Actions Speak Louder Than Words . . .Why I Really Like tick tick BOOM

I had some kitchen tasks to do - preparing some meals, baking a bread - so I asked Netflix for music and they gave me tick tick Boom as the first choice.  I loved it when I first watched it; enough to watch it again.  And so I put it on a third time. It was still good.  Though I'm tempted to blame me not paying enough attention to the bread and screwing it up.    

So let me recommend it here for folks with Netflix.  

It's musical written by Jonathon Larson, about Jonathan Larson writing an earlier musical that never got performed.  It shows the artist with a vision in his head that's keeping him poor because it's taking him years to get it on paper.  He lives in a 5th floor walkup apartment in New York with his long time school friend,  an aspiring actor.  

The movie switches back and forth from Jonathon talking to an audience about the story and the actual events he's telling the audience.  Music is never more than a beat away.

Andrew Garfield is amazing as Larson.  

But more.  Jonathan Larson, if you don't know (I didn't) went on to write Rent next.  So we are essentially seeing the story of his struggle to survive in New York writing his musicals, waiting tables at a diner, until he makes it. All the while he thinks in music and lyrics. 

Inspiring for people who are feeling despair at today's political situation.  

But the music and the story are also captivating.  And the dancing.  

If you need more convincing, the movie was directed by Lin-Manual Miranda, the genius behind Hamilton!  Here's a trailer. 

Here are the lyrics of the song at the end of the trailer.

from:  https://genius.com/Jonathan-larson-why-lyrics

Actions speak louder than

(Louder than, louder than)

Words

What does it take

To wake up a generation?

[ALL]

How can you make someone

Take off and fly?

[JON]

If we don't wake up

And shake up the nation

We'll eat the dust

Of the world wondering why

[JON]

Why do we follow leaders who never lead?

[MICHAEL]

Why does it take catastrophe to start a revolution

[MICHAEL and SUSAN]

If we're so free?

Tell me why

[JON]

Someone tell me why

So many people bleed

[JON] [MICHAEL and SUSAN]

Cages or wings, Cages or wings

Which do you prefer?

Ask the birds Ah:

The Save Act Will Essentially Disenfranchise A Lot Of US Voters

 

One reason I haven't blogged as much as usual:  I'm still having problems loading photos from my to my laptop.  After I chatted with an Apple (allegedly a real person in the Philippines), I got it to work.  But the very next time it didn't again.  Also we were in LA and San Diego for a memorial for a high school friend.  I could have done some quick photo posts, but . . . the airdrop wasn't dropping.  And yes, I could probably load them onto the blog all on the phone, but I haven't tried doing that.  

So Tuesday evening, I brought my Canon camera to the Marston Auditorium to hear about the SAVE Act - presented by the ACLU, the League of Women's Voters, and the Native American Fund.  That camera has an SD card and I have an attachment that lets me plug it into the laptop.

Mara Kimel, from the ACLU introduced the first speaker who had just flown up from LA.  Xavier Presad outlined key problem areas of the Act

What he didn't say, in so many words, but what I took from all the specific issues, was that this is a giant voter suppression act.  Which makes sense coming from this administration and, presumably, the folks at the Heritage Foundation.  They've been worried about the changing US demographics for years. It's why they talk about The Great Replacement Theory. And some folks said 2024 was the last year demographics gave the Republicans a chance to win elections.  Which is why, in part, the president is trying to export a million people.  And import white South Africans.  I'd note that voting by non-citizens is rare, but Republicans seem to want to make people believe it's common, just as they want to make people believe most immigrants are here illegally, are rapits, terrorists, and or murderers.  All to justify flying kidnapped people (citizens and non-citizens) to gulags outside the US.  But this is all my take, not what Xavier said.  

Xavier Presad

Xavier is an ACLU attorney "focused on voting and protecting democracy."  

You can view the SAVE Act here.

Key issues Xavier and the other panelists raised:

1.  People required to prove they are US citizens to register to vote, they'll need:

• birth certificate
• passport

Voters' ids must have names that are the same as the name on their birth certificates, or be able to prove they officially changed their name.  Anyone who has changed their name - adoptees, married women, for example - will need one of the  IDs above to register to vote.  

