So much . . .
Weekly trips to pick up our CSA (Community Supported Agriculture) [It's a USDA website so go quick before the regime either takes it down because it's too 'woke' or it crashes from neglect or incompetence.]


![]() |
From Animalspot.net |
So much . . .
Weekly trips to pick up our CSA (Community Supported Agriculture) [It's a USDA website so go quick before the regime either takes it down because it's too 'woke' or it crashes from neglect or incompetence.]
![]() |
From Animalspot.net |
I had some kitchen tasks to do - preparing some meals, baking a bread - so I asked Netflix for music and they gave me tick tick Boom as the first choice. I loved it when I first watched it; enough to watch it again. And so I put it on a third time. It was still good. Though I'm tempted to blame me not paying enough attention to the bread and screwing it up.
So let me recommend it here for folks with Netflix.
It's musical written by Jonathon Larson, about Jonathan Larson writing an earlier musical that never got performed. It shows the artist with a vision in his head that's keeping him poor because it's taking him years to get it on paper. He lives in a 5th floor walkup apartment in New York with his long time school friend, an aspiring actor.
The movie switches back and forth from Jonathon talking to an audience about the story and the actual events he's telling the audience. Music is never more than a beat away.
Andrew Garfield is amazing as Larson.
But more. Jonathan Larson, if you don't know (I didn't) went on to write Rent next. So we are essentially seeing the story of his struggle to survive in New York writing his musicals, waiting tables at a diner, until he makes it. All the while he thinks in music and lyrics.
Inspiring for people who are feeling despair at today's political situation.
But the music and the story are also captivating. And the dancing.
If you need more convincing, the movie was directed by Lin-Manual Miranda, the genius behind Hamilton! Here's a trailer.
Here are the lyrics of the song at the end of the trailer.
from: https://genius.com/Jonathan-larson-why-lyrics
Actions speak louder than
(Louder than, louder than)
Words
What does it take
To wake up a generation?
[ALL]
How can you make someone
Take off and fly?
[JON]
If we don't wake up
And shake up the nation
We'll eat the dust
Of the world wondering why
[JON]
Why do we follow leaders who never lead?
[MICHAEL]
Why does it take catastrophe to start a revolution
[MICHAEL and SUSAN]
If we're so free?
Tell me why
[JON]
Someone tell me why
So many people bleed
[JON] [MICHAEL and SUSAN]
Cages or wings, Cages or wings
Which do you prefer?
Ask the birds Ah:
You can see more video on the Combo's website.
The guitarist, Jason, did most of the explanations between pieces. But Rebecca was clearly the master musician. Her fingers flew effortless from note to note. She's truly a gifted and passionate cellist.
So here's a little more about her from Oakland Symphony website.
"Rebecca Roudman
Cello
Equally at home as a renowned classical cello player or on the cutting edge of pop music, Rebecca Roudman is one of the San Francisco Bay Area’s most exciting crossover cellists.
As a member of both the Oakland East-Bay Symphony and the Santa Rosa Symphony, Rebecca is an experienced orchestral musician who has toured with orchestras to Brazil and throughout Europe. While developing her classical skills, Rebecca studied with both Larry Granger of the San Francisco Symphony and Gretchen Elliot, one of Janos Starker’s students. Rebecca has premiered numerous classical and contemporary works, many of
which were written for her."
Because she played so effortlessly, the cello seemed to be an extension of her fingers. I asked her afterward whether she took to the cello from the beginning. She shook her head with an emphatic no. I think she said she started at six and struggled. It was ten years before she felt completely comfortable with the instrument.
That's it. Short and sweet.
I was in sunny Anchorage yesterday, not in the path of the eclipse. But in 2019 my daughter invited us to meet her and her family to see an eclipse in San Juan, Argentina. It was a memorable experience out in the desert. But at the time I was a bit disappointed that it didn't get really dark, just dusk-like. My image of an eclipse was that day turned to night for a minute or so.
My daughter went to Texas to see yesterday's eclipse. It was cloudy, but the sun poked out through the clouds so they could see the moon covering over the sun, part of the time. But because it was cloudy, it also got much darker than it was in Argentina.
So, two things about eclipses:
1. Watching the sun covered by the moon. You can only do that if you have special glasses or other way to darken the image. Otherwise the brightness of the sun makes it impossible to see the eclipsing moon.
2. Experience the change from full daylight to night. As you can see in the picture (sort of, since the camera's auto lighting affects things a bit) it got twilight in Argentina but not so dark you needed lights if you were driving - as my daughter reported happened yesterday. So clouds don't completely ruin an eclipse. You experience more darkness than without clouds.
