.

The government has the burden to prove that the defendant is guilty.

The defense has no obligation to prove innocence - they need not present any evidence if they so choose.

There will be opening statements - Monday. These are not evidence, but rather they will describe what evidence they will show and why it is relevant. The government will will direct examine the witnesses, the defense can cross examine, and possibly more.

After the government, the defense may present, but is under no obligation.

Then closing arguments. Again, this is not evidence. Since the government must prove its case, it goes first, then defense, and the government last.

The decision of the jury must be unanimous. You are the sole determinants of the facts. The law will be given by the court, you determine the facts. And only from the evidence given, not from other sources. Don't consider anything heard outside the courtroom. Avoid contact with the news media. If you want to read the sports section, have someone else go through the paper and pull out anything about the trial. The media are doing their job, but it isn't what they think, but what you think that matters. Don't do any other research, all must make their decisions based on the same evidence.

You can judge what the witnesses say based on their ability to see, hear, or know things they talk about, their memory, their manner, their interest in the outcome, whether they contradict themselves or are contradicted by others.

No remark I make should be interpreted as my opinion. If I admonish a lawyer, you should have no prejudice against the lawyer.

Don't worry about the sentence, only whether the defendant is guilty or not. My job is to deal with the sentence.

Don't discuss the case with anyone, even the other jurors, until you begin deliberations.

We'll run from 9am to 4:30pm, with 10-15 minute breaks in the morning and afternoon. We'll break for lunch as close to noon as we can. Jury should be back at 1:15 and we resume at 1:30.

Pay close attention. There is no written transcript. You must rely on your memories. You may take notes, but keep them to yourself until you're in the jury room. You'll leave your notes in the court when you go home. We'll provide paper and pens.

(I'm sure I left some minor details out, and I hope this fairly represents what the judge said.)

Q: I live in Kodiak, can I go home this weekend? A: Yes [My question - who pays for transportation and housing for jurors who have to travel to Anchorage?]
Q: How long will the trial take? A: At longest, til the end of the month. My estimate is two weeks or less.

At 11:50 am the jury was excused til Monday morning.

After the jury left, there was discussion among the attorneys and the judge.

The government is going to provide evidence that Dave Dittman conducted political polls for Kott that were paid for by Bill Allen and/or Rick Smith. The defense wants to present as evidence that Allen and Smith paid Dittman for polls about a number of other candidates they were interested in and this was a legitimate business interest of theirs. They did this as individuals and not as Veco. The government argued this was irrelevant. They are supposed to either resolve this or submit motions.

As best as I could tell, some of the tapes have been 'minimized' which from the discussion, I understood to mean, the recordings were turned off and there are missing portions. There was already a stipulation that FBI agents who did the recording would be available to the defense. But the defense wanted them to be there for six or seven sections so they could explain why the tapes were turned off, what rules they had for what to record or not record. It was suggested by the judge, I think, that the defense was free to call them as witnesses for the defense. Attorney Wendt said he did not want to call the FBI as witnesses. The judge said he couldn't tell the government whom to call as witnesses. They will file motions tonight and tomorrow so the judge can rule before the opening statements on Monday.

The court recessed around 12:20pm until Monday at 9am. After I asked Lisa Demer if the government had said whether they were going to call Bill Allen and Rick Smith of Veco as witnesses. She said, no, they have until 4:30 to file that.