So much . . .
Weekly trips to pick up our CSA (Community Supported Agriculture) [It's a USDA website so go quick before the regime either takes it down because it's too 'woke' or it crashes from neglect or incompetence.]


![]() |
From Animalspot.net |
So much . . .
Weekly trips to pick up our CSA (Community Supported Agriculture) [It's a USDA website so go quick before the regime either takes it down because it's too 'woke' or it crashes from neglect or incompetence.]
![]() |
From Animalspot.net |
One reason I haven't blogged as much as usual: I'm still having problems loading photos from my to my laptop. After I chatted with an Apple (allegedly a real person in the Philippines), I got it to work. But the very next time it didn't again. Also we were in LA and San Diego for a memorial for a high school friend. I could have done some quick photo posts, but . . . the airdrop wasn't dropping. And yes, I could probably load them onto the blog all on the phone, but I haven't tried doing that.
So Tuesday evening, I brought my Canon camera to the Marston Auditorium to hear about the SAVE Act - presented by the ACLU, the League of Women's Voters, and the Native American Fund. That camera has an SD card and I have an attachment that lets me plug it into the laptop.
What he didn't say, in so many words, but what I took from all the specific issues, was that this is a giant voter suppression act. Which makes sense coming from this administration and, presumably, the folks at the Heritage Foundation. They've been worried about the changing US demographics for years. It's why they talk about The Great Replacement Theory. And some folks said 2024 was the last year demographics gave the Republicans a chance to win elections. Which is why, in part, the president is trying to export a million people. And import white South Africans. I'd note that voting by non-citizens is rare, but Republicans seem to want to make people believe it's common, just as they want to make people believe most immigrants are here illegally, are rapits, terrorists, and or murderers. All to justify flying kidnapped people (citizens and non-citizens) to gulags outside the US. But this is all my take, not what Xavier said.
![]() |
Xavier Presad |
![]() |
The panel after Prasad's talk |
![]() |
Panelist Kristen Gerbatsch, Native American Rights Fund |
Section 4 CongressClause 1 Elections ClauseThe Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators."
Congress has the power to make changes.
But the bill doesn't authorize any funding for the massive changes states will have to make to the ways they register voters, check for proof of citizenship, and training for staff and poll workers on all the new regulations. I couldn't find a cost estimate, though I believe one of the speakers did give one.
![]() |
Panelist Riza Smith, Action Alaska, Vet |
![]() |
Kayak ad for Anchorage to Dutch Harbor flight $1408 round trip |
From the SAVE Act as of April 10, 2025 after passage in the House:(1) A form of identification issued consistent with the requirements of the REAL ID Act of 2005 that indicates the applicant is a citizen of the United States.
(2) A valid United States passport.
(3) The applicant's official United States military identification card, together with a United States military record of service showing that the applicant's place of birth was in the United States.
(4) A valid government-issued photo identification card issued by a Federal, State or Tribal government showing that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States.
(5) A valid government-issued photo identification card issued by a Federal, State or Tribal government other than an identification described in paragraphs (1) through (4), but only if presented together with one or more of the following:
(A) A certified birth certificate issued by a State, a unit of local government in a State, or a Tribal government which—
(i) was issued by the State, unit of local government, or Tribal government in which the applicant was born;
(ii) was filed with the office responsible for keeping vital records in the State;
(iii) includes the full name, date of birth, and place of birth of the applicant;
(iv) lists the full names of one or both of the parents of the applicant;
(v) has the signature of an individual who is authorized to sign birth certificates on behalf of the State, unit of local government, or Tribal government in which the applicant was born;
(vi) includes the date that the certificate was filed with the office responsible for keeping vital records in the State; and
(vii) has the seal of the State, unit of local government, or Tribal government that issued the birth certificate.
(B) An extract from a United States hospital Record of Birth created at the time of the applicant's birth which indicates that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States.
(C) A final adoption decree showing the applicant’s name and that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States.
(D) A Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a citizen of the United States or a certification of the applicant’s Report of Birth of a United States citizen issued by the Secretary of State.
(E) A Naturalization Certificate or Certificate of Citizenship issued by the Secretary of Homeland Security or any other document or method of proof of United States citizenship issued by the Federal government pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act.
(F) An American Indian Card issued by the Department of Homeland Security with the classification ‘KIC’.
State requirements [this is only partial]
Each State shall take affirmative steps on an ongoing basis to ensure that only United States citizens are registered to vote under the provisions of this Act, which shall include the establishment of a program described in paragraph (4) not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection.