SPRING
Anchorage had near record snow for the year - about three inches less than the snowiest winter - so there's still a lot of snow. But we're seeing larger areas of snowless ground - under the bigger trees in the back yard and along the edges of the snow piles. Here's Campbell Creek on March 28
And here it is on April 7, ten days later. Somewhat disappointing that there is now a large piece of trash in the creek. The trails along the main streets are clear of snow, but the trails along the creeks through the woods still covered.
The two days of sunshine reminded me that April has often been a wonderful month, but today we have a heavy cloud cover again. [I just looked up. It's snowing out. I really don't need enough snow to set the record.]
PRINTER CARTRIDGES
Lots of people have complained about the printer cartridge scam. You buy an inexpensive printer, only to be stuck for buying ink cartridges for outrageous prices.
"Financial PerformanceIn 2023, HP Inc.'s revenue was $53.72 billion, a decrease of -14.61% compared to the previous year's $62.91 billion. Earnings were $3.26 billion, an increase of 4.18%."
A friend sent me a link to an audio program about the music of the Holocaust - music written and performed by concentration camp musicians. The program is very sad and very inspiring at the same time. Worth listening to.
I don't see a way to embed the audio here, so here's a link to the website that has it:
https://www.blogger.com/u/0/blog/post/edit/30897652/6944961309403824554
Well worth a listen when you are doing something you can do while listening.
The transcript begins:
"Mat Edelson (HOST): To be a Jewish composer or musician under the Third Reich’s reign of terror meant your next note could be your last. At first their works were banned as being degenerate, their contributions to the musical canon erased from public display. Later, as the murderous frenzy exploded in the ghettos and concentration camps, composers and musicians imprisoned there refused to be stilled. On scraps of paper they penciled their inspirations, praying that even if they died, their music would survive. Miraculously, it has. In this documentary, we’ll meet conductors, musicians and others rediscovering this lost generation of music and performing it for new audiences worldwide. They’re using this music to educate, to remember, and to correct an historical injustice. Join us now for Their Music Survives.?
A Spout today linked me to an amazing essay by Steve Silberman: "Broken Time “NARDIS” AND THE CURIOUS HISTORY OF A JAZZ OBSESSION" on Bill Evans and Miles Davis' Nardis in The Believer.
I'm a casual jazz fan. Sort of like I'm a casual birder. I go out of my way to observe birds, but I don't obsess. I don't keep a life list. And I'm more an unquestioning appreciator of jazz, but not someone who could tell you why I like it or the technical things the musicians are doing that captures my attention. Nancy Wilson probably is the person to blame.
Of course, I've heard the name Bill Evans. Usually a when a KJAZZ announcer says something like, "and Bill Evans on the piano." That usually happens after the piece was played.
Anyhoo, this essay kept me in bed reading this morning. (Yes, I know. It's not a good idea to look at my phone in bed, but so what?)
So just listen to the Bill Evans Trio as you read the article. This is the first recording in 1961 with Scott LaFaro and Paul Motian.
Or if you don't think you have time for a long article, here are some excerpts while you listen:
"But things started going wrong even before Mitchell arrived at Reeves Sound Studios on East Forty-Fourth Street. First, his luggage went astray en route from Florida. Then there was a surprise waiting for him in the control room: Miles Davis, one of his musical heroes, who had taken the extraordinary step of composing a new melody as a gift to Cannonball. Mitchell was supposed to play Miles’s part.
That wasn’t going to be easy, because the tune, called “Nardis,” was anything but a standard workout on blues-based changes. The melody had a haunting, angular, exotic quality, like the “Gypsy jazz” that guitarist Django Reinhardt played with the Hot Club de France in the 1930s. And it didn’t exactly swing, but unfurled at its own pace, like liturgical music for some arcane ritual. For three takes, the band diligently tried to make it work, but Mitchell couldn’t wrap his head around it, particularly under Miles’s intimidating gaze. The producer of the session, legendary Riverside Records founder Orrin Keepnews, ended up scrapping the night’s performances entirely.
The next night was more productive. After capturing tight renditions of “Blue Funk” and “Minority,” the quintet took two more passes through “Nardis,” yielding a master take for release, plus a credible alternate. But the arrangement still sounded stiff, and the horns had a pinched, sour tone.
Only one man on the session, Miles would say later, played the tune “the way it was meant to be played.” It was the shy, unassuming piano player, who was just shy of twenty-eight years old. His name was Bill Evans."
. . .
