 |
| Child's Glacier |
 |
| Million Dollar Bridge |
Saturday, July 30, 2011
Cordova Sampler - Bear, Bridge, Ice, Wedding
This is just a sneak preview. We spent a spectacular two days at the Child's Glacier then got back into town today for the wedding of Joe Senungetuk and Martha Hoover. More on all this later, but here's an appetizer.
Friday, July 29, 2011
About the Mendacity of the Press Then [and now] from Zola
Another quote - much shorter - from The Lacuna.
[Pre-posted in advance.We should be out of contact when this goes up.]
"But newspapers have a duty to truth," Van said.
Lev clucked his tongue. "They tell the truth only as the exception. Zola wrote that the mendacity of the press could be divided into two groups: the yellow press lies every day without hesitating. But others, like the Times, speak the truth on all inconsequential occasions, so they can deceive the public with the requisite authority when it becomes necessary."
[Pre-posted in advance.We should be out of contact when this goes up.]
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Historical Antecedents to Mayor Sullivan’s “Safe Mayor” Ordinance
Anchorage's Mayor Sullivan proposed a "Safe Sidewalk" ordinance, but I think it's more aptly titled a "Safe Mayor" ordinance. It appears to be aimed at stopping one man from protesting the Mayor's anti-homeless crusade. [Looks like it didn't pass for now.]
First he cleared out the homeless camps in the greenbelts. More recently he’s asked the Assembly to pass a law banning sitting or lying on the sidewalk downtown, very clearly in response to a homeless man who has been doing that in protest of the Mayor. He called it, I believe, “Safe Sidewalks” ordinance. I'm calling it the Safe Mayor ordinance.
Kingsolver tells us of another time when the poor - veterans of WW I who hadn’t gotten their war bonus - sat in protest in Washington DC. Sullivan, when asked if he would meet with the protester, said something like, “No. If this guy wants to talk to me, he can clean up and dress decent and make an appointment like everyone else.”
Knowing history helps put today into context. While technology has changed greatly, individual human behavior hasn’t. I’m reading Barbara Kingsolver’s The Lacuna while we’re here in Cordova. Much of it takes place in the 1930s, in Mexico and the US. She weaves in the current history of the day. The incident below brings to mind Mayor Sullivan’s recent crusdade against the poor in Anchorage. But there’s more that resonates with today. Depression. Congress turning down bills to help the poor. It’s all happened before.
My posts are more complicated than some people think they should be. I make them so, because life is complicated. Things need to be put into context. And what I write has much less context than they need, but more than one usually gets in mainstream media. So bear with me here as I put this in context. And note, by some coincidence, part of the events take place on July 28, 1932 and the date of this post is July 28, 2011. Given the number of google hits with, “If I were born in 1908, how old would I be today?” I know that not everyone who gets to this blog can figure out that (1932) was 80 years ago. That’s just a lucky bonus.
The main character of The Lacuna is Harrison Shephard, the son of an American bureaucrat and a Mexican mother, who returned to Mexico with Harrison when he was very young. He’s now 15 and Mom’s sent him back to his dad to go to school in Washington DC. It’s 1932.
Kingsolver throws in lots of little details, but they all seem to be there for a reason. They set us up for little comments later in the story. Here’s one that’s relevant to the quotes later.
We’re off to Childs Glacier for a couple of nights and, I assume, out of contact with the world. I'll post one more ahead for tomorrow.
First he cleared out the homeless camps in the greenbelts. More recently he’s asked the Assembly to pass a law banning sitting or lying on the sidewalk downtown, very clearly in response to a homeless man who has been doing that in protest of the Mayor. He called it, I believe, “Safe Sidewalks” ordinance. I'm calling it the Safe Mayor ordinance.
Kingsolver tells us of another time when the poor - veterans of WW I who hadn’t gotten their war bonus - sat in protest in Washington DC. Sullivan, when asked if he would meet with the protester, said something like, “No. If this guy wants to talk to me, he can clean up and dress decent and make an appointment like everyone else.”
