The Alaska Redistricting Board met in a Statewide call-in to take testimony today on the six maps that were adopted in September for consideration. They have been gathering feedback across the state before submitting the finalized maps.
I took running notes, which are really rough. In 2011-12 I posted such notes because there were no other ways to get the information. This time round the Board is doing a pretty good job of getting the testimony posted on the Board’s website within a week or so.
Today Board member Nicole Borromeo chaired the meeting and Board member Bethany Marcum sat in as well. Board chair John Binkley also listened in and occasionally made comments. They had scheduled times when different parts of the state could call in and get priority. When there were no more callers from that area, they took calls from all over.
Some of my quick impressions:
Fairbanks callers overwhelmingly preferred Board version 4 (v4) and the AFFR maps. And disliked v3. They particularly opposed putting North Pole and Fairbanks into the same district.
Southeast callers still have a bad taste in their mouths about the original maps that cut out Rep. Story from her district and put her against another Democratic incumbent.
There were a couple comments from the Homer area that wanted Fritz Creek to be part of Homer. This reflected a lot of testimony at a previous meeting.
The meeting also got me thinking about the whole issue of what things really are important to be together in state House districts. What’s important and what is merely cosmetic or emotional? I’ll flesh that out in a later post. I’m still thinking it through and trying to bore down to the key elements and not have a lot of fluff.
So, here are my notes. Some caveats first:
GIANT APOLOGY ABOUT PEOPLE’S NAMES!!! I’m listening in via the phone. The Board has the list of people who have called in and want to talk, so they aren’t asking people to spell their names. Leave corrections in the comments or email me (see upper side bar right)
I type as fast as I can and while I once was a pretty good typist, my fingers are getting slower. Also, my ears aren’t as good as they were.
So, what you should expect here is the gist of what people were saying and if there is something important you can look for it when the Board posts the Oct. 30, 2021 testimony.
Assume errors and omissions.
| Some Abbreviations |
SEI = Socio-Economic Integration
FB= Fairbanks;
NP = North Pole
v3 and v4 = Board maps versions 3 and 4
FNSB = Fairbanks North Star Borough
AFFR = Alaskans for Fair Redistricting (3rd Party)
AFFER = Alaskans for Fair and Equitable Redistricting (3rd Party) |
About 10:15 am Nicole Borremeo:
James Squire = Delta, Gulkana - we should be connected with Eilson - they have missiles and so do we. Drainage, geographic features should be part of this process. I sent a map that does a much better job.
Up highway to Eilson, Denali Borough, Clear Air Force - moves the needle of SEI (Socio-Economic Integration) and compactness. Koyukuk drainage.
Directed to use the census numbers. Our area has more PFD applications than shown in our Census Count. No reason to deny them. Privacy. Boundaries in wilderness, not on highways. If you can see campaign signs on both sides of the road, then that’s a problem because those people should be in same district.
Nicole, Marcum - questions?
Casey ?Cafort - Fairbanks. Grown up in FB and NP and two distinct communities, shouldn’t be in one district. FB oriented along river. FMeyer. V3 follows boundaries, but no reason to redistrict. Don’t follow those things precisely in Anchorage. As recent UAF graduate. Hope you keep UAF together - only AFFR map does that now. UAF critical part of our community and economy. Appreciate opportunity to be heard.
Nicole: Thank you.
Kelvin Rogers - Support AFFR and preference for version 4 over 3. V3 makes no sense to me - puts us with NP a place I’ve been a few times over my 6 years in FB. V4 splits up FB along lines that makes sense.
10:19
?Bretta McAdams - grew up in FB, schools here. Learned to drive here. Alaskalands, Blockbusters. Like John Binkley. V3 is political map by former politician that gerrymanders FB. Also divides FB by n-s which is against the Chena River that goes east west. Both AFFR and V4 give us better representation.
10:22
Alissa Franklin? - FB community organizer here for about 21 years. Raised and school and now work as organizer. Really know the community. Others my points as well. Definitely not v3, unnatural to neighborhood, work, etc. V4 and AFFR better job capturing that natural orientation. Why v3 so bad? D31 Ester, Fox, Goldstream, Farmers Loop - that’s a good hours drive to get to Two Rivers. Completely different communities. Talking about neighborhoods - how is this fair to any of these communities. Eilson completely different needs from University. How people compete with each other. Not fair and equitable. How do we best represent these needs without cutting district in half. Majority of POC live in these areas. Access to voting, have to cross two different districts to get to their voting place. AFFER/AFFR? do better job of how we’re laid out, not competing with each other, but picking person who represents our communities/ Wish I could drive you around
Leo Hippert? - Needlessly under represents FB Treated FB differently from other places. Things oriented east west. As U student feel connected to U and Goldstream, Ester, similar values and have one voice on issues. AFFR and v4 represents these, but v3 is bad. AFFR has racial ??? NP and FB different interests.
