I was taking pictures in the farmers' market at DuPont Circle in DC and I was looking at the street musician through my camera when he let me know he wasn't happy. I'm generally pretty easy going about photos. The people are far more important than the photo.
So we talked a while and so I suggested he get his advice to photographers on video so here it is.
Just out of curiousity, let's see how the YouTube video compares to the Viddler.
Pages
- About this Blog
- AIFF 2024
- AK Redistricting 2020-2023
- Respiratory Virus Cases October 2023 - ?
- Why Making Sense Of Israel-Gaza Is So Hard
- Alaska Daily COVID-19 Count 3 - May 2021 - October 2023
- Alaska Daily COVID-19 Count - 2 (Oct. 2020-April 2021)
- Alaska Daily COVID-19 Count 1 (6/1-9/20)
- AIFF 2020
- AIFF 2019
- Graham v Municipality of Anchorage
- Favorite Posts
- Henry v MOA
- Anchorage Assembly Election April 2017
- Alaska Redistricting Board 2010-2013
- UA President Bonus Posts
- University of Alaska President Search 2015
Sunday, April 18, 2010
2 comments:
Comments will be reviewed, not for content (except ads), but for style. Comments with personal insults, rambling tirades, and significant repetition will be deleted. Ads disguised as comments, unless closely related to the post and of value to readers (my call) will be deleted. Click here to learn to put links in your comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I can understand being annoyed by people taking pictures of you, but if you're putting on a performance in a public place, you're asking people to pay attention to you, making yourself a public figure. You can't then expect people to ask before taking a picture, particularly in a tourist-ridden place like DC, probably even performing in view of a security camera.
ReplyDeleteI agree with funkalunatic. The guy reminded us that he was there to make money. If the film of his act was used for financial gain by the photographer he might have a point. His attitude reminded me of those notices in historic buildings in Europe which prohibit photographs because it might inhibit the purchase of their postcards. But this performer was operating in a public space specifically for public viewing.It also follows that any consideration of invasion of private space must be superfluous.
ReplyDelete