I wrote a post about the protests against the Supreme Court decision on abortion. In it, I mentioned how, during the Vietnam war era, everyone was affected by the draft; men who were subject to the draft and the women who were connected to them. And that led to a lot more anti-war activism than any war since the draft was ended. I said I thought the abortion decision would have the same effect on activism now.
I got this comment:
'During the 1960's the protesting against the Vietnam war was invigorated by the fact that all 18 year old men had to register for the draft and stood a decent chance of being sent to Vietnam to fight. '
Not true Steve, I graduated HS in 1969 in June. July I got the notice that I was 1-A and August I was called for my physical. This is while most of my friends who were going to college got a student deferment. The decent chance came after the draft lottery in 1969 when everyone one was treated equal and the privileged class was treated like everyone else. You get a student deferment?
I thought that 'privileged class' seemed like a pretty broad brush to paint all college students and explained in a follow up comment that while I acknowledged that as a white US citizen I clearly had privilege over people of color, but not over other white men subject to the draft. I explained my family background - that my parents had gotten to the US with very little and both worked full time. I also acknowledged that you might say I was privileged to live in California in the 60s when college was readily available to most anyone who really wanted to go and that it was cheap. Cheap enough for me to pay my room and board by working 15 hours a week. I asked what it was that privileged me that Anon didn't have.
His short answer was:
"Your privilege was not being 1-A like people who could not get a deferment."
I asked for his definition of privilege and what I had that let me get into college that he didn't have, given that his friends went to college. His response:
'What privilege did I have that got me the deferment that you didn't have?'
My argument is that you got a four years get out of jail free card because you went to school. Tell me why studying English Literature gets you out of the draft for four years and working in a sewing machine factory does not?
I wrote one more response trying to get him to clarify what class advantage I had that he didn't have. When I finished, and hit 'publish' Blogger comments said it was too long.
So I'm creating a whole new post. I think the concept of privilege is important to think about in the US. White Privilege was first outlined, to my understanding, by Peggy McIntosh, as a way of showing the differences that disadvantage black US citizens. Again, if you want to see the original post and the complete comments, go to this link. There are, of course, other forms of more exclusive privilege - particularly great family wealth, fame, etc.
But in recent years people have been throwing the term around pretty loosely - basically to mean, you have something I don't have. It's a Right Wing slur to go along with "elite," to attack people who believe in education and science as important pillars of democracy and civilization.
I'd also note that I suspect the commenter is someone who has commented many times before under the name of Oliver. The writing style, the tendency to not respond to the specific points I raise, the seeming resentment of higher education suggest that. I suspect Anon really believes there is something privileged about going to college, but I'm not sure why and he doesn't seem to want or be able to explain it.
I'd also note, in previous exchanges (not based on this recent post) I've noted that I believe that academic education is probably not the best choice for all, that technical and other kinds of training should be available to lead everyone to gainful, respectable employment. But that such training should include ethics and civic duties of all US citizens. I would add now that given our economy no longer seems to require everyone to work, we need to accommodate how we allow those who are put out of work due to automation and artificial intelligence to still live respectable and decent lives. One option that has been proposed is Universal Basic Income. The field of economics needs badly to rethink how a post - modern economy can and should think about and work including the moral judgments attached to it. .
The Comment That Was Too Long So It Ends Up With Its Own Post
Since you aren’t going to explain your definition of privilege, let me try to explain what I think it is and why I think it’s not the right word here. From Dictionary.com:"1. a special advantage or immunity or benefit not enjoyed by all2. a right reserved exclusively by a particular person or group (especially a hereditary or official right)"
“Privilege comes from Latin privilegium, meaning a law for just one person, and means a benefit enjoyed by an individual or group beyond what's available to others.”
I never said I was drafted, I was 1A, I got called for my physical and did it, and called again for another one for to lock in my classification as 1-A If I remember correctly the lottery came (where everyone had a equal chance) and I ended up getting a high number and went and got a job.
ReplyDeleteLets lose the whataboutism. ‘the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation or raising a different issue.’
What about my parents, what about factory workers, what about hardship deferments, what about handicapped people, what about females (females did serve Steve), what about your resentment, what about right wing slurs, what about your writing style.
Its hard to respond to someone going in 37 directions.
I did not go because I did not have the money and the community college movement was just starting and that’s where I went when I had a chance. And most states did not have the generous tuition benefits as California and student loans were not what they are now.