Nicole - any SEI issues in AFFR maps that you’d like Board to consider. A: Not really didn’t do research on that.
Stuart Chapin - FB for last 50 years. Appreciate importance and glad listening to testimony. Strongly prefer AFFR or v4 and feel v3 divides FB in ways that are not in the best interests. Prefer AFFR for two reasons. V3 under represents FB in state. V3 doesn’t represent various communities that make up FB area. FB along east west along Tanana River. People who share values and service area interests should be grouped together . AFFR much better than v3. Hope you take the FB testimony into consideration because we all agree.
North Pole - Barbara Kendall? 50 years in Alasak. Any plan for NP should include Eilson and Salcha. Where we do shopping, churches, housing. Some adjustment to AFFER plan, but concur that AFFR and v4 would do best. Would increase population a bit - but in NSFB and better aligned.
Q: You like AFFER. Yes. Prefer over v4.
Allison Cafort - lifelong FB resident, grew up in ?? And NP. Now west FB. Distinct communities and shouldn’t be in the same district. V3 does that not good. Also overpopulates. V4 and AFFR follow east west orientation. As current UAF student - keep U and Fox etc. together - where many faculty live. AFFR map.
Lori Huffer? 15 years FB. And unique NP area. Thanks for listening. Support competitive fair and equitable map. NOT v3. Interested in AFFR and V4, better represents our communities. FB and NP seen as separate communities. Thanks for insuring we’ll have appropriate representation by not using v3 and focusing on AFFR and v4.
Q: Any SEI issues? I guess we lost her
Gary Kendall - NP- overview comparisons of versions. Balance several criteria - pop. Compactness, SEI. In interest of representation give more weight than just population . AFFER map seems to be the best balance of factors under consideration. NE corner of D6C - portion goes north of the river and down toward NP, that would be better placed with 9E, NP Moose Creek, based on where people are and work and interests D8D, westward with Badger Road border- move it up and make border along the river better than the road itself. AFFER map does better job of bringing in North Creek Salcha and Eilson . Thank you.
Martha Roberts - final FB in queue for now. 50 years in FB mostly in University and now just north of Farmers loop. Agree with others v3 shouldn’t be used. FB in5 districts all the others have 6 districts. Also separates NP from Eilson. Main testimony is against v3 map. I prefer the Senate minority map which puts my area with ?? Which seems better than with Fox.
Nicole: FB has 5 districts in both v3 and v4.
Martha: Oh, I miscounted. When release Senate pairings?
Nicole: Not yet, plan to do closer to Nov 10. These are still draft form.
Move outside of interior -
Sen. Tom Begich - State senate minority leader, here because Wednesday you asked views on constitutionality. Touch lengthy.
Alaska Court have focused on lover deviations of house districts over time. But Board seems to be moving to maps with higher deviations. Many 3rd party plans have said there can be lower deviations without sacrificing the other criteria. Likelihood v3 and v4 lawsuits because
of deviations.
Those decisions March 21, 2002 Court - priority must be given first to Federal Constitution, VRA, and then to Alaska Constitution. 1. Contiguousness and compactness, SEI, Community boundaries, geographic boundaries. Representation over SEI. Overemphasizing SEI over others is inconsistent.
First you draw the map with Alaska Constitution, then
Reynolds and Brown - federal considerations — Alaska SC found Alaska should have narrower standards. Newly available tech advances make it easy to meet lower deviations. 10% deviations in Anchorage meet federal standards, but burden shifted to board that lower deviations impracticable. If districts can be created with our technology. Boroughs and cities are defined as SEI, then Board is compelled to lower the deviations. As you heard from FB.
All FB and Matsu districts and 16 Anchorage districts are all .14??? And Kenai and SE also .
Focus on deviation emerges
from Hickel and 1998 - AK constitution requires relatively SEI - means we compare to proposed districts to previous districts and alternative districts.
Board reduces FB representation and gives extra FB to other district.
Hickel - excess pop shouldn’t be given to other districts. It may be necessary to divide a borough, however where possible all the excess population should go to one district. You want to give representation to those who deserve it. Board maps don’t that Proportional representation.