"By now I’ve heard so many different interpretations, in such a far-flung variety of settings, that a Platonic ideal of the melody resides in my mind untethered to any actual performance. It’s as if “Nardis” were always going on somewhere, with players dropping in and out of a musical conversation beyond space and time."
, , ,
"When Russell first mentioned Evans’s name, Miles asked, “Is he white?”
“Yeah,” Russell replied.
“Does he wear glasses?”
“Yeah.”
“I know that motherfucker,” Miles said. “I heard him at Birdland—he can play his ass off.” Indeed, the first time Evans played a beginner’s intermission set at the Village Vanguard—Max Gordon’s basement club, the Parnassus of jazz—the pianist was astonished to look up and see the legendary trumpeter standing there, listening intently."
. . .
"By the time he recorded the tracks on Kind of Blue, however, Evans had already decided to leave Miles’s band. After his baptism of fire on the road, he was physically, mentally, and spiritually exhausted, but he also felt more confident about pursuing his own vision. He had a specific goal in mind: achieving a level of communication in a piano trio that would enable all three players to make creative statements and respond to one another conversationally, without any of them being obliged to explicitly state the beat. This approach came to be known as “broken time,” because no player was locked into a traditional time-keeping role; instead the one was left to float, in an implied pulse shared by all the players. Evans compared broken time to the kind of typography in which the raised letters are visible only in the shadows they cast.
That kind of collective sympathy, akin to three-way telepathy, demanded major commitment from the trio, and required high levels of personal chemistry. Evans met the perfect fellow travelers in two young musicians named Scott LaFaro and Paul Motian."
. . .
"Evans was a polite junkie. For decades, he kept tabs on how much money he owed various friends, and he always endeavored to pay them back, even if his benefactor had long forgotten the debt. But among the people disturbed by his accelerating decline was the fearlessly outspoken LaFaro, who had no problem confronting the pianist in the bluntest terms. “You’re fucking up the music,” he would say. “Look in the mirror!”
It was in this combative atmosphere that Evans made his second attempt to commit “Nardis” to vinyl, at Bell Sound Studios, on February 2, 1961, under Keepnews’s watchful eye. Though Keepnews gamely tried to keep everyone’s spirits up, the whole session seemed jinxed, with Evans and LaFaro openly arguing about the pianist’s drug use and Evans suffering a splitting headache. By the time the ordeal was over, both the players and the producer assumed that the tapes would be quietly filed away and never released. “We had a very, very bad feeling,” Evans recalled. “We felt there was nothing happening.”
Listening back, however, everyone was shocked to discover how well the trio had played. Upon the album’s release, Explorations was hailed by critics for its bold, unsentimental reinvention of well-worn standards like “Sweet and Lovely” and “How Deep Is the Ocean,” the dynamism of the group’s interactions, and the sublime sensitivity of Evans’s phrasing and voicings. Humbled by the inadequacy of his own ability to judge how well the session had gone, Evans began to think of “the mind that thinks jazz” as something larger than the consciousness of any individual musician, as if the music organized itself at a higher order of awareness that wasn’t always discernible to the players. The rendition of “Nardis” that appears on the album, a refinement of the arrangement that the trio had been playing on the road, became the default canonical version in the absence of a Miles original—the basis for twenty years of Evans’s performances, and for hundreds of interpretations by others."
And here's Bill Evans live in Paris in 1979 playing a very different Nardis with his second trio members.
"In 1979, the pianist formed a new trio with bassist Marc Johnson and drummer Joe LaBarbera. The presence of Johnson in particular—who was, in the words of former trio drummer Eliot Zigmund, “very young and open, and very, very respectful of Bill”—seemed to revitalize the pianist, and for the first time in years, he sounded like he was searching again. After buying a cassette recorder, he began taping and listening to his own performances, going all the way back to unreleased music he’d made with LaFaro and Motian. He was also paying close attention to the work of the young pianists he had generously mentored over the years. After listening to a solo recording by Warren Bernhardt called Floating, he told his girlfriend, Laurie Verchomin, that he had entered a state of bliss, hearing 'the music between the notes.'”
Note: Someone in the household heard me listing to whole the 1979 album, responded, "It sounds like 'hold' music." While parts are soft, slow, and soothing, this is definitely not hold music, but it would be nice if it were used that way.
I've been taking notes and trying to figure out how to post about this in a way that gets the point across, without putting everyone to sleep. But that, of course, assumes I know the point. Sunday, I came up with this overview of my dilemma.
This chart is more or less in the order I tackled the problem. But at this point it seems to make more sense to start with 5 and go backwards. [I've since decided to add #1 at the end of this post.]NUMBER 5: Probably the easiest for me and for the reader is to start with number 5.