Program described
A State may meet the requirements of paragraph (3) by establishing a program under which the State identifies individuals who are not United States citizens using information supplied by one or more of the following sources:
The Department of Homeland Security through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE
) or otherwise.
The Social Security Administration through the Social Security Number Verification Service, or otherwise.
State agencies that supply State identification cards or driver’s licenses where the agency confirms the United States citizenship status of applicants.
Other sources, including databases, which provide confirmation of United States citizenship status.
I got help from Apple today to fix my problem with AirDropping the pictures on my phone to my laptop. We did it through Chat. They denied being AI and wrote they were in the Philippines. The fix was to go into my phone settings, down to 'transfer or reset phone' and then 'reset'. I was nervous that I'd lose a bunch of things, but so far it seems ok. And when I tried to upload the photos it worked.
So here are more of the photos from the May 1 protest in Anchorage. The original post is here.
[Guide to this post: This post reminds me of the rambling posts I used to do regularly. And it feels good, because the world is tangled up in complicated ways - there are few straight lines. This began as a post about the movie Sinners. But immediately got hijacked by some observations about movie theaters these days. There's a nod to Clarksdale, Mississippi. But then I switch quickly to what I think is a much more important movie - The Laundromat. But that too gets delayed as I talk about Lisa Murkowski's appearance today on Talk of Alaska and her interpretation of her recent "We're all afraid" comment. Which requires some background into what ecumenical means.
If you only want to read one part of this post, I recommend learning about The Laundromat. It's still available on Netflix if you have that. Skip down to that heading - bold and in capitals. Then skip past the part on Murkowski to learn about why I think the film is important.]
We haven't been out to see a movie very often lately. A couple of times while we were in Bainbridge - A Complete Unknown and The Brutalist. Two movies worth seeing.
I'd been hearing about Sinners on Spoutible and BlueSky. Not a lot, but that it was a sleeper big hit, it was a Black themed film. The parts that had me a bit skeptical mentioned horror elements.
Well Monday night is a discount night, as two seniors, we got in for a total of $14!! The tariffs haven't hit Anchorage theaters yet. But our choice of seats was front row or two separate single seats further back. We chose the later. Inside, it was actually pretty empty and we took one of our seats and I sat in the one next to it, my actual seat in the row ahead.
It did fill up a bit more, but no one claimed my seat.
When I say it was full, I probably have to remind folks that the theaters have all been remodeled. There are far fewer total seats, and the ones you get are lounge seats where the head tilts back and the feet up. So a full theater has a lot fewer viewers than in the past.
Later: I didn't finish this. Sinners is a forgettable movie. Except for the music. I don't know what the creators were thinking. We'll do some Black history, but that doesn't sell enough (a dubious premise) so we'll add some great blues music, and to catch today's audience, we'll add in a vampire massacre. And we'll locate it in Clarksdale, Mississippi - the Birthplace of the Blues. (We actually visited Clarksdale and the Blues Museum. Visiting Mississippi was sort of like visiting Albania or North Korea in my mind - a place forbidden and evil. It wasn't our destination, but it was between Chicago and New Orleans by car. But that's a story for another day.)
This feels like one of my old blogposts, that wandered and jumped, as life does and as thoughts do. So let's jump back into the present future.
Why do people say the Democratic party is not really any different from the Republican party? Because deep down, they are both corrupted by money and protection of the wealthy. The Republicans are a lot more open about that. They think rich people are the product of hard work and deserve all they get.
The Democrats are a little embarrassed by their dependence on the rich. They cover this addiction (well it's almost required if you want to have enough money to campaign, thanks to Citizens United) by trying to make the lives of those screwed over by the system a little more bearable. They try to spread a bit of equality to more people, but their hands are just as dirty with money, and they go to parties with lots of people whose wealth comes from less than pristine morals and behavior.
NO, NO, NO, I'm not saying they are the parties are the same, or that life under a Harris administration would have been no different from the disaster of the current Republican Administration. [Someone suggested online today, not to mention his name, but to say Republican Administration instead to make sure all the cowards in the House and Senate are fully implicated in what's going on. After all, they could end this non-violent coups if they chose to. What do you think?)
