We See What We Want To See

The Anchorage Daily News' lead editorial was on Ted Stevens today:

A sad day for Alaska

Alaskan of the Century draws scrutiny of federal authorities


It's a sad day for Alaska when a leader as influential and respected as Ted Stevens, 30-year veteran of the U.S. Senate, has his house searched by FBI and IRS agents.

Sen. Stevens has allowed a personal friendship to draw him into a potentially questionable arrangement with Bill Allen, long Alaska's most powerful and controversial political fundraiser.

When Sen. Stevens agreed to let his longtime friend Mr. Allen oversee remodeling of his Girdwood home, was Mr. Allen merely the project manager, or did he pay for part of the improvements?...

The editorial suggests that everything was fine until Stevens let Allen arrange things. People are complex. Rarely are they all good or all evil, usually some great mixture of good and not so good qualities. But when Stevens was named Alaskan of the Century in 2000 a good many of the warts were already visible. [Who chooses the Alaskan of the Century? As best as I can tell, a non-profit organization known as "Alaskan of the Year, Inc.*] But Alaskans tended to look the other way, smirk, or wink because Uncle Ted, as he's called here, consistently brought in the Federal dollars. I suspect no Alaskan who's been in this state for more than 20 minutes hasn't been impacted by Stevens. If they arrive at the Ted Stevens International Airport, if they get to ship things by mail at great rates to rural Alaska, if they drive the roads of most cities or towns, Uncle Ted has made their (I guess I should say 'our') lives easier than they otherwise would have been.

So as long as things were good, we didn't want to know too much. As long as Uncle Ted gave us our gifts when he visited, we smiled and said nice things about him. When the so called 'bridge to nowhere' campaign surfaced, some Alaskans were finally embarrassed enough to suggest that the money be sent back or to help Katrina victims . But the clues have been there for a while. We knew he had a nasty temper, or at least was a good actor, and used it to intimidate (is that the polite word for bully?) others. And if we didn't know things, the LA Times spelled a lot out in a Dec. 17, 2003 story on Stevens.

Senator's Way to Wealth Was Paved With Favors
by Chuck Neubauer and Richard T. Cooper


ANCHORAGE — He wielded extraordinary power in Washington for more than three decades, eventually holding sway over nearly $800 billion a year in federal spending.

But outside the halls of the U.S. Senate, which is a world of personal wealth so rarified some call it "the Millionaires' Club," Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) had struggled financially.

Then, in 1997, he got serious about making money. And in almost no time, he too was a millionaire — thanks to investments with businessmen who received government contracts or other benefits with his help.


Ted Stevens is chairman of the influential Senate Appropriations Committee.
Added together, Stevens' new partnerships and investments provide a step-by-step guide to building a personal fortune — if you happen to be one of the country's most influential senators.

They also illustrate how lax ethics rules allow members of Congress and their families to profit from personal business dealings with special interests.

Among the ways that Stevens became wealthy:

• Armed with the power his committee posts give him over the Pentagon, Stevens helped save a $450-million military housing contract for an Anchorage businessman. The same businessman made Stevens a partner in a series of real estate investments that turned the senator's $50,000 stake into at least $750,000 in six years.

As I was looking for this old article, I saw that others have found it too and published it now that Stevens is the center of so much attention nationally. To see the complete article, you can go to Commondreams.org. Getting it directly through the LA Times archive is much harder.


But my main point here isn't whether Stevens is good or evil. (I would never seriously ask such a question because as I said above, most people are far more complex than that.) Corruption at this level doesn't happen without the complicity of many people. We all knew, at the very least, that Alaskans were getting back far more money per capita than the people of any other state. And far more than we gave in taxes. We all knew that Uncle Ted had a great campaign war chest filled by lobbyists of all persuasions. Those of us who thought about it said things like, "Well, that's the way the game is played," or "If Ted doesn't get the money for Alaska, someone else will get it for their state," or "We are a small population in the biggest state, we have to use whatever means we can to get our fair share." Or some such argument.

At this juncture, when the power structure is being shaken up, can Alaskans of various political persuasions rally together and take a serious look at who we are and where we are going? Our Governor stood up to corruption. Her success is atypical of what happens to whistle blowers. But she did the right things at the right time and was rewarded for it. Can we as a state look at our financial situation - not as "what's in it for me," as the money flow from DC, or as our annual Permanent Fund Dividend checks - but as a way to fairly, competently, and efficiently allocate funds to those services and projects which are most needed and give us the most value for our dollar? Can we find ways to diminish the influence of professional lobbyists?

Now is the time to review whether the Permanent Fund remains a goody bag for individuals or we use its earnings as they were originally intended - to help pay for our collective state needs - infrastructure, education, police, maintenance of our land and resources, etc. The flow from DC is surely going to diminish. Our Permanent Fund is at $40 billion. Are we going to blow it? Or act collectively like responsible adults?

It is also time to reflect on what we knew, when, and what we chose not to know about Ted Stevens, Don Young, Bill Allen, and many others. What do we know about all our prominent politicians, business leaders, and educators and religious leaders as well? Do we individually have to the tools to distinguish between those who are sincerely and competently working in the public interest and those who use a facade of goodness to abuse our trust? And are we willing to not grab whatever we can from the collective pot?

This is one of those times of upheaval when we could make great changes. Or not.



*According to Taxemptworld.com , ALASKAN OF THE YEAR INC has been a charitible organization since July 1994 in Anchorage County [ok, this is a national organization that collects and posts non-profit registration forms from around the country and they don't know Alaska has boroughs instead of counties or that it is the Municipality of Anchorage, not the County] whose contact person is
RODNEY D LIND, and whose mailing address is
701 W 8TH AVE STE 600
ANCHORAGE, AK 99501-3468

A quick Google search discovers that 701 W. 8th Ave STE 600 is the office of the accounting firm KPMG Peat Marwick and that Rodney Lind asked the Board of Certified Public Accountants

for a waiver of the requirement that he earn 4
hours of continuing education in ethics for renewal of his CPA
license for the January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2007 renewal
period. He makes this request because he is licensed as a CPA in
two other states and receives continuing education in ethics in
those states.

The board denied the waiver

on the basis that Mr. Lind needs to be aware of changes in Alaska’s statutes and regulations.

OK, Rodney, I don't know you, and there is absolutely nothing here to suggest any wrong doing on your part. Asking to waive the ethics class requirements because you've already taken such courses in other states seems like a reasonable request. But since you are the contact person listed for the organization that selected Stevens as the Alaskan of the Century, there is a certain irony here that I just can't resist.