Pages

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

2011 Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend = $1,174

The Governor announced the value of this year's Permanent Fund Dividend a few minutes ago.
From Gov's Website video


I've posted on the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend in the past, so I won't repeat all that, but you can look here for some background.


The value of the fund as of yesterday was:


unaudited, as of Sep 19, 2011
US Bonds$5,950,200,000
US Stocks$5,620,700,000
Non US Stocks$7,003,400,000
Global Stocks$4,418,800,000
Non US Bonds$1,369,200,000
Real Estate$4,115,100,000
Cash$638,300,000
Alternatives$5,758,900,000
Real Return/External CIO$3,041,300,000
TOTAL$37,915,900,000

That's down over $2 billion since June when it was $40 billion.

Here's a history of the payments from the Permanaent Fund Corporation website.

1982 $1,000.00 1990 $952.63       2000 $1,963.86        2010 $1,281.00
1983 $386.15 1991 $931.34 2001 $1,850.28 2011 $1,174.00
1984 $331.29 1992 $915.84 2002 $1,540.76
1985 $404.00 1993 $949.46 2003 $1,107.56
1986 $556.26 1994 $983.90 2004 $919.84
1987 $708.19 1995 $990.30 2005 $845.76
1988 $826.93 1996 $1,130.68 2006 $1,106.96
1989 $873.16 1997 $1,296.54 2007 $1,654.00
1998 $1,540.88 2008 $2,069.00
1999 $1,769.84 2009 $1,305.00
[2008 = highest amount (Corrected, thanks Harpboy)2011 dividend added]


Norway's oil based Fund, which began in 1998, is about $530 billion.


BTW, when did the Alaska Permanent Fund become a Sean Parnell initiative?  On the Governor's webiste, we see this spin:

3 comments:

  1. He also tried to spin it as "dividend will drop as oil revenues drop" when annual oil revenues have no relation to the value of dividends, which are based on a the average return on investments over the past 5 years.

    But you err: 2008 was the highest year in your chart, not 2000!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Harpboy, Urgency is the enemy of accuracy. Thanks for alerting me to the error. I've fixed it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Alaska Permanent Fund returned 20.6 percent for fiscal year 2011 according to unaudited figures released on Tuesday. This is the third highest return in the Fund’s history. “We’re very pleased with the Fund’s performance this year – it’s been an outstanding year and we enjoy the chance to report such good news,”

    Despite 2006 dropping off of the 5 year average...we get a lower dividend than last year?

    Please make sense of this for me?

    ReplyDelete

Comments will be reviewed, not for content (except ads), but for style. Comments with personal insults, rambling tirades, and significant repetition will be deleted. Ads disguised as comments, unless closely related to the post and of value to readers (my call) will be deleted. Click here to learn to put links in your comment.