Board’s counsel has interpreted this differently. Kenai Peninsula Borough …. Recognizes that it shouldn’t divide the municipalities, was open for legitimate non-discriminate polices. In that passage, court conclusion honed in on MOA and Matsu B’s together because fractional seats. That’s important. Underscores how interpreted by the courts and how interpreted now.
Footnote seven: 2002 case Matsu 3.8 and Anch - .? Would support 20.4 seats. But Board gets 17 and Matsu gets 4 for 21 seats. Saying because way board did it, created an additional seat. Today, the over pop 5.8 for Matsu and 15.8 of Anchorage would create total of 16 + 6. Excess then 2001 combining excess would be excess of ??? Seats and would have to look north or south to do that excess. West was not excluded as an option. Can’t be absorbed - 2001 told board to take hard look at north. Now, today Board trying to do that. Kenai, Matsu, Anch. And FB need low deviations meeting standards. AFFR maps do this. Board is compelled to meet standards of 3rd party maps.
Cordova with SE? Court acknowledged to Baranof Island would be compact, but further would not. Including Cordova in D5 to reduces deviation. That ruling allows Board to consider Cordova with SE to reduce deviation.
ER and Anch - part of SEI of Anchorage, but compelling testimony should ER be separate. 2 districts from ER and Peters Creek. Might be compelling to combine house districts in this area into single Senate seat. Anchorage neighborhoods substantial dispareity. SEI - multiple compact continuous districts. In Groh we considered ….
If low deviations can be met without sacrificing AK constitutional criteria, it’s important.
Kenai- less disruption to overall map, should be considered. Multiple ways to do Anch and FB under 1.4% deviation SE - more mathematical precision in urban areas. Limits opportunities for gerrymandering.
AK court has ruled that Delta Junction (2001) has no constitutional right to be in a single house district, as long as each portion is integrated. Board should take hard look - Saxman is part of borough, more connected to Ketchikan than with other Native districts in SE.
How you arrived at higher deviations is what matters.
Lengthy answer - hope it answers your questions.
Nicole: Thank you. Board did ask for clarification and apology. Clarification - Board chose John Binkley to chair meeting but we are all equals.
Returning to Fairbanks:
Darla Hudson? - short comment. Don’t support v3. No sense to put FB with NP. Been here for ??30 yers. Listening to Mr. Squires - not grouping Delta with Koyakuk. Natural borders. ??
Eilson and Salcha do most shopping in FB, not in Delta.
Christina Buckington?? - After reviewing maps, Doyon coalition along with aspects v4 and Minority Senate map. Do not support v3. Donut shape Doyon keeps contiguous urban and rural areas together. Also integrate tribal communities. Minority map keeps communities together though I haven’t reviewed the map beyond FB area.
Mindy O’Neall - Presiding officer of FNSB Assembly - voted - stayed away from comments about one map. Biggest concern - general underpopulation of overpopulated districts. FB has right to 5 plus districts. Ask that extra population be put into a single district. Due to urban nature it’s unnecessary to require to go through other districts to get to other side of districts.
Neighborhoods that share values and common - Excess pop into one district rather than spreading among five districts.
Nicole: clarify - testify on behalf of NSB Assembly A: Yes
Ellen Murray McKazy? - Live - 2007 retired from teaching at UAF. AFFR map best for us. Binkley map out of balance. Would have me with NP. Not my community. Overpopulates us. Underprepresented and Matsu and Anch overrep. Does not match east-west orientation of FB.
V4 and AFFR maps respect east west divide. First choice is AFFR map. Second v4. Thank you for considering my opinion and for your work.
Nicole: switch to SE, Kodiak, Kenai
??? I wanted to voice opinion of Kachemak, Homer on Kenai. I oppose v3 spell my name:
No thanks Terry, we have info already. Board proposed maps v3 and v4 strongly oppose. Seperating Fitz Creek from Homer makes no sense.
Don’t understand Doyon map very well - Sen Minority looks very logical to me as well as the AFFER Kenai Peninsula looks logical. Alll the others including AFFR makes no sense. Separating Frizt Creek is out of the question.
Nicole: We did Homer area weeks ago and others made same point.
SE callers:
Mr. Witte??? I can’t do better than Sen Begich, but would add minimizing deviation so opposed to v3 and v4 and support Doyon, AFFR, and Senate Minority because they have smaller deviations. Oppose AFFER because of Mendenhall - and v3 because of obvious intentional carving out rep Story.
Nicole: For the record, the Story was corrected early on the map. Can I ask a question about the deviation. United Ketchikan Wrangell borough - keep Prince of Wales?