While Tribal IDs are listed in the ACT, many, if not most, do not include place of birth and a photo. So they won't be valid. 

Real IDs from many states have the same problem.  

A significant number of USians do not have passports and getting a birth certificate takes several weeks at least and costs $15 on up, depending on which state.  So essentially, anyone trying to prove their nationality will have to get started at least a month before an election or they likely won't get their documentation back on time.  

Another section, they said, makes it possible to remove people from the rolls without notification shortly before the election.  So people will show up to vote, thinking they are registered, and won't have any of the documentation of their citizenship.  And won't be able to vote.   See language from the Act below on acceptable ID.  

The panel after Prasad's talk

2.  Registration has to be done in person.  Everyone has to go to an election office to register to vote.  This ends automatic registration for people who get a driver's license and registering online or having people authorized to register people at events or in front of the supermarket.  For Alaska, it ends automatic voter registration when you apply for a Permanent Fund dividend.  This puts a much bigger burden on election offices and on people who do not live near election offices.  Alaska has only 6 Election Offices - Juneau, Anchorage, Fairbanks, Nome, Wasilla, and Kenai, which is a satellite office of the Wasilla office.  This will make it much harder for rural Alaskans, on or off the road system, to register.  Ir would even act like a poll tax for those who have fly to register.  People in Tok would have to drive to Wasilla or Fairbanks.  And they have to be there during office hours, so it could mean taking off work.  

3.  

Panelist Heather Annett, League of Women Voters

Criminalization of poll workers

People who do not appear on the precinct rolls who say they are registered but do not have proper identification (proving they are US citizens), can be given a provisional ballot to vote.  But the SAVE Act makes it possible to criminally prosecute a poll worker and carries up to five years in prison. 

This seems like it's designed to discourage poll workers from giving provisional ballots.  It also seems to be a way to intimidate potential poll workers.  If you look at the list of acceptable ID's how can an election worker be sure they are authentic, or that the state seal is authentic, or that it was filed with the office responsible to for vital statistics?  Finding enough poll workers is already a problem due, in part, to harassment by GOP voters.

4.  Unfunded Mandate.  The Constitution gives the States some control over elections

Panelist Kristen Gerbatsch,
Native American Rights Fund

"Article I  Legislative Branch

Section 4 Congress

Clause 1 Elections Clause

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators."

Congress has the power to make changes.   

But the bill doesn't authorize any funding for the massive changes states will have to make to the ways they register voters, check for proof of citizenship, and training for staff and poll workers on all the new regulations.  I couldn't find a cost estimate, though I believe one of the speakers did give one. 

Panelist Riza Smith, Action Alaska, Vet

5.  Costs for people (especially rural folks) to register.  This was alluded to in the section 2 - in person registration, but needs to be emphasized for Alaskans, many of whom live off the road system.  They will have to fly or take a ship to get to a location that has an election office.  And while some people may visit one of the six towns with an election office during the year, they have to go to the office during regular working hours.  So weekends are out.  For many this will require taking off work.  If they're, say in Anchorage, for medical care, getting to the election office to register could be a real burden.  A large number of the people living off the road system are Alaska Natives.  For example:

Kayak ad for Anchorage to Dutch Harbor flight
$1408 round trip

The SAVE Act passed the House on April 8, 2025.  It goes next to the Senate.   Conservatives have been eroding Voting Rights for a while.  Shelby County v. Holder began a wholesale attack on voting rights.

Appendix 1:  Acceptable ID

From the SAVE Act as of April 10, 2025 after passage in the House:

(1)

A form of identification issued consistent with the requirements of the REAL ID Act of 2005 that indicates the applicant is a citizen of the United States.

(2)

A valid United States passport.

(3)

The applicant's official United States military identification card, together with a United States military record of service showing that the applicant's place of birth was in the United States.

(4)

A valid government-issued photo identification card issued by a Federal, State or Tribal government showing that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States.