Knowing history helps put today into context. While technology has changed greatly, individual human behavior hasn’t. I’m reading Barbara Kingsolver’s The Lacuna while we’re here in Cordova. Much of it takes place in the 1930s, in Mexico and the US. She weaves in the current history of the day. The incident below brings to mind Mayor Sullivan’s recent crusdade against the poor in Anchorage. But there’s more that resonates with today. Depression. Congress turning down bills to help the poor. It’s all happened before.
My posts are more complicated than some people think they should be. I make them so, because life is complicated. Things need to be put into context. And what I write has much less context than they need, but more than one usually gets in mainstream media. So bear with me here as I put this in context. And note, by some coincidence, part of the events take place on July 28, 1932 and the date of this post is July 28, 2011. Given the number of google hits with, “If I were born in 1908, how old would I be today?” I know that not everyone who gets to this blog can figure out that (1932) was 80 years ago. That’s just a lucky bonus.
The main character of The Lacuna is Harrison Shephard, the son of an American bureaucrat and a Mexican mother, who returned to Mexico with Harrison when he was very young. He’s now 15 and Mom’s sent him back to his dad to go to school in Washington DC. It’s 1932.
Kingsolver throws in lots of little details, but they all seem to be there for a reason. They set us up for little comments later in the story. Here’s one that’s relevant to the quotes later.
[p. 86]“President Hoover is the greatest man ever lived,” [Father] said, overly loud. People looked. “They’ve just had a telephone put in on his desk, for calling his chief of staff. He can get MacArthur quick as snapping his fingers. You think your president of Mexico has a telephone on his desk?”
Mexico will be held as a grudge, then. Probably for reasons to do with Mother. Ortíz Rubio [President of Mexico] does have a telephone; the newspapers say he can’t make a move without ringing up Calles first, at this house on the Street of Forty Thieves in Cuernavaca. But Father didn’t want to hear about that. People ask without wanting to know. . . [Yes, this kid is wise beyond his years.]
[pp. 96-7] May 5, [1932]
“A woman in a headscarf held up a naked baby toward our trolley. The baby waved its arms. A hobo jungle is unlike other jungles, where monkeys howl through the leafy air. “What do they all want?”
“What does anybhody want? Something for nothing acourse.” . . .
“But why so many of them? And all the flags?”
“They’re war vetarans. Or so they say, because vets are entitled to a soldier’s bonus . they want their bonus.”
Ragged men stood at military attention every few meters, like fence posts all along the edge of the camp facing the street. Veteran soldiers, you could tell it from the placment of feet and shoulders. But their eyes searched the passing trolley with a terrifying hunger. “They’ve been here all week? What do the families live on?”
“Shoe leather soup, I’d say.”
“Those men fought in France, with mustard gas and everything?”
Father Nodded. . .
So, can’t they get their money now, if they fought in the war?”
“I’d have been there too in the Argonne,: he said suddenly turning pinkish, “if I could have been. Did your mother tell you I wouldn’t fight in the war?”
A subject to steer around. “What’s the soldier’s bonus suppsed to be?”
Surprisingly, Father knew the answer: $500 a man. He is a bean counter for the government. Five hundred bucks for risking a life in the war, so they could begin a new one here. Congress turned them down, decided to pay out the bonus later when these men are old. So they’ve come here from everywhere, wishing to take the matter up with the president.
“Does Mr. Hoover mean to meet with them?”
“Not on our life. If they want to talk to him, they better use the telephone.”McArthur’s troops are out with tanks, but Patton’s cavalry men on horseback get through the blocked streets easier.
[p. 106]
July 28, 1932“Between the stone wall and the crush of shoulders, it was hard to breath. Over the sea of heads and hats you could catch sight of cavalrymen leaning down from the waist, on their horses, flailing their saber blades against whatever was below them.