I’m in Juneau and I’ll leave that to SE people.
Nicole - divide between Juneau and Valley?
Mr. Valley homogenous in terms of economics AFFR and Sen Democrats have minor differences but keep valley as one district.
Jaeleen Kookesh - Sealaska Corp - thank Board for their service. Appreciate opportunity to comment. Sealaska proud to work with Coalition with Doyon- urge to consider this map. Specifically to issues of importance. Borders of house districts inSE. Rural Alaskan communities and support of Doyon around FB and NSB.
SE: Compact, contiguous and SEI population 3.89 districts - two senate seats and four districts. Preferred SE Alaska Island district. Angoon, Kake, Sitka. Key feature of SE is islands. With exception of Admiralty Island in north. Some options for Juneau. [Can’t keep up with details] Many rural communities with areas that do not share concerns and culture. We support our coalition partners for rural communities
3. Concerns about FB v3 map. About 800 people more in each district. Will submit written testimony. Want to thank you. History my late father lost his seat in rural Alaska.
Nicole: can PofWales Island be split?
Kookesh: We didn’t look at breaking up communities. Looking at PoW - at least the traditional Native communities stay together. Don’t want to speak for the island.
Nicole: If you of PoW contacts, please have them contact us.
11:40
Jim Ayers- Thank you for service, maps and tables. Worked in Juneau for most of 40 years - Douglas, Auk Bay. Worked with some of you and respect you very much. Our community is wonderful place to live, work, raise a family. Community works well. Talked to you a few weeks ago. Community naturally meeting the fair, balanced, non-partisan way - Valley flow together. Downtown flow together. V3 and v4 bring divisiveness. Board says they corrected concerns about line cutting out Story. I heard that - if that correction you referred to mean you are no longer pursuing that?
Nicole: yes it was corrected. Unfortunate software glitch. No intention to pit current elected representatives. Board has no knowledge where representative live. No intention to pit incumbents against each other or protect them.
Ayers: State suffers from continuing strife and divisiveness. Imperative you consider whether you actions increase that divisiveness in our state. I worked with Bill Hudson. He was elected in Juneau several times and he likely would be elected again. If there is a reason or motivation of some to change the representatives we’ve elected, they should choose a candidate and not change the district to achieve your goals. Support Doyon, and ?? maps. Urge you to do right thing for us. And thank you again for your public servie.
Nicole: Question from John Binkley
Binkley: I have Borromeo’s comments - I believe the architect of that area in v3 and v4 have - there was an appendage and what you’re suggesting it was ?? [hard to understand I think he’s emphasizing it was accidental.] We decided not to formally make those changes. Just making maps - public hearing process [can’t understand, bad connection]
Ayers; 30 second Response? Thank you so much Sen. We’ve known each other a long time and great respect for you. And firmly believe in your forthrightness and what you’ve said. I’ve looked at maps. I don’t support v3 and v4. I do support Doyon and irrespective of politics, I do believe you’ll look at the best aspects of the redistricting.
John: I’ll call back in and try to get better connection.
Nicole
Susan Warner in Gustavus. Thank you for your work to fairly redistrict and for offering Doyon map that retains connection with Juneau and Haines. Please consider D33 boundaries to have a say in our inside waters adjacent to our community.
11:58am Nicole: that includes all the callers we have in queue.
Juli Lucky: We will be available until 4pm to call in.
Calls will be prioritized by time for areas, but anyone can call.
12:34 Caller from Juneau
?? Lyman - some maps left me horror struck. Most favor Senate Minority map. Don’t know how ? Harbor put together - or putting representatives together, clear gerrymandering. My preference is Senate minority map.
Nicole: comments from Board. Ms. Lyman, the board is committed to a fair map and no intentional gerrymandering.
Times for certain regions: SE currently, PWS and Kodiak, but no calls in line so anyone can call now.
1pm Kenai Pen. Anchorage Matsu
2pm Northwest (I think that’s what she said)
3pm Statewide
12:43
Caller from Fairbanks
Leslie Peters - live just south of Chena Pump Road, since 1975. Past redistricting. This time since I’m retired I had time to look at maps carefully. Don’t agree with v3 or v4. I prefer plan forAFFR, less community division and less deviation. Allows North Pole to have its own rep. I’ve worked and taken class at University and don’t have that much in common with other places. More in common with peoples over the ridge. Mr. Binkley know that. Putting districts in direct conflict. Should look at AFFR maps. Thank you for your efforts, has to be tough task.