(5)

A valid government-issued photo identification card issued by a Federal, State or Tribal government other than an identification described in paragraphs (1) through (4), but only if presented together with one or more of the following:

(A)

A certified birth certificate issued by a State, a unit of local government in a State, or a Tribal government which—

(i)

was issued by the State, unit of local government, or Tribal government in which the applicant was born;

(ii)

was filed with the office responsible for keeping vital records in the State;

(iii)

includes the full name, date of birth, and place of birth of the applicant;

(iv)

lists the full names of one or both of the parents of the applicant;

(v)

has the signature of an individual who is authorized to sign birth certificates on behalf of the State, unit of local government, or Tribal government in which the applicant was born;

(vi)

includes the date that the certificate was filed with the office responsible for keeping vital records in the State; and

(vii)

has the seal of the State, unit of local government, or Tribal government that issued the birth certificate.

(B)

An extract from a United States hospital Record of Birth created at the time of the applicant's birth which indicates that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States.

(C)

A final adoption decree showing the applicant’s name and that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States.

(D)

A Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a citizen of the United States or a certification of the applicant’s Report of Birth of a United States citizen issued by the Secretary of State.

(E)

A Naturalization Certificate or Certificate of Citizenship issued by the Secretary of Homeland Security or any other document or method of proof of United States citizenship issued by the Federal government pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act.

(F)

An American Indian Card issued by the Department of Homeland Security with the classification ‘KIC’.

Appendix 2:  State Requirements in the Act

(3)

State requirements  [this is only partial]

Each State shall take affirmative steps on an ongoing basis to ensure that only United States citizens are registered to vote under the provisions of this Act, which shall include the establishment of a program described in paragraph (4) not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection.

(4)

Program described

A State may meet the requirements of paragraph (3) by establishing a program under which the State identifies individuals who are not United States citizens using information supplied by one or more of the following sources:

(A)

The Department of Homeland Security through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) or otherwise.

(B)

The Social Security Administration through the Social Security Number Verification Service, or otherwise.

(C)

State agencies that supply State identification cards or driver’s licenses where the agency confirms the United States citizenship status of applicants.

(D)

Other sources, including databases, which provide confirmation of United States citizenship status.

I'd note, that the Privacy Act of 1974 requires all agencies that collect personal information from citizens and non-citizens to state on the document how that information will be used.  The agencies are not allowed to share that information with anyone or any agency not listed.  This would be a complete violation of the Privacy Act.  

The Save Act has not been passed by the US Senate. It appears that it will face obstacles in the Senate.  But the more people express their opposition the easier it will be for GOP senators to oppose the bill.  You can contact your US Senators here.

The Blind Men And The Elephant - And the House Rules Committee's Live 1 am Hearing

 I'm listening to the live House Rules Committee hearing on the "The One Big Beautiful Bill" (as the Republicans call it) at 10:30 pm Alaska time.  That makes it 2:30am in Washington DC.  As Democratic and Republican House members take turns;  It's as though the Democrats and the Republicans are talking about completely different bills. 

It made me think of the story of the blind men and the elephant.  

“Hey, the elephant is a pillar,” said the first man who touched his leg.

“Oh, no! it is like a rope,” said the second man who touched the tail.

“Oh, no! it is like a thick branch of a tree,” said the third man who touched the trunk of the elephant.

“It is like a big hand fan” said the fourth man who touched the ear of the elephant.

“It is like a huge wall,” said the fifth man who touched the belly of the elephant.

“It is like a solid pipe,” Said the sixth man who touched the tusk of the elephant.

They began to argue about the elephant and everyone of them insisted that he was right. It looked

like they were getting agitated. A wise man was passing by and he saw this. He stopped and asked them, “What is the matter?” They said, “We cannot agree to what the elephant is like.” Each one of them told what he thought the elephant was like. The wise man calmly explained to them, “All of you are right. The reason every one of you is telling it differently because each one of you touched a different part of the elephant. So, actually the elephant has all those features what you all said.”

From Medium

Giving the best interpretation, the Republicans and the Democrats, are talking about different parts of the bill.  One Republican said something like, "The Democrats don't want to support police and fire fighters.."  I don't know what those parts of the bill actually say, but if those aren't the parts the Democrats are complaining about.  

The Democrats are saying the bill:

1.  Destroys medicaid

2.  Gets rid of food assistance for children   5 million more hungry Americans

3.   So people making over $3 million a year will get hundreds of thousands of dollar cuts in their taxes.

But I'm not sure that conclusion in the blind men story is accurate when it says that everyone is right because everyone is describing a different part of the elephant.  

