This barrier and sign have been at this alley since last fall, maybe September or October. Some utility did some work in the alley then left. But they also left the sign behind. I called MLP and asked if it were their sign and if not could they check with other utilities who might have left it.
But it's still here in January.
Maybe it belongs to a contractor. I couldn't find any identifiers on it. I'm thinking about offering it on Craigslist. Anyone leaving something like this lying around for three months is guilty of littering and surely this could qualify as abandoned.
On RoadTrafficSigns.com you can buy a Road Closed sign like this from $42 to $72 depending on the quality. I suspect this is the cheaper quality. And I found similar traffic barricades ranging from $463 to $896.
You'd think someone would have notice these missing.
Well, if you lost these, let me know and I'll tell you where they are. Or if you're looking for something like this, I'll tell you too.
[Sorry for those seeing this reposted - Feedburner problems again. This seems to be getting all too common.]
Pages
- About this Blog
- AIFF 2024
- AK Redistricting 2020-2023
- Respiratory Virus Cases October 2023 - ?
- Why Making Sense Of Israel-Gaza Is So Hard
- Alaska Daily COVID-19 Count 3 - May 2021 - October 2023
- Alaska Daily COVID-19 Count - 2 (Oct. 2020-April 2021)
- Alaska Daily COVID-19 Count 1 (6/1-9/20)
- AIFF 2020
- AIFF 2019
- Graham v Municipality of Anchorage
- Favorite Posts
- Henry v MOA
- Anchorage Assembly Election April 2017
- Alaska Redistricting Board 2010-2013
- UA President Bonus Posts
- University of Alaska President Search 2015
Showing posts with label lost causes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lost causes. Show all posts
Friday, January 15, 2016
Sunday, October 19, 2014
"Lost Causes Are The Only Ones Worth Fighting For" - Should Parnell Keep Fighting Same-Sex Marriage?
A lot of people are criticizing Governor Parnell's decision to continue to appeal the rulings allowing same-sex partners to get married in Alaska. Mainly, they argue, given the Ninth Circuit and US Supreme Courts' recent actions, appealing is a lost cause. But are no lost causes worth fighting for? Which ones would you fight for? Which wouldn't you? And what factors make the difference? I'm going to start that discussion in this post.
"Lost Causes Are The Only Ones Worth Fighting For"
After the death of a US senator in the movie Mr. Smith Goes To Washington Mr. Smith (Jimmy Stewart) is appointed to take his place. His hero is the senior Senator from his state, Mr. Paine. But Smith learns that Mr. Paine is supporting corrupt legislation and Smith filibusters to stop the legislation. Near the end of the filibuster, tired and near collapse, Mr. Smith says:
What Exactly Does It Mean?
"Lost causes are the only ones worth fighting for." If might be good rhetoric, but it really doesn't make any sense. It implies that good causes that have a chance of winning aren't worth fighting for. That's clearly not the case. It's a phrase, spoken passionately though, that might sway an unthinking audience
And it wasn't the last word on lost causes in the movie either If you watched the video clip to the end, you heard that Jimmy Stewart didn't stop there. He gives a rule for why you fight lost causes.
That makes a lot more sense, but again, this is rhetoric. It sounds good. "Love thy neighbor" is a sentiment many will agree with (until they think about the neighbor who leaves his barking dog outside in the cold all day) but is it really the only reason to fight lost causes?
I'm going to end this post here and in a near (I hope) future post, try to come up with a model of lost cause situations. I've already come up with a list of different situations that onlookers might label a lost cause. I'll try to tease out of these examples, a way to evaluate how noble any specific lost cause situation is.
Here are a couple I've thought of so far:
One friend I chatted with about this said I was making this too complicated. It's just about power and the election. That may well be the case. But I hate to jump to conclusions about other people's intentions. And such a model surely will have usefulness in other situations.
"Lost Causes Are The Only Ones Worth Fighting For"
After the death of a US senator in the movie Mr. Smith Goes To Washington Mr. Smith (Jimmy Stewart) is appointed to take his place. His hero is the senior Senator from his state, Mr. Paine. But Smith learns that Mr. Paine is supporting corrupt legislation and Smith filibusters to stop the legislation. Near the end of the filibuster, tired and near collapse, Mr. Smith says:
"I guess this is just another lost cause, Mr. Paine. All you people don't know about lost causes. Mr. Paine does. He said once they were the only causes worth fighting for, and he fought for them once, for the only reason that any man ever fights for them."Here's the clip of that scene:
What Exactly Does It Mean?
"Lost causes are the only ones worth fighting for." If might be good rhetoric, but it really doesn't make any sense. It implies that good causes that have a chance of winning aren't worth fighting for. That's clearly not the case. It's a phrase, spoken passionately though, that might sway an unthinking audience
And it wasn't the last word on lost causes in the movie either If you watched the video clip to the end, you heard that Jimmy Stewart didn't stop there. He gives a rule for why you fight lost causes.
". . . for the only reason that any man ever fights for them. Because of just one plain, simple rule, "Love thy neighbor,"
That makes a lot more sense, but again, this is rhetoric. It sounds good. "Love thy neighbor" is a sentiment many will agree with (until they think about the neighbor who leaves his barking dog outside in the cold all day) but is it really the only reason to fight lost causes?
I'm going to end this post here and in a near (I hope) future post, try to come up with a model of lost cause situations. I've already come up with a list of different situations that onlookers might label a lost cause. I'll try to tease out of these examples, a way to evaluate how noble any specific lost cause situation is.
Here are a couple I've thought of so far:
- Searching for a missing child, all leads are cold, and the odds of finding her now are low to nil.
- Fighting an armed battle, grossly outnumbered and outgunned, against an enemy who tortures and kills their captives.
- Refusing to divulge information about your fellow rebels to your torturer.
- Refusing to accept a plea bargain because you know you are innocent, even though there are witnesses who swear they saw you and you’ll get life, when you could bargain for a lighter sentence.
One friend I chatted with about this said I was making this too complicated. It's just about power and the election. That may well be the case. But I hate to jump to conclusions about other people's intentions. And such a model surely will have usefulness in other situations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)