Against people. That hit with a shock. They were beating at the Bonus Army men and women with razor-sharp blades of sabers.”
[p. 107]July 29Oh, yes, One more Hoover telephone comment. A joke this time:
It’s all in the newspapers today. . .
Gallinger Hospital filled to overflowing with the casualities. Any Bonus Marchers who made it to the Eleventh Street bridge joined the ones at the reiverbank encampment. Mr. Hoover sent orders for troops to stop at the bridge, but MacArthur “couldn’t be bothered with new orders” so he mounted machine guns on the bridge and led a column of infantry across the Potomac into the encampment. They set flaming torches to the canvas and pasteboard homes. Exactly as Cortés said it: Much grieved to burn up the people, but since it was still more grievous to them, he determined to do it. [Remember, Harrison grew up in Mexico and he’d been reading about Cortés’ conquering the Aztecs.]
The late extra: After sunset yesterday the flames in the Anacostia encampment rose fifty feet in the air and spread to the surrounding woods. Six companies of firemen were required to defend adjacent property. The president observed from the White House windows an unusual glow in the eastern sky, and conceded MacAruther was right to proceed with the routing. In his opinion the Bonus Army consists of Communists and persons with criminal records.
President Hoover asked the treasury secretary for a nickel to telephone a friend.
Secretary Mellon said, "Here's a dime. Call both of them."
We’re off to Childs Glacier for a couple of nights and, I assume, out of contact with the world. I'll post one more ahead for tomorrow.
Cordova Fireweed
Just a quickie. The fireweed is in full force in Cordova and attracting all sorts of flying critters. And people seem to attached to it as well as the signs suggest. We're headed out of internet contact - I'm assuming - for a couple of days at Child's Glacier. I'm setting up one or two more posts for while we are gone.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Whittier to Cordova
Looking overboard.
This is a very comfortable way to travel. No pat downs or scanners either.
Almost in Cordova, which is on left (out of the picture.)
We're hoping to enjoy some Alaska time. And visit friends.
What Makes an Empty Lot "Empty"?
We are human beings. We need places to live. We need common buildings for trade and other activities. But we need a sensibility that sees that an empty lot isn't empty. It's full of life and full of natural infrastructure that keeps our air and water clean, and provides habitat for small animals, insects, and the birds that feed on them. And if we look closely, we see universes within universes.
Soon, riding around town, you'll hardly ever be able to see the mountains. As fields get replaced by view blocking buildings.
I only intended to play with the idea of an empty lot, but it seems logical to take it a step further and raise Title 21. You're going to be hearing more and more about Title 21 in the next couple of months. After years of public process in which a new code was hashed out among all interest groups, Mayor Sullivan has asked attorney and former assemblyman Dan Coffey to go through and make title 21 more development friendly. Developers had had years to get their issues raised and much of the ordinance was changed to accommodate their concerns. Then the ordinance was provisionally passed by the Assembly. The provisions were simply to make it consistent and clean up the language.
But Sullivan seems to have hijacked this process and from what I'm told, Coffey has worked with the Building Association to change it even more to their liking. Again, as I said, after all these negotiations and tradeoffs were made in public. Now, they've gotten to work with Coffey out of the public light to make the code developer friendly and help keep Anchorage in the urban design dim ages. It's not a done deal, but if people don't let their assembly members and the planning and zoning board know how they feel, it will be.
Cheryl Richardson has a compass piece on this you might want to check that outlines what has happened. She's been a community activist for years, fighting for public transportation options and good urban planning. She does it because she thinks it's important and doesn't get paid to do this.
Coffey claims the charges are baseless. He's had $40,000 or so contracts from the city to revise the code to the Mayor's liking. He's an attorney who favors the positions his clients want. That's what attorneys do, so that's fine. But as you read the two pieces, consider which account is more likely to be closer to the way things have actually happened.