This is what's been playing in my head for a while and I think it's apt:
"How do you solve a problem like Maria, How do you catch a cloud and pin it down"
So you can listen to this song as you read this:
Valdez has about 4000 people. There are no other similar population centers anywhere near Valdez. The closest population centers are Anchorage, Mat-Su, and Fairbanks - but they aren't very close. Southeast Alaska has four districts worth of population. It basically has to go up from the south because the southern and eastern borders are Canada. The western border is the Pacific Ocean. I've thought they could use Prince Rupert, but, of course, they can't.
Valdez has been paired with Mat-Su and it's been paired with the Richardson Highway up almost to Fairbanks. Essentially, Valdez is the thorn in redistricting boards' side. It's essentially a white oil community connected by water to fishing communities and by land to some areas with more Alaska Natives.
So lets go to #4 and look at maps.
NUMBER 4: Where is Valdez now and where did the different proposed maps put Valdez?
First, let's look at the current district that includes Valdez - from the 2013 Proclamation plan. [Not interactive.] I've circled Valdez in red - bottom, middle right. The district goes to Whittier in Prince William Sound, includes the Richardson Highway communities along the pipeline (Valdez is the terminus of the Alaska pipeline) almost up to Fairbanks and also goes into Mat-Su.
Click on image to enlarge |
Second, let's look at the 2021 Proclamation map for Valdez - in D 29. The link will let you look at the map in greater detail. This is the map that Valdez is protesting.
District 29-O does NOT include the Richardson Highway, nor does it go anywhere near Fairbanks or the other communities along the pipeline. Instead it goes deep into Mat-Su, smack up against Palmer and Wasilla. But in this district, since the Richardson Highway is mostly in the neighboring district, people in Wasilla driving to the Matsu part of their district have to travel out of D-29 on the Richardson Highway. Below you can see how Route 4 - the Richardson Highway - is in the tan colored district (36-R), the district the Valdez folks want to be in. Not only is Valdez in a different House district, but also a different Senate district. If you look at the map on the Board's website, you can see that for the most part the Highway is in District 36-R. (If it weren't, then the people in 36-R would have to leave their district to travel to other communities in their district. But this raises questions of contiguity, a Constitutional requirement for districts.
Third, AFFER and Senate Minority Plans put Valdez with Kodiak and goes into the Lake and Peninsula Borough, bordering Anchorage from the west and Mat-Su from the west and south. These two maps are very similar - I can only see some differences around the Homer area. This is probably not surprising because the architects of these maps - Randy Ruedrich and Tom Begich - have been doing this for years and this reflects a similar current district that connects Cordova to Kodiak. (But does not include Valdez.)
Fourth, we have the Doyon Coalition map. They've put Prince William Sound all together in one district - with Cordova and Whittier. But it cuts Valdez from the Richardson Highway communities the lawsuit says they belong with, and also takes the district to the edge of Palmer in Mat-Su. But this looks like the most compact district. The Coalition wants to keep various Native Corporation villages in the same districts.
Fifth, we have the AFFR map. This puts Valdez in a sprawling district that does keep them connected with the Richardson Highway communities, almost into Fairbanks, around Fairbanks, and also gets them into Mat-Su near Palmer. But the few people who mentioned specific maps at the Valdez hearing said they preferred this map.
Finally, we have a map - Valdez Option 1 - that is attached to the lawsuit - which Valdez is proposing.
It connects Valdez with Prince William Sound communities of Cordova and Whittier and goes up along the Richardson Highway. But it would also require the Board to make a LOT of changes to other districts and there will be complaints from the Doyon Coalition among others I'm sure.
So this should give you something to chew on. I've put links to the Board's interactive maps for each of these maps so you can see the details if you wish.
I'm also going to skip to #1 - an outline of the Valdez legal challenge, with my additions in blue. Part 2 will be #3 and #2.
NUMBER 1: OUTLINE OF VALDEZ COURT FILINGS
I've condensed the filings and added (in blue) some of the things they've cited or notes you I thought would help
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT VALDEZ
- On November 10, 2021, the Alaska Redistricting Board (“Board”), pursuant to its constitutional authority under Article VI of the Alaska Constitution, promulgated a new redistricting plan to govern legislative elections in Alaska for the next decade. This plan places Valdez into House and Senate Districts in violation of
- The Open Meetings Act,
- Article VI, Sections 6 and 10 of the Alaska Constitution, and
- the equal protection and
- due process clauses of the Alaska Constitution.