THE LAUNDROMAT
So, tonight after falling asleep listening to Lisa Murkowski on Talk of Alaska, in what seemed an attempt to clean up her confession to being afraid, that 'We are all afraid' by saying, "It was kind of an ecumenical 'we' . . . When I say Lisa Murkowski is afraid, it's not in a cowardly way." She's not, afraid of things like being primaried, she said. She's hearing from Alaskans who are losing their jobs, from Alaskans whose grant monies and contracts have been halted. "So when I say 'we' I have to include myself as an Alaskan. She also spoke of her oath to uphold the Constitution and her responsibilities under Article 1. "I'm seeing an erosion of the boundaries, if you will, between the Executive and the Legislative branch..." As I say I fell asleep during this and I'm resurrecting her words through the podcast up at Talk of Alaska. (The comments I'm referring to start around 6 minutes in.) And if you are a little confused by her reference to the 'ecumenical we' as I was, here's a little refresher. Maybe she didn't want to say the 'royal we' and 'ecumenical' was the only other 'we' she could think of. Maybe she thought it would imply some sort of bi-partisan message. Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, atheists and agnostics, not included I guess.
"The Ecumenical Movement is a key effort in the Christian faith. It works to bring different Christian groups around the world together. Its importance is seen in religious fellowship and the chase of shared goals. The word ‘ecumenical’ comes from ‘oikoumen?,’ the Greek word for “the inhabited world.” Over time, it has gained a special theological meaning. The word’s evolution shows a move from ordinary to sacred, going from a word about geography to a sign of hope to unite Christians.
"The Ecumenical Movement started as an answer to the need for unity in the Christian church. The church was split by arguments over belief and competitive missions. Through history, ecumenical councils played key roles. They helped form the faith’s theology and practices. This includes councils from the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church. These meetings show the ongoing effort to find what the Ecumenical Movement is today. This effort is helped by groups like the World Council of Churches and places like Taizé that focus on community spirituality." (From Faithonview.com)
But all th's Murkowski stuff slipped in because I got a bit of a nap this evening so I felt like I could partake in a bit of Netflix and while randomly exploring, found a movie called The Laundromat. It turns out I saw this already on Netflix.
It's an important film for USians to watch to understand why some people say there is no difference between the two political parties. The very rich invite politicians of both parties to their parties, and most politicians accept the invitations. (OK, I'm just saying that. I don't have statistics. But I'm pretty sure it's true in a general sort of way.)
It's not your run of the mill movie. It's a semi-fictional account of a woman whose husband dies in a freak boating accident and she learns that the boating company's insurance isn't going to pay. She is told about shell companies and holding companies and off shore accounts. We also meet a couple of wealthy men, business partners, Jürgen Mossack and Ramón Fonseca who tell us their side of the story.
Mossack and Fonseca. Is that ringing any bells? Remember the Panama Papers? When a law firm in Panama got hacked and all their clients and shell companies got exposed? That was Mossack and Fonseca.
It's essentially a movie that attempts to tell us in a down-to-earth way about how the world is rigged against most people by the very wealthy. Generally we just hear stuff that says we're screwed.
" 735 U.S. billionaires hold more wealth ($0.4 trillion more) than the bottom 50% of American households." (I picked this claim because this is from Snopes checking out a statement by Robert Reich, so it was fact checked somewhat.)
The movie tells us a little bit more about how it happens.
Wikipedia says the movie got mixed reviews. But I'm guessing because it's imaginative, clever, and takes a very dry and difficult subject and makes it relatable to the average person. And the only vampires are allegorical blood suckers.
Steven Soderbergh (a very inventive filmmaker) directed it and it stars Meryl Streep as an ordinary USian who wants to know who is screwing her over. Gary Oldman and Antonio Banderas play the two Panama lawyers who got hacked.
As Trump is leaning on Congress to pass a huge tax cut for the very rich, this film does give us a glimpse of how slimy it all is.
>
That wasn't the original title, but as I started writing, it just seemed more apt.
This post is about two videos - one by Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut who lays out the details of the unprecedented level of corruption in the first six weeks of the Trump administration. (Thus the title of this post.)
The second is a woman from Oklahoma venting her anger over the botched Signal chat that put her husband (stationed in the Middle East) in potential danger.
I was struck by the contrast between these two approaches to criticizing the Trump administration - one highly factual and rational, almost like a college lecture. The other focused, but almost unhinged in the level of anger and invective.
I'd argue that we should all be at the level of anger and resistance that woman is at. We shouldn't wait until we are directly impacted. 100,000 people raging like she does would probably pry enough US Senators away from Trump to stop the venal actions that Senator Murphy describes in detail.
We need the facts and details to understand how we're being screwed to raise our level of anger and resistance. And we need her passion and fury to get us to stop pretending life will not be completely disrupted if we don't stop this horror right now.