Were college students a special class when it came to the draft. Yes. Was it reserved exclusively for a certain group? Again yes. It fits your definition of privilege to a T. I guess it’s not a privilege you had just a higher IQ that allowed you to get into college and I would guess pass an entrance exam. Do you think students with low IQ’s should not receive a deferment? Being smarter than the next guy got you into college do you think you deserve a deferment for that?. Everyone did not go to college back in the day.
We had three tracks in high school, academic to prepare you to go to college the students were taking Chemistry and Physics. Vocational where you learn a trade, electronics, computers ect. And general where you took music application and a course called bonehead math where I ended up. From 10-12th grade when I was in high school the 5 students from my school who were killed in Vietnam all took the general path.
According to Appy, "2.5 million young American enlisted men" served in Vietnam, and "[r]oughly 80 percent came from working-class and poor backgrounds." It is Appy's view that "[c]lass, not geography, was the crucial factor in determining which Americans fought in Vietnam."’
Finally, you agree with what I said in my first response to your first comment. Here, you say, “I did not go [to college] because I did not have the money and the community college movement was just starting and that’s where I went when I had a chance. And most states did not have the generous tuition benefits as California and student loans were not what they are now. “
DeleteAnd then you write: “I guess it’s not a privilege you had just a higher IQ that allowed you to get into college and I would guess pass an entrance exam.”
So you are now saying that my privilege was living in California when tuition there was cheap and, being smart enough to get into college.
Here’s what I wrote in the first comment. “My privilege, if that’s what you want to call it, was living in California when tuition was really cheap. I also had enough smarts to get into UCLA.”
I acknowledged that right up front. You could have just said: Yes, living in California and being smart enough to get into college were your two privileges.
I acknowledged precisely that. I just didn’t understand why you thought these were ‘privileges’ and so I asked you to define privilege.
I listed other groups of people who were not drafted to see if you considered them privileged or not. Just because I use the term “what about” doesn’t mean I’m practicing “whataboutism.” The key to the definition is the end of the sentence you quote: “by making a counteraccusation or raising a different issue.’”
I wasn’t accusing them of privilege. I was asking you: are any of these others, who were also exempted, also privileged? I wasn’t changing the subject - the subject was privilege and what it meant specifically related to the draft. I wasn’t denying privilege - I acknowledged from the beginning the two things you now identify as my privilege.
I assume that you are excluding yourself from being privileged because you were exempted by luck - the lottery. Isn’t being born smart or living in California a form of lottery as well? Babies don’t pick their parents or their genes or where they will grow up. It’s luck. Like getting a high lottery number. If you don’t agree, why not? I could make some decent arguments why it is different, but I’m trying to understand why you focused on college. Only because I went to college? If I were a woman would you have focused on that being privileged? Or if I had a physical disability, would that have been the privilege? (No these aren't rhetorical questions, I'd like to know: yes or no?)
I’m sure you think I’m making this more complicated than it is. If I could do it simpler I would. I would counter argue that you are making it simpler than it is.
Handicapped people, especially those with low IQs were not privileged during the draft process. I graduated in 1971, had a ohysicl and was deferred because of poor hearing. But, hundreds of thousands of others with handicaps weren't fortunate, like me.
ReplyDeletehttps://taskandpurpose.com/history/project-100000-vietnam/
Thanks for that link. I wasn't aware of how mentally disabled me were treated by the draft. I was specifically thinking about physically disabled men. I looked back to see what I wrote and I do specify physically disabled in the main post and the comment.
DeleteYea you did specify physical disabilities. My bad.
DeleteWasn;'t sure how to contact you, but, I thought this might be of interest....
ReplyDeleteA Denver city councilmember who supports defunding police weighs new success of replacing cops with mental health teams. Six months in, the team has responded to almost 750 calls, without one arrest.
That six-month experiment has now been dubbed a success, and city leaders are poised to expand it in a big way with an infusion of tax money. Some advocates say spending on police alternatives needs to include a reduction in police funding overall.
https://www.npr.org/2021/03/08/974941422/6-month-experiment-replacing-denver-police-with-mental-health-teams-dubbed-a-suc
Thanks, this seems obvious to me but the 'copaganda' squads keep pushing the idea of high crime and the need for more cops. BTW, email is in right column, just above Blog Archive.
ReplyDeleteThanks for all you do, Sir.
ReplyDelete