Binkley: thank you Leslie for coming out and testifying and paying attention. It is hard, daunting putting all the pieces together statewide. To get the best possible map. We share a district, we’re neighbors. Do we keep the district as a whole or take the extra .2 population. Which part of FB do we send to that extra district? West side? Eilson? Or the North side? Or keep it altogether even tho overpopulated.
Leslie: Thank you. I looked at deviation numbers and I understand that. Biggest reason tried to find those that have less deviation. Thanks for listening.
12:48 Andrea Dewees - calling from SE Lifelong Alaskan. In support of map proposed by the Senate Minority, best for SE. Appreciate your considering interests of voters not incumbents. I like how Juneau is grouped.
12:52
Catherine Heinz? Thanks for having this on a Saturday. I live in Two Rivers, a pretty gerrymandered district and I hope this will change. I think you know what I’m talking about. I looked at proposed changes and want to throw my support to v4 or Doyon. Want to see the communities united and not spread out - like Chena Hotsprings. That’s all.
Binkley: Thanks for participating. I appreciate what you’re saying over past cycles - your current rep is from Tok and that’s difficult for someone in NSFB is difficult.
Catherine: I realize that represent statewide issues as much as when my neighbors talk about what’s important to us and whether this person in Tok knows anything about our neighborhood, schools, etc. A huge district that person has to carry and canvas. Not useful.
Binkley: I appreciate that. Question before us really is do we keep the whole Borough together in five overpopulated districts or do we break it apart and send a small portion to a rural district.
12:59
1:05 Anchorage Chelsea ?? Support the AFFR map. Only one that fairly represents the diverse communities of east Anchorage, Mountain View and downtown. Not connected to ER. Although the board may prefer one of their own maps, I’m hoping they consider AFFR. I live in South Anchorage. AFFR doesn’t pair hillside with East Anchorage.
Nicole: Any SEI criteria to consider?
Not at this time, but I’ll get back to you if they come up.
1:33 Christopher Constant - speaking personally. Not as chair of Assembly redistricting committee. PreferAFFR map. ER kept separate. ER has own perspective. Govt Hill connected with ER is several maps that are politically opposite with how we live and organize our lives. ER prides itself on large maps, wells and sewer system. In my neighborhood small lots, city utilities. Listen to ER they have been clamoring for their own city. They have unity of demographics and economics that is very different from our community. So strongly urge you to use AFFR map.
2pm - Alaska NW Districts now
John Sowell??? Juneau Concern with redistricting maps. Against each other. Takeoverof the country. Adding districts to make up imbalance. We’ll be in SC. Hope we do. I am aware the intention is to have story. I think there is something untoward about redistricting. Maintain our representation . That’s about it. Thanks. Not much business this afternoon. Do want to be more specific. Can’t give. Representation here in Juneau. Thank you.
2:12
Kotzebue - John Lincoln - President of NANA regional corporations. 15,000 shareholders in NW Alaska including Buckland And Deering. Keeping our SE Integrated together. Clear evidence of
Roads, ancient social ties and more. All testifiers in Kotzebue want to keep Buckland And Deering together.
3:09 - John Rasmon? - FB would like to keep Salcha, Wainright, and ?? together.
Nicole: Thanks for your clear preference of v4.
3:15 back Anchorage
Diane Preston - After navigating your website you did a lot of work. AFFR and AFFER maps hard to navigate. AFFR map seems the best. AFFER pairs me with Chena Hot springs road and separates me with my across the street neighbors. Senate Minority also splits my neighborhood too. V4 keeps me with my neighbors. AFFR looks the best for Fairbanks.
3:29 Anchorage caller
Laura ?? AFFR plan shows all neighborhoods equally represented no district varying more than 36 people. Only one that fairly groups downtown, mt. View, Fairview. Doesn’t group downtown with JBER. Follows community council districts as much as possible. Has Chugiak and ER form own Senate district. Eagle Exit wants to separate so they should have their own Senator.
3:47 pm caller from Fairbanks
Mary Elizabeth ??? - here over 30 years. Important to all of us. My issue concern with v3 not fair for the Borrough. According to the Census, we should get 5.23 house seats. Five seats for the borough and then one other seat with the excess population. Should go to an adjoining district to meet one person one vote standard.
Binkley: What part should be put into an adjacent district?
Mary Elizabeth ?? - West side - they have their own style.
Binkley - where do we put the extra 4000 people - go into a district with representative far away - people complained about being represented by someone from Tok.
4pm
Nicole Borromeo, also online Bethany Marcum and Chair John Binkley have been online and we are signing off now. Adjourned.
