"First, the vast majority of mass shooters in our study experienced trauma and exposure to violence at a young age. The nature of their exposure included parental suicide, physical or sexual abuse, neglect, domestic violence and/or severe bullying. . .
Second, practically every mass shooter we studied had reached an identifiable crisis point in the weeks or months leading up to the shooting. . .
Third, most of the shooters had studied the actions of other shooters and sought validation for their motives. . .
Fourth, the shooters all had the means to carry out their plans. . . "
They go on to list ways to prevent such shootings. Basically:
- remove access to good locations by adding more security
- remove access to guns
- remove the notoriety they seek and get from the media
- remove barriers to reporting people for people who see signs of potential violence*
- much more education about mental health and how to cope and get help in all schools
*This is in contrast to the article that friends of the Ohio shooter broke off from him when he DID show signs, but apparently they didn't tell police until after the shootings.
But let's remember that the NRA not only leans hard on its Republican (and a very few Democratic) members of Congress to prevent banning any weapons or adding any restrictions to getting weapons, BUT just as pernicious is their successful ban on government agencies doing research on gun violence. If you can't do research, you can't show the impact of guns on society. Fortunately, there are some non-governmental research who continue to study gun violence.
In the 2016 election cycle, Open Secrets tells us the NRA spent $839,574 on Congressional candidates.
In 2018 (not a presidential election year), they spent $711,654.
Here's what they spent on Alaskan members of Congress in 2016.
| Name | Office | Total Contributions |
|---|---|---|
| Young, Don (R-AK) | House | $6,950 |
| Murkowski, Lisa (R-AK) | Senate | $4,500 |
| Sullivan, Dan (R-AK) | Senate | $2,000 |
And let's remember the NRA, which used to be an organization of hunters and gun collectors that taught gun safety, is now an organization funded significantly by the gun industry.
How many shootings will it take until half the voting population personally knows someone who died in a mass shooting? Will we change the laws then?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be reviewed, not for content (except ads), but for style. Comments with personal insults, rambling tirades, and significant repetition will be deleted. Ads disguised as comments, unless closely related to the post and of value to readers (my call) will be deleted. Click here to learn to put links in your comment.