Murphy Video
There's a lot of content and detail here. You can skip down to the video, or you can first look at my outline of the ways Murphy lists that Trump is corrupting government and enriching himself and his oligarch supporters - from streamlining the art of the bribe to dismantling agencies that have investigations that hurt Trump supporters. Here are some of them, to help you keep track. I've added links if you want to find out more about each.
1. Memecoins - He starts out talking about Trump meme coins that can be used to transfer money, unreported, directly into Trump's account. This is the latest in bribe technology.
What are Meme Coins? |
---|
I had to look up meme coins to try to understand what they are. Here's a link to investopedia.com and one to wikipedia to help you understand. The first link even offers ways to invest. The Wikipedia link is more contextual and historical. One thing I learned looking this up is that DOGE - the Department Of Government Efficiency - the rogue mob that Elon Musk is leading, is also the name of one of the more popular memecoins, one that Musk promoted. |
2. Pays off Oil/Gas Industry's $1 billion bribe. On day one Trump privileges oil and gas and hurts their competition- wind, solar etc. This article documents the billion dollar ask, but the actual money count doesn't get that high. But the benefits were given.
3. Jan 25 Fires the watch dogs - all the Inspectors General - the people who investigate corruption
4. Jan 27 - Fires head of National Labor Relations Board. This means NLRB cannot investigate cases. Musk has lots of cases before the NLRB. And many others around Trump have cases pending.
5. Jan 30 - awards $800K stock of Trump Media platform to cabinet members, which Murphy says is another way for people to move cash to bank accounts of cabinet members in order to get favors.
6. Feb 23 - Weaponization of DOJ - Drops case against Musk SpaceX Then drops case against a GOP congressman. Then Operation Whirlwind that targets anyone critical of Musk or DOGE. DOJ turned into entity that drops cases of Trump loyalists and attacks those who criticize Trump.
7. Feb 1 - Shut down Consumer Finance Protection Board which was investigating Musk and Trump backers - consumer protection actions now gone
8. Feb 4. Meetings in White House with Business Partners - Saudi Gulf League and PGA - Saudis play torunaments at Trump golf course
9. Feb 6 - Pam Bondi - dulls foreign government agent act - No longer registering as foreign government represenatives = now his friends can lobby government while secretly getting paid by foreign governments.
10. Feb 10 - Eric Adams case dropped and publicly announced that gettting rid of the charges against Adams if he pledges loyalty to Trump.Six people in DOJ refused and resigned and finally the seventh agreed.
11. Buying $400 million Tesla’s. Biden admin was going to buy $483K, Trump bumps it up to $400 million. This seems to have been scuttled.
This is only a partial list. The rest are in the video.
The Murphy Video
The second video is just sheer anger at Trump's inept appointees jeopardizing the life of the lady's husband as well as of those of his fellow Middle East stationed military men. [This is supposed to end after about 4 minutes 30 seconds - I added instructions into the code. But it didn't work. I'm not recommending you watch the whole thing.]
The original video I saw, but couldn't find a way to embed, was sharply directed to Sen. Lankford of Oklahoma. She vows to end his career. Very powerful messaging. You can see it at this link to a Bluesky post.
As I said above, we should all be at the level of anger and resistance that woman is at. We shouldn't wait until we are directly impacted. Murphy offers us just a few of the reasons we should be angry as hell. 100,000 people raging like the woman in the video does would probably cause enough GOP Senators and Members of Congress away from Trump to stop the horrors that Senator Murphy describes in detail.
How Do I Love Thee? (Sonnet 43)
Elizabeth Barrett Browning 1806 – 1861
How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.
I love thee to the depth and breadth and height
My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight
For the ends of being and ideal grace.
I love thee to the level of every day’s
Most quiet need, by sun and candle-light.
I love thee freely, as men strive for right.
I love thee purely, as they turn from praise.
I love thee with the passion put to use
In my old griefs, and with my childhood’s faith.
I love thee with a love I seemed to lose
With my lost saints. I love thee with the breath,
Smiles, tears, of all my life; and, if God choose,
I shall but love thee better after death.
This poem is in the public domain.
Intro: Civil Service and Merit System are terms most Americans have heard, but I'd guess that few could tell you, very accurately, what they mean or anything about their history or why they are important bedrocks of American democracy.
Part I - is a repeat of a post I put up last August 31, 2025. Part II will be another old post. It gets into more detail and is based on testimony I gave in a discrimination case years ago. Although there will be repetition, I'm sure that will be helpful for readers to grasp the concepts.