Monday, July 25, 2011
US House Takes Economy Hostage
As I understand this, Congress has been using its credit card to fund a whole lot of things. Some are required by past agreements - like Social Security and Medicare. Others are discretionary, like sending US soldiers to Iraq and Afghanistan.
And they've spent past their limit. This has happened before and a mechanism has been put in place. Congress simply passes legislation that raises the debt limit. (You'd think the fact that they've passed bills authorizing all the spending would be enough, but when they hit a magic number, the president has to say 'pretty please' to be able to carry out all they've told him to do.)
If they don't do that, the US government's income won't be enough to cover all its debts. The government will have to sort through the bills coming due and decide which ones to pay and which ones to stall or skip altogether. Up until now, the US economy has been the most dependable and investors - individuals, corporations, and governments - have chosen the US economy as a safe place to invest. Because of the US's reliability, they've been able to sell bonds and other financial instruments at relatively low interest rates.
But if the US starts to default on some of its debts, then its credibility will go down. And its credit rating. A slow cascade of collapses is likely to happen. Government contractors who don't get paid, will stop paying their creditors and both will lay off employees. Those employees will spend less money and the places where they normally would spend money will run into trouble. The recession will get worse.
That's the scenario economists of all stripes have been painting. The Republican leadership has even said not raising the debt limit is unthinkable. A Wall Street Journal article said it threatened the US' special standing in the world even.
BUT, there are enough Republicans in the House who have decided that if it is so unthinkable, they can make demands on the President and he'll have no choice but to comply if he wants to raise the debt limit. So, instead of just passing the bill to increase the debt ceiling to equal the budgets they've passed, they've taken this vital piece of legislation hostage and have told the president that if he doesn't meet their demands, the debt ceiling increase is dead.
Sounds like a kidnapper or a hijacker to me.
Essentially, they are saying, if you don't meet our demands, we will let the air out of the American economy. We've got the debt limit increase hostage, and if you don't bow to our demands, we're killing it. We know it won't be pretty, they are saying, but the ends (apparently) justify the means. Yes, we know people will get hurt, but they'll get hurt worse in the long run if we don't reduce the national debt. The President agrees the debt needs to be lowered. But he understands that government spending, during an economic slump, is necessary until the economy revives. And he doesn't want to hurt people already hurting. So he wants to include taxes on the wealthiest Americans as part of the debt lowering strategy.
I've looked up terrorism and there's little agreement on a definition. It seems officials want definitions that paint their enemies as terrorists, but are careful that they won't fall into that category themselves, so they can't agree. While the House Republicans seem to be acting on their conservative ideology (one of the definitions of terrorists) one might argue that they aren't using violence to terrorize the population (another part of the most basic definitions of terrorism.) So, technically, we might not call them terrorists.
But if they cause an economic crisis that worsens the US economy, I'd argue that they will cause far more deaths (because of cutbacks in services at all levels) and damage than the terrorists who took down the World Trade Center. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, for one, is willing to risk the standing of the US economy to get what he wants. Back in April:
It's common for politicians - and all those trying to wield power for whatever goals - to make their demands in the name of the people, rather than to say, it's simply what they themselves want. Cantor calls it a "leverage moment," and from a purely utilitarian perspective, it is. Other leverage moments include when someone has a gun at your head on a dark, empty street. Or when someone's kidnapped your spouse and now demands $200,000 in unmarked bills by Friday or else.
(While there are times when 'leverage points' might reasonably be taken advantage of, one that risks the US economy and the well being of people around the world, is not one of those. However, I would say that the Democrats need a modern day Tip O'Neil to help them work the rules of the House to counter this.)
I just don't see how this is different from blackmail. If you don't do what we want you to do, we're going to inflict severe damage on the economy. These are small minds at work. The way they solve problems is by force, by bullying. By tearing down, not by creating new options to work this out. These guys don't trust anyone who doesn't think like they do. Maybe, because, like most of us, they believe others think like they do, and they think: "Take no prisoners." There's a reason they are called "Young Guns." Subtlety and nuance doesn't seem part of their grey matter.