I'm inclined to believe that Democrats are doing a more accurate job of describing this bill.  Why?  Because this is Trump's bill and Trump lies more than all the previous presidents combined.  In just one day.  We also know that Trump has pushed hard on Republicans to vote for his bills and to support them.   But I know that die-hard Republicans would reject my interpretation.  We truly are living in completely different realities.  For instance, the Republicans are focused on the fact that Federal employees get a better pensions than private employees.  They don't mention that private employees tend to get paid more.  And even more importantly, that private companies have been cutting retirement benefits for their employees.  And they are succeeding in that because Congressional Republicans have weakened unions for 50 years.  And finally, Federal retirement systems should be the aspiration of private sector employees, and that may be one of the reasons private sector employers do not like Federal retirement systems.  

I also believe this because I was just at a public meeting hosted by the League of Women's Voters and the ACLU and the Native American Rights Fund, discussing the Save Act.  This Act being pushed by Republicans is essentially a voter suppression bill.  I'll get to that in the next post.  

And Democrats are citing Conservative think tanks like the Manhattan Institute and Moody's lower the US credit rating, that the bill will raise the debt significantly.  And they are quoting Republican Senators who say it will blow up the deficit.  

For those of you reading from other parts of the world, you can listen in if you find this right away.  I don't know if YouTube will leave this hearing up after it's over.  If so, you can listen in and evaluate my perception.  

The Rest Of The May Day Anchorage Protest Photos

I  got help from Apple today to fix my problem with AirDropping the pictures on my phone to my laptop.  We did it through Chat.  They denied being AI and wrote they were in the Philippines.  The fix was to go into my phone settings, down to 'transfer or reset phone' and then 'reset'.  I was nervous that I'd lose a bunch of things, but so far it seems ok.  And when I tried to upload the photos it worked.  

So here are more of the photos from the May 1 protest in Anchorage.  The original post is here.

Anchorage Comes Out For May Day Protest (Photos Added)

 The May Day protests in Anchorage were organized by local unions.  It was hard to judge the size - we were on a flat area and I could get a position that let me look over the crowd.  You could see the people around you but it was hard to tell how far back they went.  Walking around I saw lots and lots of people and lots and lots of signs.   I'd say at least 2000, probably a lot more. Close to 1% of the Anchorage population.  Considering this is the third major rally in a month or so, it was a big crowd.  It was also a Thursday afternoon, temperature in the high 40s F, threatening to rain (which it starting doing just after most people had left.)  

Unlike the previous one I went to, this one was more than just a mass of people.  There were booths of organizations involved in setting this up - various unions, particularly NEA and AFL-CIO.  

You could get information about volunteering, about services offered, how to sign up for emails about future rallies.  

A key group - along with the unions - was Stand Up Alaska.  

One thing I've been thinking about is how these various organizations are coordinating with each other, how they are dividing tasks, how they are contacting the public, and what they are doing beyond having big rallies.  

How are they letting people know what kind of action they can take?  How do they determine what's most effective?

Are they tracking the kinds of questions people are asking?

My sense is that if things are going to change, the huge block of people who simply did not vote, needs to be mobilized.  

As I look at these pictures, I see they're kind of dark and not terribly sharp.  These are the ones I took with my telephoto lens.  My phone pictures are still on my phone as the AirDrop is being balky again after a couple of weeks of quick and easy AirDrops.  

Just trying to get this up.  Trying to do too much has kept a number of posts from not making it at all.  

Went trouble shooting and found that my MacBook Air Drop was set to "receiving off."  Changed that to every ten minutes (not sure what that means in this case) and suddenly AirDrop worked like a charm.

ADDED  So here are pics I took with the phone.  

The Doormat Dan signs - referring to US Senator Dan Sullivan have been around and are professionally printed.  But this display of the sign is someone's personal project.  

I tried the Air Drop with just three pics and it worked.  But then when I went to add the rest, the old problem came back.  Airdrop failed.  

I have to figure this out.  

UPDATE May 6, 2025:  I got Apple Support to help.  I've uploaded a few more pictures in a new post.