- This Complaint seeks
- judicial review of the Board’s redistricting plan and
- an order invalidating that plan and
- requiring the Board to redraw the districts in accordance with the Alaska Constitution
PARTIES
2-11 - City of Valdez, and Mark Detter, a resident of Valdez,
The Board and each member.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
12-13
ALLEGATIONS
14- 42 There are almost 30 allegations here. It would have been more helpful if these were better tied to the Five Claims at the end. One has to go through these 28 allegations and match them to the claims. I’ll try.
First Claim - Violation of the Open Meetings Act
43-48 http://www.touchngo.com/lglcntr/akstats/statutes/title44/chapter62/section310.htm Gets you to Open Meetings Act - not long, but too much to add it all here
43. Paragraphs 1 through 42 are incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
44. The Board, as a governmental body of a public entity of the state, is subject to the requirements of AS 44.62.310-320 (“Opening Meetings Act”). The deliberations and decisions of the Board are activities covered by the Open Meetings Act.
45. Upon information and belief, the Board has violated the Open Meetings Act in the following ways:
(a) It conducted deliberations in secret.
(b) It failed to properly conduct votes.
(c) It conducted a serial meeting.
(d) It withheld documents from the public that were used in formulating the final redistricting plan.
(e) It failed to clearly and with specificity state the subject(s) of each executive session or its reasons for addressing the subject(s) in executive session.
46. Plaintiffs and others have been harmed by these violations.
47. As a result of these violations, the actions of the Board resulting in adoption of the final redistricting plan including senate pairings, should be voided.
48. The Board’s proclamation of redistricting should similarly be voided, as it was based solely upon the redistricting plan.
Second Claim - Violation of Article VI, Section 6
49 - 55
§ 6. District Boundaries
The Redistricting Board shall establish the size and area of house districts, subject to the limitations of this article. Each house district shall be formed of contiguous and compact territory containing as nearly as practicable a relatively integrated socio-economic area. Each shall contain a population as near as practicable to the quotient obtained by dividing the population of the state by forty. Each senate district shall be composed as near as practicable of two contiguous house districts. Consideration may be given to local government boundaries. Drainage and other geographic features shall be used in describing boundaries wherever possible.
Third Claim - Violation of Article VI, Section 10
56 - 59
(a) Within thirty days after the official reporting of the decennial census of the United States or thirty days after being duly appointed, whichever occurs last, the board shall adopt one or more proposed redistricting plans. The board shall hold public hearings on the proposed plan, or, if no single proposed plan is agreed on, on all plans proposed by the board. No later than ninety days after the board has been appointed and the official reporting of the decennial census of the United States, the board shall adopt a final redistricting plan and issue a proclamation of redistricting. The final plan shall set out boundaries of house and senate districts and shall be effective for the election of members of the legislature until after the official reporting of the next decennial census of the United States.
(b) Adoption of a final redistricting plan shall require the affirmative votes of three members of the Redistricting Board. [Amended 1998]
Fourth Claim - Violation of Article I, Section 1 (Equal Protection)
60-62
§ 1. Inherent Rights
This constitution is dedicated to the principles that all persons have a natural right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the enjoyment of the rewards of their own industry; that all persons are equal and entitled to equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law; and that all persons have corresponding obligations to the people and to the State.
Fifth Claim - Violation of Article I, Section 7 (Due Process)
64 - 68
§ 7. Due Process
No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. The right of all persons to fair and just treatment in the course of legislative and executive investigations shall not be infringed.
RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that this Court:
1. Enter a judgment declaring the Board’s redistricting plan promulgated pursuant to the proclamation dated November 10, 2021, to be in violation of the Open Meetings Act, Article VI, Sections 6 and 10 of the Alaska Constitution, and the equal protection clause and the due process clause of the Alaska Constitution;2. Enter a judgment declaring the Board’s redistricting plan promulgated pursuant to the proclamation dated November 10, 2021, to be null and void;
3. Enter an order enjoining the State Division of Elections and the State of Alaska from conducting any primary or general election for state legislative office under the Board’s redistricting plan, or otherwise taking any step to implement the plan;
4. Enter an order requiring the Board to promulgate a new redistricting plan consistent with the requirements of the Alaska Constitution or, in the alternative, enter an order correcting errors in the Board’s redistricting plan;
5. Enter an order declaring Plaintiffs to be public interest litigants as constitutional claimants and awarding costs and attorney’s fees;
6. Enter an order for such other and further relief as may be just and reasonable. DATED this 10th day of December, 2021.BRENA, BELL & WALKER, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs
By
Robin O. Brena, ABA No. 8511130 Jake W. Staser, ABA No 1111089 Laura S. Gould, ABA No. 0310042