That's how I see it. Could I be wrong? It's happened before. If we default, will the world sigh a breath of relief knowing the Republicans are finally getting the US finances in order? I wouldn't bet on it.
And they've spent past their limit. This has happened before and a mechanism has been put in place. Congress simply passes legislation that raises the debt limit. (You'd think the fact that they've passed bills authorizing all the spending would be enough, but when they hit a magic number, the president has to say 'pretty please' to be able to carry out all they've told him to do.)
If they don't do that, the US government's income won't be enough to cover all its debts. The government will have to sort through the bills coming due and decide which ones to pay and which ones to stall or skip altogether. Up until now, the US economy has been the most dependable and investors - individuals, corporations, and governments - have chosen the US economy as a safe place to invest. Because of the US's reliability, they've been able to sell bonds and other financial instruments at relatively low interest rates.
But if the US starts to default on some of its debts, then its credibility will go down. And its credit rating. A slow cascade of collapses is likely to happen. Government contractors who don't get paid, will stop paying their creditors and both will lay off employees. Those employees will spend less money and the places where they normally would spend money will run into trouble. The recession will get worse.
That's the scenario economists of all stripes have been painting. The Republican leadership has even said not raising the debt limit is unthinkable. A Wall Street Journal article said it threatened the US' special standing in the world even.
BUT, there are enough Republicans in the House who have decided that if it is so unthinkable, they can make demands on the President and he'll have no choice but to comply if he wants to raise the debt limit. So, instead of just passing the bill to increase the debt ceiling to equal the budgets they've passed, they've taken this vital piece of legislation hostage and have told the president that if he doesn't meet their demands, the debt ceiling increase is dead.
Sounds like a kidnapper or a hijacker to me.
Essentially, they are saying, if you don't meet our demands, we will let the air out of the American economy. We've got the debt limit increase hostage, and if you don't bow to our demands, we're killing it. We know it won't be pretty, they are saying, but the ends (apparently) justify the means. Yes, we know people will get hurt, but they'll get hurt worse in the long run if we don't reduce the national debt. The President agrees the debt needs to be lowered. But he understands that government spending, during an economic slump, is necessary until the economy revives. And he doesn't want to hurt people already hurting. So he wants to include taxes on the wealthiest Americans as part of the debt lowering strategy.
I've looked up terrorism and there's little agreement on a definition. It seems officials want definitions that paint their enemies as terrorists, but are careful that they won't fall into that category themselves, so they can't agree. While the House Republicans seem to be acting on their conservative ideology (one of the definitions of terrorists) one might argue that they aren't using violence to terrorize the population (another part of the most basic definitions of terrorism.) So, technically, we might not call them terrorists.
But if they cause an economic crisis that worsens the US economy, I'd argue that they will cause far more deaths (because of cutbacks in services at all levels) and damage than the terrorists who took down the World Trade Center. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, for one, is willing to risk the standing of the US economy to get what he wants. Back in April:
In exchange for raising the debt limit -- long a routine move allowing the Treasury Department to borrow more money -- House Republicans will demand further concessions to shrink the government, Cantor said."There comes at times leverage moments, a time when the president will capitulate to what the American people want right now," he said. "They don't want to raise taxes, they don't want borrowing to continue out of control."
[I went to the original source - Fox News - but could only find their transcript which was substantially the same, but either they garbled it, or they quoted Cantor verbatim. It seems the Huffington Post (above quote) captures it pretty accurately and more eloquently.]
It's common for politicians - and all those trying to wield power for whatever goals - to make their demands in the name of the people, rather than to say, it's simply what they themselves want. Cantor calls it a "leverage moment," and from a purely utilitarian perspective, it is. Other leverage moments include when someone has a gun at your head on a dark, empty street. Or when someone's kidnapped your spouse and now demands $200,000 in unmarked bills by Friday or else.
