|Number of Candidates||Party|
|26 (each)||None; Unknown|
|13||No Party Affiliation|
|11 (each)||Libertarian; Write-In|
|4 (each)||Green Party; Constitutional|
|3 (each)||United Party; American Party|
|2 (each)||NBC; Independent American Party; Federalist Party|
|1 (each)||Reform Party; HEL; Democratic Farm Party; Communist; American Independent Party; AME; A99|
|421 total||Numbers as of June 25, 2015 at FEC Website. (Plus I admit to possible errors)|
I propose we aim for a one million candidate march on Washington DC. The date I've chosen is Friday the 13th (there's just one in 2016 - in May), because 999,999 of these candidates will be unlucky and not win. (Some actually may think those who don't win are the lucky ones.)
So that leaves less than a year to round up 999,579 more candidates.
So, how can you become a candidate so you can march next May 13? From the FEC website:
"Under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the Act), an individual becomes a candidate for federal office when:That's the easy part.
- The individual has received contributions aggregating in excess of $5,000 or made expenditures aggregating in excess of $5,000; or
- The individual has given consent to another person to receive contributions or make expenditures on behalf of him or herself and that person has received contributions aggregating in excess of $5,000 or made expenditures aggregating in excess of $5,000 (11 CFR 100.3(a))."
Slate explained the process and paperwork for running for President in 2008.
All the details - it's pretty complicated - are on another FEC webpage - Quick Answers To Candidate Questions.
There were a few party names that caught my eye.
HEL - Votesmart writes:
"William Knox Richardson
Announced, Helluva Party for PresidentA99 - Jeremy Lee Milligan.
5805 West Harmon Avenue #308
Las Vegas, NV 89103"
I haven't found anything that directly explains what the name of the A99 party (Party is not part of the name) is about. But I did find a reference to A99:15 of the Nixon Tapes where Nixon is talking to Governor Shafer about a commission that was looking at the legalization of marijuana:
You can read more aboutf Nixon and marijuana at CSDP.A99:15Shafer: The congressional members didn’t participate as much until the very end, and then Javits and Hughes tried to take over. [Chuckling] We would have had legalization if we hadn’t really, you know, they wanted to have the alcohol model, which is wrong. We were against legalization, because we feel that in the first place the returns are not in about the pharmacological effects of the drug.President Nixon: I would say this with regard to that, you know how Ray is an old politician. You know very well that no matter how precisely you state it, how your report reads, that they will try to oversimplify it and say, ‘The commission recommends legalization,’ or, ‘It does not recommend legalization.’ [Unclear] And I think it is important that you say, ‘Let us understand whatthis report does do and what it does not do. We do not believe marijuana should be legalized.’ I think youshould say that.’Shafer: We’ve already said it [unclear].President Nixon:And then you go on to say, ‘However, we believe that in terms of penalties that there should be some, uh, that in order to get at the problem there should be’ this and that and the other thing