This topic is critical to understanding why what is happening right now is both illegal and will lead to serious damage to the U.S. government's ability to efficiently and effectively serve the people of the United States.
*ET - my conflation of Elon and Trump, though someone else thought it meant Evil Tyrant. Evil Twins might also work. Maybe Elon and Trump can journey to Mars and it can then have its original meaning of Extra Terrestrial.
From the August 31, 2024 post:
From the August 31, 2024 LA Times: [Note the digital and facsimile editions have different titles.]
As someone who taught public administration at the graduate level, I'm well aware of the lack of knowledge of what 'the civil service' is. So let me give you some background.
Before the civil service was created in local, state, and federal governments, we had what is often called "the spoils system."
Briefly, 'to the victor, go the spoils.' Winning candidates gave jobs to the campaign supporters. This was the payoff for working on a campaign. Qualifications were not nearly as important as loyalty. This included positions as low as garbage collector and as high as the head of the budget.
Aside from the incompetence and corruption this led to, it also meant that whenever someone from a different party won, the whole government was thrown out and new people were put in place. And had to learn from scratch, generally without any help from the fired former workers.
Political machines, like Tammany Hall in New York, would recruit new immigrants coming off the ships to work on their campaigns with the promise of a job if they won. [US citizenship was not required to vote back then. That changed later. The Constitution gave the states the power to run elections and decide qualifications to vote. The Constitution didn't ban women from voting, the states did.]
At the national level, this came to a head when Andrew Jackson was elected president and invited 'the riffraff' that elected him to the White House in 1830. But it wasn't until a disgruntled office seeker assassinated President Garfield in 1881 because he didn't get the position he sought, that Congress got serious.
In 1883 they passed the Pendleton Act that set up a civil service system based on merit.
Merit, as in the 'merit system' means that positions are filled based on merit, or on one's qualifications for the job, not on who you know.
Local governments in New York and Boston didn't move to merit systems until the early 20th Century.
Those merit systems weren't perfect. The inherent biases of the day meant that women and Blacks weren't qualified except for what Trump would call 'women's jobs' and 'Black jobs.'
And even today, the top level jobs in most governments are still filled with people who are loyal to the head of the government - whether that's a mayor, governor, or president. Not only does that include cabinet officials but a top layer of 'exempt' positions. Exempt meaning they are not covered by the merit system. They can be hired and fired at will. Usually the newly elected official picks people based on their loyalty to the policy as well as their professional qualifications to do the job. But clearly that second part doesn't always happen. The only check on this, is a required vote of approval by a legislative body - the US or state Senate, a City Council. But if the newly elected executive has a majority in the legislative branch too, that approval is often pro forma.
People hired through a merit system process also have job protections. They cannot be fired except for cause - for violating the law, the policies or procedures, for gross incompetence etc. Whereas the appointed (exempt) positions don't have such protections.
After his 2016 election, Trump was frequently frustrated by career civil servants, who didn't jump to follow his often illegal instructions. The media have dubbed these people (who included many appointed positions as well) 'the guardrails' that kept Trump somewhat in line. He wanted the Justice Department to punish people who opposed him. He did battle with the civil servants in various regulatory agencies who followed the law rather than Trump's illegal bidding.
So, when we hear that Trump wants to destroy the civil service, as stated in the LA Times headline above, this is what we're talking about.
He doesn't want a system that hires qualified people who cannot be fired except for cause. (Again, for cause, means they have to do something that violates the laws, the rules, or is grossly incompetent or corrupt.) He wants government workers that do his bidding without any resistance, without them telling him 'it's against the law.'
He wants to fire all those people who were hired based on merit (their qualifications to perform the job). These include Democrats, Republicans, and non-partisan employees. He wants to replace them with people whose main qualification is undying loyalty to Trump.
That's pretty much all I want to say.
One of the very best books on this subject is Robert Caro's The Power Broker. It's a biography of Robert Moses who played a major role in getting a merit system in place in New York. It's a massive [1168 pages] book. But it is also riveting as it goes into detail on how the young, idealist Moses evolved into the powerful and corrupt power broker of New York. And in doing so tells the story of the civil service. Not only did the book win the Pulitzer Prize, it was also selected on most lists of the 100 best non-fiction books of the 20th Century. I challenge you to read the first hundred pages and not want to keep turning the pages.
![]() |
Introduction to Robert Caro's The Power Broker |