(While there are times when 'leverage points' might reasonably be taken advantage of, one that risks the US economy and the well being of people around the world, is not one of those. However, I would say that the Democrats need a modern day Tip O'Neil to help them work the rules of the House to counter this.)
I just don't see how this is different from blackmail. If you don't do what we want you to do, we're going to inflict severe damage on the economy. These are small minds at work. The way they solve problems is by force, by bullying. By tearing down, not by creating new options to work this out. These guys don't trust anyone who doesn't think like they do. Maybe, because, like most of us, they believe others think like they do, and they think: "Take no prisoners." There's a reason they are called "Young Guns." Subtlety and nuance doesn't seem part of their grey matter.
That's how I see it. Could I be wrong? It's happened before. If we default, will the world sigh a breath of relief knowing the Republicans are finally getting the US finances in order? I wouldn't bet on it.
Sunday, July 24, 2011
Moni, Ropi, and Alex - Happy Birthday
This is a great day for a birthday. May the year be interesting, fun, and fulfilling for you all.
Saturday, July 23, 2011
Judge Rules Against Redistricting Board and Keeps Cases in Fairbanks
Chris Eshleman at the Fairbanks News-Miner reports that Judge McConahy ruled the court challenges to the Alaska Redistricting Board's redistricting plan will be heard in Fairbanks in January.
The board's attorney, Michael White, sounded fairly confident at last Monday's meeting that the case would be consolidated (the two Fairbanks challenges and the Petersburg challenge) and was hoping the trial would be in Anchorage. When I talked to him after the meeting Monday he said he was hoping a decision to move to Anchorage would come before the Friday hearing in Fairbanks. In the memo to the board on the lawsuits he concluded with:
Having a Fairbanks jury that understands the neighborhoods involved does mean that the deliberations will be made by well informed jurors which would not be the case in Anchorage. As much as I listened and watched, I simply could not absorb what was said about Fairbanks the way I could about what was said about Anchorage. It's just the way the human brain works.
In fact, only one board member was from Fairbanks (none were from Anchorage).Bill [Jim] Holm is a former Republican legislator who lost his 2006 reelection bid to Democratic representative Scott Kawazaki. For both the draft plan and the final plan, Holm was the one who prepared the Fairbanks plans (outside of the public meeting) which was then presented to the board who made no substantative changes. Already in the draft plan, Holm had cut off the communities of Ester and Goldstream. I already knew that Ester (nicknamed the Ester Republic*) was considered a liberal bastion and from the discussions it sounds like Goldstream may lean left of the rest of Fairbanks too.
In the final plan, Ester and Goldstream were still amputated from the rest of Fairbanks and put into a district (38) that stretches out to the Aleutians, creating a district that combines surban Fairbanks residents who live a short drive from shopping malls and the University of Alaska Fairbanks campus, to Native villages off the road system, like Hooper Bay, where people use 'honey buckets' instead of sewers. Below is a video tape made by local resident Jacqueline Agnew in 2004 and 2005 showing the how they empty the honey buckets and offering a tour of Hooper Bay.
In the video, she discusses a future water and wastewater system, so I checked online to see if it is complete. I found this state budget item. You can see the yourself it's not scheduled for completion until 2016. And this is a only budget request. Let me check if it was funded.
I checked the FY 2011 budget and the only item listed for Hooper Bay was for Boat Harbor and Barge Loading Reconnaissance for $300,000. The FY 2012 budget doesn't seem to have it either. Just more Boat Harbor funding for Hooper Bay. Since I had a video for Hooper Bay, I decided to see what I could find on Ester. This is audio over slides of the Fourth of July parade in 2009.
I believe that we humans have a lot more in common with other human beings who live in different cultures than we generally think. Surely living in a remote Thai province for two years helped me come to this conclusion. And as I look at the videos, while it is clear that residents of Ester and Hooper Bay live in very different worlds and have very different needs from their legislators, they also have some very human similarities. But the state constitution says the districts should be socio-economically integrated and clearly that is not the case here. The question before the court will be whether there was any way to follow the Voting rights Act which requires keeping the nine Native districts without creating a district that is so clearly in violation of the Alaska Constitution. I guess I should also note that while it appears district 38 is the focus of the Fairbanks' challenges there are other issues and, of course, Petersburg's challenge is totally different.
The board's attorney, Michael White, sounded fairly confident at last Monday's meeting that the case would be consolidated (the two Fairbanks challenges and the Petersburg challenge) and was hoping the trial would be in Anchorage. When I talked to him after the meeting Monday he said he was hoping a decision to move to Anchorage would come before the Friday hearing in Fairbanks. In the memo to the board on the lawsuits he concluded with:
We recently filed a Motion to Consolidate and Change Venue of City of Petersburg, et al. v. State of Alaska, Alaska Redistricting Board, to move the case to Anchorage. The Petersburg plaintiffs do not oppose this motion. Plaintiffs in both Fairbanks cases oppose changing venue to Anchorage. The motion also requests the court consolidate the Fairbanks proceedings with the Petersburg case in Anchorage. We asked for expedited consolidation of this motion requesting a decision by Thursday, July 21. [bold emphasis added]But based on the FNM article, the judge is going to hear the case in Fairbanks in January.
A judge said this morning he’ll consolidate challenges to state redistricting plans and plans to hold a January trial in Fairbanks.
Three parties, including the Fairbanks North Star Borough, are suing over the Alaska Redistricting Board’s map of tentative state House and Senate districts.
Superior Court Judge Michael McConahy met today for the first time with attorneys for all three parties. The state, after any appeals to the Alaska Supreme Court, will need final jurisdictional maps in place by early summer to guide residents interested in running for public office.
Having a Fairbanks jury that understands the neighborhoods involved does mean that the deliberations will be made by well informed jurors which would not be the case in Anchorage. As much as I listened and watched, I simply could not absorb what was said about Fairbanks the way I could about what was said about Anchorage. It's just the way the human brain works.
In fact, only one board member was from Fairbanks (none were from Anchorage).
|
In the final plan, Ester and Goldstream were still amputated from the rest of Fairbanks and put into a district (38) that stretches out to the Aleutians, creating a district that combines surban Fairbanks residents who live a short drive from shopping malls and the University of Alaska Fairbanks campus, to Native villages off the road system, like Hooper Bay, where people use 'honey buckets' instead of sewers. Below is a video tape made by local resident Jacqueline Agnew in 2004 and 2005 showing the how they empty the honey buckets and offering a tour of Hooper Bay.
In the video, she discusses a future water and wastewater system, so I checked online to see if it is complete. I found this state budget item. You can see the yourself it's not scheduled for completion until 2016. And this is a only budget request. Let me check if it was funded.
I checked the FY 2011 budget and the only item listed for Hooper Bay was for Boat Harbor and Barge Loading Reconnaissance for $300,000. The FY 2012 budget doesn't seem to have it either. Just more Boat Harbor funding for Hooper Bay. Since I had a video for Hooper Bay, I decided to see what I could find on Ester. This is audio over slides of the Fourth of July parade in 2009.
I believe that we humans have a lot more in common with other human beings who live in different cultures than we generally think. Surely living in a remote Thai province for two years helped me come to this conclusion. And as I look at the videos, while it is clear that residents of Ester and Hooper Bay live in very different worlds and have very different needs from their legislators, they also have some very human similarities. But the state constitution says the districts should be socio-economically integrated and clearly that is not the case here. The question before the court will be whether there was any way to follow the Voting rights Act which requires keeping the nine Native districts without creating a district that is so clearly in violation of the Alaska Constitution. I guess I should also note that while it appears district 38 is the focus of the Fairbanks' challenges there are other issues and, of course, Petersburg's challenge is totally different.
Friday, July 22, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)